There should be regulation around use of the word "news". Many of these stations call themselves "News Radio" as if they only reported verifiable facts, but well over 50% is opinion.
Anything presented as news should be kept separate from opinion. If it's news, you should be able to defend it like it was said under oath.
Personally, I would love it if news channels had to distinguish opinion content from news by removing the word news from the screen and replacing it with the word opinion. That or some other clear and unmistakable signal to the audience should be there to establish whether the station is going on record and asserting facts or whether this is some talking head spewing bullshit.
It's crazy that news papers have been doing this forever. You have your news section and opinion and editorial section. TV and radio should definitely follow the format and be clear about what they are presenting.
Speaking of regulation, their hateful opinions getting such a far reach is a direct result of the telocommunications act of '96
Whilst the act for which you speak definitely accelerated the bullshit, it wasn't peaches and cream back in the day. Just look at the film Citizen Kane a fictitious (and lawsuit resistant) depiction of William Randolph Hearst. In it an exceptionally wealthy business man uses the media to promote his political aims. And to skew narratives outside of strict politics. A man who craves love and adoration but can't reciprocate. Remind you of anyone? I would say Musk's purchase of Twitter fills at least one of those molds, Trump the rest.
True and by way of conversation, Chinatown (1973) might as well have been made yesterday.
The milk and meat industry lost their shit when soy milk companies started calling their product "milk." The same outrage should be spent on these "news" organizations.
They tried with air America and it was ok but not really all that compelling. Truth and facts just don't sell like toxic divisive fantasies.
Isn’t that how we got the national treasure that is Rachel Maddow?
Ronald Reagan started the fight to get rid of the Fairness Doctrine.
Back in the Cronkite Era, if a station ran an editorial it had to provide equal time for opposing views.
Rush Limbaugh and his gross career owes its entire existence to that. He is someone who believes that drug dealers and smugglers need to be shot without trial... and he himself was a drug dealer when he was hard for cash.
Tells you a good deal of what kind of person we're dealing with here.
He is someone who believes...
I just want to point out that this dude is dead in case you hadn't heard that piece of good news.
Oh I know he's dead. Best part is he is so old school that he dies at the age of 70. Which was the life expectancy of that time period.
that probably ranks near the bottom of the worst things he's said and done list.
And Clinton put the final nail in the coffin with the telecom Reform Act.
Reagan/Bush era lasted 1988 to 1992.
But yeah, let's blame Clinton and ignore the GOP controlled Congress.
Hold my beer!
-The Telecommunications Act of 1996
US fascism had been here for decades. Too many people don't recognize fascism because they think fascism will arrive selling oppression and tyranny. If you're part of the privileged group fascism is selling you safety, normalcy, and tradition. (status quo)
The key point is they are selling BULLSHIT. Even if you are of the right color / party, you are one misstep away from being burned at the stake.
That's what most of these MAGA morons don't realize, they aren't going to be the rulers, they'll be cannon fodder for the 1%, and even part of the 1% IE Muskrat will have to watch their backs.
Fascism benefits no-one in reality... Even the leaders of the movement are constantly watching their backs because their allies are scumbags like themselves.
Going down that dark rabbit hole, I can see how some people might see some benefits.
Entire classes of jobs get reserved for you. All white collar jobs and the better blue collar jobs go to those with the right skin color and genitals.
You get a government provided sex maid to serve you at home. She is less likely to leave you because she less legal and economic options to do so. If she acts up against you, you are allowed to "correct" her.
There is a hierarchy of deference that you are high up on. You may not rank in the 1%, but your word means more than someone of a different gender or ethnicity.
People may be willing to risk their freedom for that elevated position.
Those are all fantasies. Every incarnation of a fascist government has always lead to war, famine and suffering from the regular people.
The fantasy you describe STILL requires cooperation, honestly and trust, which are impossible in a fascist dictatorship.
At best the 1% get a few years of living the high life like Saddam, but sooner or later it all falls in on itself.
The big shift from Truman to Trump has been the number of domestic residents benefiting from our fascist policies. That number is shrinking year after year.
Half a century ago, you could talk to a rising tide carrying all our ships. Did that tide come from blood spilled in Africa, the Middle East, and the Pacific Rim? Sure. But that wasn't our problem.
Now we're seeing the kind of brutal police tactics reserved for Vietnam and Iraq show up in Florida and on the Columbia University campus. We've got paramilitary goons targeting Haitians in Ohio, rather than in Haiti. We're increasingly reliant on prison labor to do the work of historical migrant labor. Our agitation against China isn't generating jobs in the MIC nearly as fast as it's killing jobs in the civilian sector.
If you’re part of the privileged group fascism is selling you safety, normalcy, and tradition.
A big goal of the AI Revolution is to shrink the number of people the Executive tier have to pay in order to keep their positions. And even executive positions are consolidating as businesses merge and buy one another out.
It's terrifying everyone, and Trump is just the guy who figured out how to sell traditional Republican voters a way out. Traditional Republican leaders only know how to preach austerity and justify poverty.
Even in Canada. Most talk radio stations are right wing hate BS.
That’s why we need to defend cbc
And also strict regulation regarding broadcasted information. There ought to be fines for misinformation. Spreading lies and hate shouldn't count as "free speech".
Go to the top podcast lists and you’ll see that one is also dominated by right-wing personalities too.
Those that talk the most are usually the ones you should listen to the least.
"Has arrived," as though it hasn't been churning just beneath the surface since the beginning, and succeeding in lifting its filthy maw above the water line many, many times.
No one who wants to hear what the left-of-right has to say listens to talk radio, but everyone who needs to hear it listens to talk radio.
You can literally see the generational technical divide which is not clean.
I'd bet most households /car owners could have their age and political alignments rated solely on a few metrics.
Do you watch cable? Do you stream shows? Do you pirate.
Do you own a car? Use the radio or Bluetooth? Have a Spotify or YouTube account?
You'd easily see people's politics fit in with where they get their content.
Car use wouldn't be a good metric in the US (maybe more so in other countries). It's too necessary in most places. But otherwise I agree.
Talk radio is a bastion of old white men. Trying to sway it is a lost cause. The only hope is out lasting their deaths.
If Harris wins I think we have good shot of things moving back towards sanity, especially if she lasts two terms.
Talk radio is essentially a person telling you what to think and feel. It can't even be classified as learning because it's being done to you when you listen. It's a confirmation bias circle jerk. Democrats tend to be educated and educated people usually are repelled by the format.
I think NPR does a good job providing talk radio type material that isn't repellant to people with critical thinking skills.
Do you consider their offerings substantially different than talk radio?
NPR usually has a diversity of views and the dialogue isn’t as 24/7 emotional.
I think the big thing with conservative talk radio is that it’s the verbal equivalent of Micheal Bay - 24/7 PAY ATTENTION RIGHT NOW. Think Alex Jones’s incoherent screaming rants as he plays air raid sirens. He does have guests/callers, but any views that he doesn’t agree with will get shouted down. (He has the illusion of disagreement with more explicitly racist guests - he won’t boot you off if you start talking about the Jews, but will pretend he’s a little uncomfortable). But it’s lots of yelling, and THEY ARE TRYING TO CUT YOUR SONS PENIS OFF! Pretty sure that format goes back through Rush to Hicks.
NPR doesn’t really tell you what to think. It comes across as left leaning because the Overton window in the US has been pushed so far to the right that our Democrats have the positions that Republicans did 20 years ago, while our Republican Party is fantasizing about purges. But NPR has calm, reasoned discussions between folks of all political persuasions. You can even hear it in the voices - it’s a common punchline how calm the reporters are.
It’s not the talk format - it’s the content and presentation.
I don’t think there’s been one since Air America. Al Franken hung out there. Rachel Maddow.
Honestly radio is dying much like television.
Podcasting is the better space to get going.
Also tictoc.
We need to get the young folks of the incel pipeline .
Podcasting is the better space to get going.
Joe Rogan and other right-wing cranks.
Also tictoc.
A significant part of the rise of fascism in Europe among young people.
Anyway I do like podcasts, and it's full of good content (and so is tiktok presumably) but neither are lacking right-wing content.
It's better in my opinion to meet people where they're at. Radio isn't where they're at. That was my point.
The Majority Report on YouTube is fantastic.
The Daily Beans.
Beau of the Fifth Column.
I've Had it Podcast.
Vaush.
Pod Save America.
Bad Hasbara.
There are many more, but it's a matter of putting ears and eyes on where they need to be.
Getting young folks off the incel pipeline is going to be really tough in today's environment.
Incel is the new fat. Most of society immediately treats them like scum that did it to themselves. In a lot of cases both fat people and incels are at fault, but trashing them isn't going to fix the issues.
Your need to understand them and how they got there to try and change them or at least reduce new ones from being created. Not just hate them.
Can we start labeling opinion articles? It can be misleading
The time to stop this fascist talk before it became a problem was 69 years ago
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News