95
submitted 2 months ago by deconstruct@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

For a variety of reasons, including operational security, a crew’s internet access is regularly restricted while underway, to preserve bandwidth for the mission and to keep their ship safe from nefarious online attacks.

But the senior enlisted leaders among the littoral combat ship Manchester’s gold crew knew no such privation last year, when they installed and secretly used their very own Wi-Fi network during a deployment, according to a scathing internal investigation obtained by Navy Times.

As the ship prepared for a West Pacific deployment in April 2023, the enlisted leader onboard conspired with the ship’s chiefs to install the secret, unauthorized network aboard the ship, for use exclusively by them.

So while rank-and-file sailors lived without the level of internet connectivity they enjoyed ashore, the chiefs installed a Starlink satellite internet dish on the top of the ship and used a Wi-Fi network they dubbed “STINKY” to check sports scores, text home and stream movies.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Holy shit. And they used Starlink. This Starlink.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/07/elon-musk-ordered-starlink-turned-off-ukraine-offensive-biography

They need the book thrown at them for risking putting their ship in the hands of a billionaire who thinks he knows what is best in a military operation.

[-] tetrachromacy@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

I'm amazed. Basic IT training should be enough to know that Starlink systems at the very least would be advertising their location to a third party non-US megacorp.

Easy solution: nationalize Starlink. That keeps it out of the hands of a lunatic man-child, and sailors can get their sports scores! Talk about a win win situation.

[-] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Third party, sure, but Starlink is absolutely a US corporation. They have joint projects with the US military, even

[-] figjam@midwest.social 10 points 2 months ago

All the more reason to bring it under control of the government

[-] Dumpdog@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I never knew the scope of the errors in judgement that the navy chiefs have made lately.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The chutzpah on these motherfuckers.

I may or may not know of a wired LAN that was setup in a ships berthing once for filesharing with some sleek cabling, but that network never touched the internet.

To rig up a ship wide wifi network and play it off like it didn't exist while deployed, over and over for months? I'm both impressed and honestly a bit pissed the main player only lost a rate or two. The rest getting NJP and likely no reduction in rate is bullshit as well. I've seen lower enlisted get just plain turbo fucked for incredibly minor things at NJP, and this is not that.

Its a small ship and all that so things are more lax, but come the fuck on.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

If the lack of creature comforts is really such a big deal, It wouldn't be that hard for them to provide canned entertainment and retrieve sports scores and basic news from shortwave or even receive only satellite traffic.

[-] Delta_V@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

"STINKY" is the default SSID for Starlink routers. These stupid motherfuckers couldn't even figure out how to change the default settings. I wonder if they were using a default username and password too?

OpSec my ass.

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
95 points (98.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
3399 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS