Automatic Voter Registration: A Closer Look At The Ongoing Debate (ace-usa.org)

submitted 1 month ago by unitymatters@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Automatic Voter Registration (AVR) is gaining traction, but is it the key to higher voter turnout or a potential security risk? This article breaks down how AVR works, the arguments for and against it, and its impact on elections. If you're curious about how this policy could shape the future of voting, check out this article.

https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/automatic-voter-registration-a-closer-look-at-the-ongoing-debate/

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

It is 2024, you are the richest country in the world, the fact that this is an actual issue is embarrassing.

This all stems from you guys not having a proper national ID number system.

Get that sorted, it would make your life sooooo much easier.

[-] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_number

[-] SanctimoniousApe 7 points 1 month ago

They said "proper".

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

The SSN is not a national ID number, it is being used as one, but that was never the purpose behind it.

Just the fact that it is a serial number without any checksum is enough to tell you that it is not a proper ID number system.

This quote from the below article shows how ridiculous the situation is:

currently citizens are identified by a patchwork of documents issued by both the Federal government of the United States as well as individual State governments of the United States and Local government in the United States governments.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_documents_in_the_United_States

You never want to hear/read the word "patchwork" when describing a national ID system....

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024

37 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19088 readers

3666 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News