351
Snap bad (midwest.social)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Thyrian@ttrpg.network 115 points 2 months ago

I think most snap haters mostly hate, that Canonical forces snap upon them, an wouldn't hate so much about it if they had the choice.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 83 points 2 months ago

Yeah, who'd hate using a package manager that increasingly slows down your boot time with every package installed, or that uses a closed source store to provide you FOSS

Maybe there's a reason canonical has to force it on their users

[-] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago

I also hate that it creates a loopback device for every installed snap

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 2 months ago

There's a lot I dislike about snap. This is the thing I hate.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Yeah typing "apt install firefox" and getting the Snap version does loudly and obnoxiously disqualify Ubuntu from any devices owned by me or my family.

[-] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Thanks to snap I switched to arch. It gave a linux beginner so much drive to learn the terminal and install a harder os lol. The firefox snap was the worst shit.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I never used snap, always use official repo > multilib > extra > chaotic aur > aur > flatpak > FUCK IT, I BUILD FROM SOURCE CODE FROM SHADY GITHUB REPO

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 29 points 2 months ago

FUCK IT, I BUILD FROM SOURCE CODE FROM SHADY GITHUB REPO_*

I feel seen.

[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 20 points 2 months ago

curl shit | sudo bash is just so convenient.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

I hope you mean https://shit.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

http://mysite.net | sudo bash

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] alper_celik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The safest install method \s

[-] vfye@toast.ooo 25 points 1 month ago

Thread made by canonical employee

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unrushed233 13 points 1 month ago

Now also throw GNU Guix, Homebrew and some AppImages in there

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People using Linux should take their heads out of their asses sometimes and just let people enjoy things they way they prefer.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 months ago

Fuckin preach it friend!

That's the joy of Linux, the "have it your way" approach to an OS

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 23 points 2 months ago

yeah well, you can't have it your way on Ubuntu when Canonical FORCES you to use snaps (heck they even hacked apt to prefer snaps instead of debs)

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

It's a shame that snaps are forced to use Canonicals closed source backend because they are really good, and a fully snap system is a very compelling idea for immutable systems

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Snap is bad. I only say this as someone who did a lot of OS security work for Linux and Unix, so take that with a grain of salt.

[-] Max820@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

Would you mind explaining why? I'm genuinely curious

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

snap bad indeed

[-] Atlas48@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 month ago

I use nix like the AUR for debian.

[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

I have NODE installed using snap lmao. Why? Installing it the normal way just gives me tons of errors that I'm too bored to deal with. I'm sure there's a fix, but I'm too lazy to debug all that. Of course, I don't use snap node for hosting servers and stuff. I just use it for react native. Regardless, it works n I'm happy lol

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah. I don't mind snap at all for cases where a better package doesn't exist.

What made me give up Ubuntu was how it railroaded me into snap versions of packages that work better, for me, as native .deb installs.

[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Oh definitely. Canonical forcing us to use snap Firefox was very shitty. I mean I still use Ubuntu because I'm lazy, but I did change the snap Firefox thing to the apt libraries or whatever.

I really don't understand why they don't just adopt flatpak.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
351 points (90.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21280 readers
837 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS