228
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 month ago

How bad is your registration system if you allowed 6500 noncitizens onto your voter roles? I’m not sure you should be boasting

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 month ago

Right? What fucking kind of win is this?

Hey everyone look I claimed to fix a problem that either didn't exist or was vastly overstated and to the extent it did exist it was due to my own incompetence!!

See no one cares.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, the base he's speaking to, is rabidly cheering him on and congratulating him.

People tend to forget, these announcements are meant for us. They are meant for their cultists and they work.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 1 month ago

even funnier from the article:

"His office then edited the press release after publication, softening it by adding the word “potential” before noncitizens."

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Which means he knows he removed citizens. Which is illegal. I'm assuming he's lawyering up now.

[-] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

His lawyer is AG Paxton, who is somehow a worse person than Abbott

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

I mean, you COULD make that assumption. It also just sounds like “we just removed people. citizens? Illegals? Who knows?” Incompetence

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

In many areas, non-citizens are allowed to vote in local elections. They may not be eligible to vote in federal elections, but some states allow all residents. not just citizens, to vote in local and/or state elections. So non-citizens being on the voter rolls is normal and expected, they just have to be tracked separately from the citizens that can vote in every election.

I don't know about Texas specifically), but removing non-citizens from voter rolls in those areas simply because they're non-citizens could actually be illegal. Although, that would of course be a state law, and thus us to the State's AG to prosecute, not likely in these hypocritical states.

There's also the entirely likely possibility that these "noncitizens" are actually citizens entered into the voter rolls incorrectly by the State at some point in the past, meaning whatever proof they used at the time, wasn't recorded. There is something going through the courts in AZ currently related to a group of registered voters from like 20+ years ago that either pre-dated that information being recorded, or the information is now missing for whatever reason. And of course the Republicans want them removed as close to the election as possible so there isn't enough time to verify citizenship before the election, instead of going through that at any point in the last 2 years when there was plenty of time to properly verify and correct the missing info.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

How many citizens were removed?

[-] Trilobite@lemm.ee 30 points 1 month ago
[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Probably much more than that:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced on Monday that the state has removed roughly a million people from its voter rolls since he signed a legislative overhaul of election laws in 2021.

Source: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/08/27/greg-abbott-voter-rolls-texas/

[-] TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't have responded to some random letter asking if I'm a citizen either

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wouldn't respond directly to the letter, either, but you bet I would march off to whoever administers elections where I am and make sure nobody un-registered me. I shouldn't have to, but I would anyway.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 18 points 1 month ago

Im boosting and upvoting this which is somewhat of a rarity for me. I thought about pasting the article text but its long and the site (well with no script) is clean. This article is just wow. million people removed for what he claims is thousands are non citizens of which hundreds had voted and the press followed up on many removed and they were citizens. Appears non citizens are people removed who were sent letters about it and did not respond. That was the criteria. I.E. (at least in my mind) many of these poeple moved and did not up date their registration and likely did not get the letter.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Sounds like a reverse "Noncitizensayswhat" strategy.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

What?

.... Damn, you got me

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 month ago

His office then edited the press release after publication, softening it by adding the word “potential” before noncitizens.

GOP are liars and exaggerators.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

In other words black people.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Don't forget the brown ones! And anyone with a D near their name...

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Abbot needs to sit on a splintery post and start spinning

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

What's the point? He doesn't feel a thing from the waste down.

[-] sudo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

You're suggesting this fucking ghoul feels anything at all.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago
[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Texas Tribune - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Texas Tribune:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.texastribune.org/2024/10/15/texas-noncitizen-voter-roll-removal-included-americans/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
228 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3316 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS