They are intentionally making it difficult to see live. This way they can show you clips the next morning of only what they want you to see.
This is the real answer.
The others may be true, but the debate runners and the GOP party leaders know some crazy shit is going to be said at one point or another, and they want to be able to selectively present it.
Its really tough for me to say this. I was born and raised conservative, i.e. republican. It wasnt until Trump became a serious candidate in 2016 that i started to question their motives. I still consider myself conservative, but i cant bring myself to agree with anything the gop has done in the last decade.
I knew it was Rumble before I even opened it.
What's fun is Sam Seder suggested mirroring The Majority Report on Rumble to find out how much money they would make from angry conservatives hate-watching.
He absolutely should. After all they're "anti-cancel culture". So I'm sure they would love to have him on. And would not interfere in any way with rebroadcasting or monetization. Who're we kidding. Of course they would find some way to manipulate and push against speech they don't like. The people who cry about " cancel culture " the most. Are the ones that practice it the most. They just get incensed when they're on the other end.
And I think we can all rest pretty sure that most monetization doesn't come from advertising or views. But contracts pushed by wealthy investors with a particular interest in only pushing a few specific views. It's a disinformation service and nothing more.
Well every single GOP debate is itself a haven for disinformation and extremism, so I don't see how you could possibly be genuinely surprised that they'd partner with someone as despicable as themselves.
If anything, the real headline is "ABC still pretending that the GOP is a legitimate political party rather than a fascist movement that must be stopped by any means necessary"
A bit too long for a headline, I admit, but completely accurate.
A case of "knowing your audience". Better host your amoral and unethical content on platforms where it doesnt get ripped apart by the more educated majority.
Shocker
I love that the font for “democracy” looks so much like the game Monopoly’s title font.
Bunch of people all waiting to fuck the country over to control all the money.
Sounds to me like they've found the perfect partner.
Not really shocking to be honest.
And in a related story- duh.
You never see hexbear users in these threads talking about how conservatives are the enemies of progress and to nuke the west. Just sayin'
AFAIK hexbear isn’t federated with lemmy.world, so no wonder they aren’t here
And nothing of value was lost
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News