160
submitted 2 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 99 points 2 months ago

Ex-Xbox Exec

X Xbox Xec Series X|S

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago
[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Or muskrat having an aneurysm

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 69 points 2 months ago

People have been telling me that consoles are dying and everyone will play on PC instead for over 30 years. The convenience factor of the all-in-one hardware, and the supported lifetime of the platform, can't be understated. I can see docked phones being a replacement at some point. But I'd be surprised if PCs ever squash out consoles.

[-] simple@lemm.ee 36 points 2 months ago

Aside from convenience, the price really is a lot cheaper than equivalent PCs. An RTX 4070 alone costs as much as a playstation 5 (with disc), and that comes with a controller too.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

But you don't really need a 4070 for gaming. Just like you don't need a F150 to drive to work (most people don't at least). Plenty of lower end hardware does the job well. Over the course of the systems lifetime a PC can be very competitive in terms of prices for games. And it can be used for more than just gaming.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 8 points 2 months ago

That's not really a fair comparison though. The ps5 has nowhere near the gpu power of a 4070. The PS5 is equal to like a low-mid range PC. Also console players are paying yearly subscription fees to play multiplayer. Plus you can think of the display as a cost as well. You need a monitor or TV, just like a PC. PC is likely more expensive overall, but not by as much as people think. Plus PC gives you so many perks over consoles. So you're getting a ton more functionality for your money. It's really not a HUGE DEAL to get a console once you factor these things in. Deal, sure. But not a huge deal.

[-] MvPts@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Im a lifelong PC enthusiast, but I recently bought a PS5.

The amount of games you can play instantly with 14€ a month is overwhelming!

I could never build A equivalent Pc for the same price.

I came to realize that I prefer picking up the ps5 controller and get a game started in less than 30~ seconds instead of gaming on my PC.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 2 points 2 months ago

I don't understand this at all. You can get game pass or something on PC as well. That isn't a console only benefit.

[-] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I have about 100 games at this point I've gotten for free from Epic alone. Add in a few every year from steam and GOG, yeah not a great argument against PC...

[-] MvPts@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

My argument is that gaming on ps5 is cheaper and more convenient than on PC.

I referenced the game pass because games tend to be cheaper on PC in general.

The availability of a game pass equalizes the price for gaming and makes buying games on PS5 obsolete for me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Senshi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Game passes exist for PC as well, and offer even more variety there.

Boot time should never take 30sec on PC as well. But most consoles are actually not much faster in boot and loading times. People tend to compare a PC booting from cold with a console just booting from sleep/hibernation mode.

Boot times on PC however can easily be further optimized, especially when not using Windows for gaming. A gaming Linux distro will be faster by leagues, even in a cold start.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Game Pass owners fired the people who made Hi-Fi Rush, so I wouldn’t expect many bangers from them in the coming months.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I think in the near future, game-passes will cost one AAA game per month. Otherwise, I don't see how it will be sustainable business. Microsoft has already started increasing the price. I hope it doesn't happen though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

People dont deal with more freedom, I know I dont. I have a pc and ps5 and prefer the simplicity of the ps5 setup which is a big selling point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

PC is already larger than active users on both PlayStations combined, and it didn't used to be that way. Given the Steam Deck and what Microsoft have been saying about handhelds and their next console(s), you're looking at a very real possibility that the next Xbox is just a PC with a different UI, like the Steam Deck.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

isn't the steam deck much closer to a console than a PC?

[-] Paradox@lemdro.id 15 points 2 months ago

It's honestly the best of both worlds. A well built and tested hardware platform with well known specs and manufacturer support, that's capable of running any third party software at the drop of a hat

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 11 points 2 months ago

Not really? Conceptually maybe. But if you can install whatever OS you want and aren't forced to use official distribution methods then that seems pretty PC to me

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 2 months ago

Steam Deck is just Linux... It's the same as installing Linux with Steam. And run Proton via Steam.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Now we're in philosophical territory with questions like, "What is a console?" It runs PC games, but you can navigate it with a controller. It has most console features but is malleable enough to have most PC features.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but now you can buy an all-in-one convenient PC to plug on your TV with almost 100% retro compatibility, it's called the Steam Deck and it's awesome.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

I left my steam deck but it's no replacement for an actually high-end PC

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

But it is a replacement for a console like I told the person I replied to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 40 points 2 months ago

The improvements of steam and proton, steamlink and big picture mode make it possible to run great games on your TV. Its not „just turn on“ yet but we‘re getting there. I wanted a PS5 when they were unavailable but I since managed to play my favorite games on my tv with a ps4 controller and dont see the point to buy back into a locked up computer with a fancy case for games that have microstransactions gallore.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 2 months ago

Not to mention that if you're already playing PS4 games, a PS5 isn't opening up a lot more games for you and many PS4 ports to PS5 run worse than their PS4 counterparts.

[-] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 2 months ago

And 99 times out if 100 will get a PC release anyways...

