61
submitted 1 month ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 46 points 1 month ago

Talking about speeds using liquid nitrogen is a totally worthless discussion.

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago

Well that's just like, your opinion, man.

For the people down voting me, the person I'm responding to's handle is literally "my opinion" and I'm making a joke off of that

[-] oo1 5 points 1 month ago

downvotes are up in bizzaroland

[-] NichtElias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Ooo, that 1 was good

[-] Malix@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

exactly this.

As cool as it is (pun intended) to reach new heights with liquid nitrogen, what is the usecase for ~an hour (give or take) of stupid fast computing? I generally tend to use my machines longer than that.

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 month ago

Records. Overclockers have been battling for years to see how fast they can get chips. Its very cool.

[-] LostXOR@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

Water cooling is lame, liquid nitrogen cooling is the way to go!

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
61 points (95.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8507 readers
513 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS