236
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Not only hypocrisy, but also not true at all lol.

Biden pretty much okay'd Universities arresting their students to stop protests because his lobbyists threatened to withhold funding for both the party and each respective university.

Of course he didn't care about the zionist mob that attacked UCLA students, so it's pretty clear where he stands.

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago

This is Peak Liberalism. Saying this while genociding them.

"we SEE you, we HEAR you, but Israel needs money . . ."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] machinin@lemmy.world 124 points 2 days ago

Stop enabling the genocide? Please?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago

All they have to do is pledge to follow the Leahy Law....

Israel won't comply, which means we legally can't provide arms. Kamala doesn't even have to be "the bad guy", she can just say she's choosing to follow American law and if Israel wants arms then they can comply like every other recipient has to.

It's really as easy as saying:

If elected I will not break American law to send arms to foreign countries.

Boom, election locked up.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

You people really have a massively inflated concept of how many voting progressives that there are. Get off the internet for a while...

Harris would 100% lose the election if she said that.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How many voters would she lose if she declared intent to stop assisting Isreal?

She might possibly gain a few, but would she lose any?

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

Yes. Enough to lose. These people don't seem to understand this (or refuse to)

[-] nednobbins@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

It's a valid question and I'm sure the Harris campaign has spent considerable resources trying to get a good estimate of that number.

It's pretty insane that the Democratic party officials have to say, "We'd love to stop funding a genocide but our members won't vote for us if we do that."

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Is not about voters, it's about money. Both parties are bribed to keep it going.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 25 points 2 days ago

Best they can do is thoughts and prayers. Oh wait, that was school shootings. Never mind then.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

School bombings don't qualify.

[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

Israelis don't have the guts to even look the children in their eyes as they slaughter them. Cowards.

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

When they actually face real soldiers like in Southern Lebanon they get their arses handed to them.

All they know is blow up pager, burn refugee camp, bomb hospitals, shoot pregnant women in belly, rape men to death, and sniper bullets in kid’s heads.

[-] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I'm also offended by Israeli war crimes but I don't think that's an accurate assessment.

As far as I can tell, the Israeli military is very good at violence. They're extremely well equipped, they have superb training, and their military personnel tend to be dedicated to their cause.

The main problem isn't their ability to kill and destroy, it's their indiscriminate use of that ability.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

machinin was thrown out of a window

Anybody? Any solution will do, cmon people

[-] Lennny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Not those islams!

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 day ago

If you aren't anti-arab a nice gesture might be to stop murdering them.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

But there is a lot of water in Lebanon. Israel wants that.

[-] diffusive@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No more Islamophobia if there aren’t Islamic people any more 🤷‍♂️ /s

[-] Letsdothis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Anti-arab hate... let's see... Arab hate is bad, so anti-arab hate is good... but they are trying to "counter" anti-arab hate, so that's bad?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Yeah, good luck with that. Islamophobia is one of Trump's tentpoles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Peak liberalism

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

Setting aside the hypocrisy, is it just me or is it infuriating how the whole article is a whole lot of nothing?

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 5 points 1 day ago

Did you even read it? It states literally 20 bullets on how the Executive Branch will combat racism.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I didn't see any bullet points about no longer genociding arabs.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

According to the White House site linked here that you didn't read, we only care about the ones that pay U.S. taxes or live in the US, including Muslim immigrants in the US. The others outside of the USA can go fuck themselves.

[-] nednobbins@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I just read that list. As near as I can tell they put a lot of words in that don't actually promise anything helpful. Maybe I'm wrong.

Let's make it as easy as possible to show this plan in a good light. Instead of finding one bad bullet point in that list and tearing it up, let's see if we can find one good one.

Out of that entire list, which bullet point do you think has the best chance to actually "counter Islamophobia and Anti-Arab Hate?"

edit: grammar

load more comments (1 replies)

This is pure Liberal brainrot, sometimes reality feels like a parody of itself. I dont even have much to say tbh, im too tired for this bs.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
236 points (94.4% liked)

News

23161 readers
2948 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS