162
Several members of 'The Freedom Caucus' have openly admitted they won't end the shutdown unless all the federal cases against Trump are ended.
Then it's gonna suck to be in the Military or Border Patrol, and have to report for duty without pay. Especially when Congress will get paid.
There were about 1.4 million active military personnel in 2022.
CBP (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) has more than 60,000 employees.
WIC served about 6.3 million participants each month in fiscal year 2022, including an estimated 39 percent of all infants in the United States. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/wic-program/
Elected officials should be the last to get paid with no back pay if they allow this shit to happen willingly like this.
If only they weren't rich already and can weather it out easily.
That's the thing they get paid. They however shouldn't be allowed to leave the building until the shutdown is over and they reach a deal.
No where else can you completely fail and your job and keep it.
Nah they should be the ones responsible for paying the back pay. Fuck em.
You get used to it. Republicans shut down the government every 2-4 years.
What would happen if all border guards just said "Well, I'm not getting paid, I'm not going to work." and just left the gates open? 🤔 I think that would solve the shutdown real quick!
As a practical matter, it would mean international flights to the US are halted. If you will recall the last time there was a shutdown and it appeared that TSA agents were going to walk off the job due to not being paid, they reached an agreement to end the shutdown pretty quickly.
Shhhh! If you tell conservatives that a government shutdown results in starving babies, they will never open it back up!
The Sedition Caucus just loves the failed one-termer that is donnie so very much. So much for independent federal investigations into donnie I guess.
I mean, they're all shit, but I found this part interesting:
McCarthy’s outside counsel earlier this week sent a cease and desist letter to the person soliciting influencers to bash Gaetz and claiming to be doing so on behalf of McCarthy, according to a copy of the letter obtained by CNN
Which to me, reads like Gaetz is setting up a social media false flag on McCarthy's side, which is an insane level to stoop to for pointless in-party infighting.
They literally are incapable of discussing the actual problem at hand and just bicker?
Cripes
The GOP has so utterly dedicated itself to obstructionism over fixing problems and actual conservative ideals they can't help but obstruct their own party attempts at proving they are competent and capable of governing.
Let them fight. Though someone should really get to the bottom of Groomer Gaetz' extracurricular activities...
We tried, not enough evidence. His dirtbag buddy was expected to flip once he caught a guilty verdict. He did not. The girl in question won't testify and, because she now has on OnlyFans page, the prosecution didn't want her to anyway. You can imagine how the defense would tear into her.
So, that's that. We got nothing and it's over. To top it all off, his seat is perfectly safe down here. Even at the height of his troubles, there were Gaetz signs all over my hood.
I don't know how it would pass constitutional muster, but I think in the event of a shutdown all federal representatives (and families) should have all positive financial transactions except for their congressional pay be put in a low yield bank account and only released to the representative once the transaction has be audited by a non-essential federal auditor; a.k.a, you have to live on ONLY your salary until the shutdown is over.
Why should they get their salary? This is happening because they didn't do their damn jobs.
Because most are filthy rich well in excess of the salary, and so this scheme would be an actual punishment, while not depriving those few who actually need their congressional salary to live.
I wish I was a member of Congress just so I could laugh in Thumbnails face. People like Geatz and Jorden and that whole corner table of lunchroom rejects need to be laughed at on the floor and in the hallways. The only way those assholes will go away is by being rejected to thier face.
Yeah bruh if they could enter into a duel to the death, that’d make for some kickass ass c-span.
We should bring this back.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“I asked him whether or not he was paying those influencers to post negative things about me online,” Gaetz told CNN’s Manu Raju – and confirmed that McCarthy said he wouldn’t waste time on him.
With only three days to go before government funding expires, House Republican divisions have been on full display with the conference at odds over the path forward as Congress barrels toward a shutdown.
House Republicans are planning late night votes Thursday on a series of separate spending bills, though it’s not clear if the measures have enough GOP support to pass and at least one is expected to fail.
On the other hand, if any of the spending bills fail, GOP leadership may point to that to make the case to the holdouts that a short-term funding extension is the only viable path forward.
McCarthy has been saying all week this was the plan but as the hardliners have dug in, it remained an open question if he’d go through with it, risk a potentially embarrassing vote and be seen as unable to pass a bill out of his chamber before a Saturday midnight deadline.
A shutdown could have enormous impacts across the country, in consequential areas ranging from air travel to clean drinking water, as many government operations would come to a halt, while services deemed “essential” would continue.
The original article contains 1,331 words, the summary contains 225 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
162 points (96.0% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3787 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS