183
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by thayer@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Despite being a heavy cell phone user for more than 25 years, it only recently occurred to me that vertical navigation on most phones is inverted when compared to traditional computers. You swipe down to navigate upward, and up to navigate downward. I recently spent time using a MacBook, which apparently defaults to this "natural" scrolling (mobile-style), and I was completely thrown off by it.

I've been using natural scrolling on a couple of my own desktops ever since, mostly as a mental exercise, and I wondered...how many of you folks prefer this method?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] towerful@programming.dev 137 points 1 year ago

Trackpads and touchscreens get the phone way of scrolling.
These feel like you are interacting with a piece of paper, so you move the paper around.

Mousewheels get the traditional way of scrolling.
Mice are more like controlling something.
It just is. Like F1-F12 keys are always F1-F12 keys, not the alt-function (like media/brightness etc).

I hate that Apple has called it "natural" Vs "reverse" in some psychological reconfiguring that you are going against the grain if you don't agree with them (as opposed to them changing the established standard).

[-] digger@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

I use natural on the trackpad and traditional using a mouse.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Good points all around, though I do use my alt-functions more than the function itself.

[-] jsdz@lemmy.ml 114 points 1 year ago

It's a good thing Apple doesn't make cars. They'd put the gas pedal on the left just to be different, and claim it's more "natural" that way.

[-] helixdaunting@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

Don't give Tesla any ideas.

[-] Cpo@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they would probably let you pay a small fee per month for this feature.

[-] SoonaPaana@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago

I never remember which one is natural and which one is reverse. When I use a mouse or a trackpad, I am moving the scroll bar. When I am using a touch screen, I am moving the content.

[-] thayer@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

That makes sense and is probably the best no-nonsense rationale I've seen yet.

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

my idea is that when I scroll on the mouse, the bottom part of the scroll wheel touches the content

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago

"Natural" only seems natural if you were raised mostly on touchscreen devices, I've never seen a desktop have inverted scroll like that.

On a side note, Why do so many Linux programs not support auto scrolling by default if at all?

I didn't even know autoscroll was the name of middle clicking to scroll were your mouse went until I switched to Linux and noticed it missing in certain places.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

I think it is because of Unix/X11 tradition of the middle mouse button being for pasting the most recently selected text.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] syklone@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago

There is nothing natural about "natural scrolling".

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

It feels like gaslighting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mundane@feddit.nu 38 points 1 year ago

In the beginning, the mouse did not have a wheel. The only way to move the view was by dragging the scrollbar with the mouse pointer. So when we got mouse wheels, it was easy to just connect the wheel to the scrollbar. And thus the traditional direction makes sense since you are moving the scrollbar, not the view. With time, the scrollbars became more and more hidden, and we got a disconnect between what we were scrolling (the almost hidden scrollbar) and what we thought we were scrolling (the view). When you think of it as manipulating the view directly, the natural scroll makes sense. Because that is what we do in touch devices (manipulate the view directly).

That said, I use traditional scrolling because it's what I am used to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bceuhwps@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago

Natural is totally unnatural.

[-] abuttandahalf@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago

Traditional with mice, natural with touchpads.

Interesting story, I used traditional scrolling with touchpads all my life until I spent three years exclusively using a desktop. Came out of it suddenly rewired to scroll like I do on my phone.

[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 31 points 1 year ago

Traditional for mouse, natural for touchpads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Real gangstas also switch their PGUP and PGDN keys to natural scrolling.

[-] funkajunk@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Easy there Satan

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago

I use traditional scrolling for everything except touch screens.

Traditional - unless it is fingers on the screen!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Traditional for both scroll wheels and trackpads (trackpads are emulating a mouse, you heathers!) And inverted Y for gaming.

[-] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think trackpads emulating a mouse should be considered a poor implementation, a trackpad is different than a mouse and we should utilize that with the design. A trackpad is best imo when combined with gestures, almost as a hybrid between a typical touchscreen and mouse. For example pinching motions, two/three finger tapping, two handed use, etc are all options for a trackpad that don't work (or work poorly) on a mouse.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

You meant traditional or the wrong way. There's nothing natural about it.

[-] Still@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago

I hate how natural is called natural cuz there's nothing natural about it, when using a touchpad or mouse you're controlling the viewport, mouse down should move the viewport down

[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Seems to be a common thing in the UX design world to give your ideas very humanist or comfy sounding names. I get the intention to make change sound less threatening but it gives off very cult-like vibes to me.

But I ain't a designer by any means, I looked into abit of UX design/philosophy and was turned off by all the buzzwords and seeming lack of discussion around what users actually want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 year ago

If it's a touch screen then the "natural way" is more intuitive, as it feels like grabbing the actual subject matter and moving it in a direction while my view point stays the same. Once my hand is not touching the subject matter, the traditional way is the only one that makes sense to me. I also get annoyed when something has scroll wheel zoom and up is zooming out, I have to reverse that back or I just don't use it.

[-] Snowplow8861@lemmus.org 15 points 1 year ago

Start realising that the way you're used to scrolling with your mouse wheel, is a cog between you and the service it's moving. Actually you were using natural all along. It was the early touch pads that were wrong and nonsense.

[-] gravitasium@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

This! I use traditional with wheels and natural with touchpads

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

Traditional for scroll wheels, natural for track pads.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago

Traditional. I'm too old to learn new things

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago

I hate "natural" scrolling but I understand that it's only because I've been conditioned for decades with the traditional desktop scrolling method. It's not "better", it's just not worth the effort to retrain myself for something that is merely equivalent.

UI design should not be dictated by what people learned on decades-old systems. It should be designed just as much for new users. So even though I personally hate it, I think it's a reasonable default.

I remember when I first started using GUIs, the scrolling direction seemed counterintuitive. As I introduced beginners to computing in the 90s, I saw many with the same confusion at first. "Why does it move up when I press down?" Everyone got used to it pretty quickly, but that doesn't make it "right".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Traditional for everything, mouse or touchpad, natural scrolling fcks with my brain

[-] SGHFan@lemdro.id 11 points 1 year ago

Natural on mice, traditional on trackpads.

[-] pascal@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

You monster!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Madiator2011@lm.madiator.cloud 11 points 1 year ago

Traditional for mouse and natural in case of touchpads. That what I use with my Mac :)

[-] archy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Traditional. I imagine the mouse wheel on top of the screen, as if the wheel scrolls the screen content

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Traditional all the way. "Natural" is not right.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Traditional for mouse (and trackpoint).

Natural for touchpad.

[-] kingludd@lemmy.basedcount.com 7 points 1 year ago

We still scroll "down" to the "bottom" of the page, so how is moving your finger up more natural? Maybe i'm just old now.

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

The scroll wheel is attached to the roller of the scroll, that's how I feel about it.

[-] Vorthas@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Traditional for everything. Scrolling down means the view goes down. The mouse controls the camera (the reason why I always invert Y axis on controllers).

[-] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

"Natural" is so ingrained in me by now that Samsung Dex' lack of the option is fucking with me.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
183 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

48325 readers
672 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS