this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
63 points (80.6% liked)

Technology

38915 readers
75 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 601error@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 years ago

Obligatory “What could possibly go wrong? /s”

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For that thing that killed hundreds of monkeys? Yeah, sounds like a great plan.

[–] birdcat@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 years ago

"only" 15-17 monkeys, but thousands of other animals, insanely depressing. the more you read about it, the more you will start to actually believe that the death of one particular primate could indeed be beneficial for humanity ...

On several occasions over the years, Musk has told employees to imagine they had a bomb strapped to their heads in an effort to get them to move faster, according to three sources who repeatedly heard the comment. On one occasion a few years ago, Musk told employees he would trigger a “market failure” at Neuralink unless they made more progress, a comment perceived by some employees as a threat to shut down operations, according to a former staffer who heard his comment. Five people who’ve worked on Neuralink’s animal experiments told Reuters they had raised concerns internally. They said they had advocated for a more traditional testing approach, in which researchers would test one element at a time in an animal study and draw relevant conclusions before moving on to more animal tests. Instead, these people said, Neuralink launches tests in quick succession before fixing issues in earlier tests or drawing complete conclusions. The result: More animals overall are tested and killed, in part because the approach leads to repeated tests. One former employee who asked management several years ago for more deliberate testing was told by a senior executive it wasn’t possible given Musk’s demands for speed, the employee said. Two people told Reuters they left the company over concerns about animal research.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ole Musky should step up and prove how safe it is. If he gets one, I'll definitely get one.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 19 points 2 years ago

One implant to rule them all, one implant to find them, One implant to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them

[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He behaves like he already has one.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

So then the thing that killed the monkeys was the smelling their smug farts all day? It all makes sense now...

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

He thinks we’re living in a simulation.

First rule of technology: if the increase in complexity and decrease in reliability outweigh the added tangible value, don't implement it. This is why it's usually best to avoid "smart" appliances or, you know, brain implants.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago

Lol this guy can't even make a car that doesn't kill someone or have a bumper that doesn't fall off

[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If someone besides Musk was running things, I might be excited about the potential for progress… as it stands, though, I just can’t trust the guy.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 years ago

Given what is coming out about how the animal test subjects were treated, you'd be better off letting a random dentist poke at your brain

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Same.

Although I can't say I would trust one from a FAANG company much more.

[–] Krapulaolut@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'll bet you need a lifetime subscription with that and get a blue verification mark on your forehead.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago

A 30 day lifetime subscription.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago

I can see how a quadrapoligic or someone with ALS would be excited for this trial. I hope it goes well. It could give someone that is trapped in their body a new way to communicate with their loved ones.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Does it support full auto-think?

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 years ago

Whoever thinks getting one is a good idea already has it enabled.

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

I already have that and I'm not impressed

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

I mean look on the bright side. It’s Musk’s sycophants who would line up to die for something like this.

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People would need to be force to insert this shit to be competitive in the market. This sucks

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is anyone up for starting a non religious Amish society?

[–] willybe@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Nice move there AI. I see what you're doing.

[–] waspentalive@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Always mount a scratch test subject before testing or reconfiguring.

http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/S/scratch-monkey.html

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

They're all dead already.