[-] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

And 100 out of 100 times, we build emulators that run on PC. They can take years to make with the complexity of newer systems, but they'll get there.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its not „just turn on“ yet but we‘re getting there

I think we are 99% there. If you make a decent AMD based machine, install Bazzite on it, you can set it to "Open in Big Picture mode on startup". After the initial configuration in desktop mode (you need to do this only once during installation), you can just start the PC and sit in your couch. No need to download drivers or any desktop shenanigans. You control it using any standard game controller. No need for a mouse/kb; just start and play.

[-] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 2 months ago

Thats pretty awesome! :) thanks for sharing. Do you know by any chance if kodi has a steam app somewhere? I‘m going with a raspberry pi and it works well as a client for media but not yet for steam.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

As long as there are killer 1st party titles exclusive to a console platform, there’s a reason to buy one.

Personally, I love Zelda, Mario, and most recently I’ve been excited about the new Astro Bot game about to come out.

Outside of Steam Deck emulation, you need a console to play those, and I do enjoy the convenience.

The last Xbox worth buying was the 360, because all Xbox titles are released on other platforms now - eliminating the need for an Xbox console.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As long as there are killer 1st party titles exclusive to a console platform, there’s a reason to buy one.

Counterargument: some of us consider this kind of arbitrary BS a reason NOT to buy one.

And that's before you even consider the additional crap consoles pull, like Nintendo making the only way to back up your saves a fucking subscription service.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The new-gen console is actually trending 7 per cent ahead of the PS4 in the United States launch aligned.

And how much do you think the drop in Xbox is? It's way more than 7 percent. The problem for Sony isn't that its console is dying; it's that they're approaching market saturation. They've got their market cornered in a way that they never have, and they've only got a 7 percent lead off of the last generation. Peak dollars spent on consoles was back in 2009, when all three consoles were in very healthy competition. Many PS4 users are happy to stay on PS4, because the games they play are over 10 years old, like Grand Theft Auto V and Minecraft, so there's no need to upgrade.

Meanwhile, a console that launched with some idea of every game running at 60 FPS is now compromising on that (it was inevitable, but people believed otherwise). Games that used to be console exclusive are now coming out on PC, where you don't need to pay a subscription fee to play online and your library always comes with the assumption that every game you have will be forward compatible. Even if you buy the new PlayStation, there's no promise that your old games will run at better resolutions and frame rates. The controller you bought 10 years ago still works on PC, but Sony says you need to buy the new one, even if the game you're playing uses none of its new features. The VR system you bought before doesn't play the new VR games. For all sorts of economic realities, not the least of which are certification processes and licensing fees, there's a good chance that game you really want to play is on PC long before it's on console, in early access or otherwise. There are no competing storefronts for digital releases, so you can only pay what Sony says you have to pay. Consoles also aren't even significantly cheaper than an equivalent PC anymore, and they run basically the same hardware under the hood, so the reasons for a console as we know them today to exist are fewer and fewer as time goes on.

[-] RxBrad@infosec.pub 9 points 2 months ago

60fps PS5 games were only ever 60fps because they were really just PS4 games running on faster hardware.

Now that we're finally getting games that aren't cross-gen with the 10-year-old PS4, we're back to 30fps-ville.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Sont forget that pc games have faster, more frequent and longer updates, cross storefront multiplayer and quickly cost a lot less than at launch.

[-] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Oh, the Ex-Xbox Exec? I hear is now a Court Reporter with a unique sense of fashion, the jet-setting jort-sporting Court Reporter.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Failing manufacturers in this case mean manufacturers who've sold twice your product count?

Clearly Xbox have a weird definition of the word "fail".

[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Consoles will be around until the tech is sufficiently advanced as to negate their usefulness. There will come a day when a phone does everything a modern high end PC can. Bluetooth to a TV and play whatever you want.

Graphic fidelity is almost to a point where there isn't much more needed in the way of processing power. Another decade. Maybe 2. Consoles will still exist for decades yet. But they're going to become increasingly unnecessary.

Steam is futureproof. But nothing else.

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I disagree. Your phone can happily do that today as long as you're willing to play old games. This will always be the case, even when phones are able to play things today are now considered AAA, Desktop computers will be leaps ahead in what they can do.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think it's a bit shortsighted to assume gaming will have no use for significantly more powerful hardware in the future. even if not for graphics or VR, it could be greater use of AI, or something else we could never foresee.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Dedicated hardware still has benefits, having your phone notifications separate from gaming, if your phone breaks having your console break would suck, and imo a touchscreen will never surpass physical buttons on controllers so you'd still want those.

I personally hope the future looks more like a steam deck than a gaming phone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Can things that are true be a "pushed narrative"?

[-] redwattlebird 3 points 2 months ago

Is this when they realise that infinite growth isn't actually infinite? There's always a place for a device for entertainment. Be that pen and paper or electronic.

[-] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 3 points 2 months ago

Well, maybe there's some truth to that. my phone is basically a Switch when I slide it into a controller. The biggest problem it's facing is the limited library of non-shitty games and storage space. Once I can store a terabyte on my phone and can link it up to my steam library, I don't think I'd even consider buying a console again. To me, the only thing a playstation has over a steam deck is its exclusives.

[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

And exclusive titles is an asshole move to force users to buy a whole platform for a single game. It's anti competitive. It's anti consumer. It should be illegal.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
160 points (96.0% liked)

Games

32463 readers
1261 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS