103
submitted 3 weeks ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/europe@feddit.org
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 45 points 3 weeks ago

Ugh, what a shit article. It mentions exactly one model, a Dacia, that has been already on the market for some time, and a Renault prototype coming maybe in 2026. There is nothing like what the headline suggests as far as I can tell.

[-] Phineaz@feddit.org 21 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks, I was afraid I had missed a wave of new releases of German car makers finally getting of their arses - not that I'd mind, but no, they didn't.

[-] Luccus@feddit.org 38 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

SUVs, anyone?

No?

We also have crossover SUVs.

Maybe a SUV mixed with a coupé?

Still no?

How about a Combi mixed with a SUV?

Our cheapest option?

That'll be 30.000€.

Electric? No. That one isn't electric.

For that you'll have to upgrade to our eSUV.

Why… why are you leaving?

[-] magikmw@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

Me in a dealership: shitty sedans and suvs. Oh, what's that? I left in a minivan.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 weeks ago

Very interesting. I wonder how those manufacturers are planning to make these cars cheaper? Do they just have a smaller battery, or do they go with LFP instead of NMC or NCA?

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

Or do they also get subsidiaries from their governments?

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ring-a-ding-ding-ding!

[-] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 12 points 3 weeks ago

probably buying batteries from china, since there is no one even close to competitve with them, like BYD's Blade battery. And then competing on everything else, for example by cutting down on all the superfluous crap they put in to massively overinflate car prices over the last 20 years.

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 7 points 3 weeks ago

Renault has been doing the Zoe at roughly this price point for about a decade already, although there was a monthly lease on the battery so there's an ongoing cost. I see quite a few of them going around here, though they're not a huge presence. They're simple but pleasant on the inside

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago

LOL, “batteries not included” has a whole new meaning now.

[-] cron@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

Not really. It is clearly a thing of the past, when batteries were expensive and not as reliable as today. Don't forget that the zoe was released 10 years ago.

[-] Fallenwout@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Probably still made in China.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

France is building it's own EV manufacturing infrastructure so no.

[-] Jayjader@jlai.lu 4 points 3 weeks ago

Good. Much better than that auto exec who was suggesting tariffs on imported EV vehicles would be needed to "save" Europe. I want to say it was BMW but that might just be my own bias against them speaking.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Ooh, Musky ain't gonna like this.

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago

Hasn't musk been losing traction in this game for a while now anyway? My understanding is that Tesla's whole initial selling point was that they disrupted the market and made electric vehicles something that people would want to buy, whilst the other automakers were 'technically' making EVs but making them look awful to keep the fuel industry alive.

Other automakers have woken up to the demand now and are making nice EVs. Unless Tesla can do something innovative that actually works consistently they're probably going to phase out.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

made electric vehicles something that people would want to buy

*people who were considering whether they wanted a Porsche or a Landrover. Selling Teslas to people who had $80,000 dollars to blow in 2015 is orthogonal wide adoption of EVs.

the other automakers were ‘technically’ making EVs

It's worse than that. California passed a law requiring the big automakers offer a non-fossil fuel vehicle. Most companies stuck electric or hydrogen motors in existing cars to make cheap garbage that technically met the requirements. GM spent half a billion developing the EV1. They released for lease-only in 1996 with a 160 mile range. They estimated a starting MSRP of $34,000 by 1999.

The customers loved them. Then California got rid of the law. And GM canceled the program. Thousands of customers sent checks trying to buy the cars. GM proceeded to revoke all leases, crush the cars, and sell the battery technology to Chevron.

[-] cron@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

It doesn't appear that Musk is interested in cheap electric cars. My guess is that the M3 is the smallest Tesla for a while.

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

I wonder what happens if you own a Chinese car but the car decides your social credit score isn't high enough to drive...

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
103 points (91.9% liked)

Europe

1509 readers
301 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS