841
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 36 points 56 minutes ago

As a middle manager in a corporate hellscape, one of my few joys in life is setting logic traps for HR and making them choose between admitting company policy is bullshit or directly instructing me to violate labor laws.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 9 points 48 minutes ago

Doing the Lord’s work there, Sonny!

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

if it's the latter, just get it in writing.

[-] Mojave@lemmy.world 19 points 54 minutes ago

Man we had someone in the army do this. Army doctrine is either outdated or very accessible to the poor, I don't fuckin know, but you aren't required to have a phone.

So this one weird junior Joe just decided he didn't need a phone. Got rid of it, and as a result never got the information he needed on army shit. I loved him for it, and by the law he was in the right. Can't tell him to get a phone.

Unfortunately I was his team lead, and every time my chain of command decided to put out bullshit last minute information over text I had to tell them to suck it and pvt NoPhone wouldn't be at their surprise formation.

Sometimes for important stuff I would have to drive to the barracks and knock on homies door to let him know there's surprise inspections or piss tests and shit.

The workplace should operate entirely without external communication. It worked since the dawn of man, and it should continue to work until the end of man if we want any semblance of work-life balance.

[-] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Big "thathappened" energy

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 27 points 3 hours ago

Keep telling the DBAs that my company outsourced a big chunk of their tech stack to that its against company policy to work all the way on the other side of the planet, but they refuse to show up to the office.

[-] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 138 points 4 hours ago

I always refused to put work apps on my personal phone because they would make you agree to some bullshit where they could remote access your phone or potentially wipe it. So I would refuse and say they needed to provide a company phone for me if it was that important. Most companies are either ok with this or provide a phone, except for one company. This was a software company, and literally everything else about this company was a unicorn of a job. But for some reason they wanted me to have slack on my phone and also wouldn't give me a company phone. So I dug up an old phone, reset it to factory settings, and added slack to that so I could say I did it. Then I put the phone away and they never asked about it again. So I really don't know what the point of that was 🤷

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I really don't mind these days as long as they have a MDM so I can have it on a separate profile, but without that I'm totally with you.

[-] classic@fedia.io 62 points 3 hours ago

It's less cognitively taxing for me if you just comply with whatever I've decided

[-] bulwark@lemmy.world 224 points 5 hours ago

The policy is you can only work from home when it benefits the company, not you.

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 65 points 5 hours ago

I'm learning that the hard way. Started working for this company 2 hours from home,because I could WFH 3 days a week. Now they want me to come in 4 days a week. So I'm looking for a new job now. Which is a shame, because I do like the job.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 72 points 5 hours ago

What does your contract say? With this back to work bullshit I made sure my contract explicitly said I was remote.

Doesn't mean they won't change their mind but maybe I'll get severance instead of fired for cause of they have a back to the office push.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

most hires don't get contracts

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Huh? All jobs come with an employment contract.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 44 minutes ago

You must not be in america. We're lucky if we get breaks.

[-] RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world 5 points 46 minutes ago

That's cute you believe that

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 45 points 5 hours ago

Good tip, I'll double check that

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 111 points 4 hours ago

Our boss was freaking out over people sometimes doing some private calls during work hours and at a certain point absolutely forbade it. So yeah, people would just end the call at 17:00 sharp and switch off the work phone. It took one week before that rule was rescinded.

[-] phx@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 minutes ago

And that's ridiculous on general because you know who also does regular work hours? Everyone else!

That means if you need a call with your doctor, bank, whatever, it's likely gonna be during the workday

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 37 points 2 hours ago

This reminds me of a work-to-rule or a "White Strike." It turns out that every company, even those that supposedly operate off of "unskilled" labor, utterly rely on employees making a ton of judgment calls and often working outside their job description. When employees start working to the letter of their job description, the whole operation quickly grinds to a halt.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

"Other duties as assigned" is a bitch.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

This is when "could you please send that request on writing via e-mail" becomes really useful.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

That's what gets struck in a white strike.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

If it's literally in your job description, as it has been in my last several positions, does it qualify?

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 minutes ago

A white strike, like all strikes works because of collective action, not because of some tricky technically lol.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 54 minutes ago

If everyone does it then it works.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Teamwork makes the dream work.

[-] bran_buckler@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

God, I hate how often my CEO says this

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 80 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

In all of my IT jobs I would have been fired if I had signed into work accounts on my personal phone. It's a pretty big security risk.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago

Eh, it doesn't need to be, you just need to do the work of putting together granular access controls that can account for your risk profiles.

The risk isn't much different between a company owned telephone and a personal telephone.
They're both susceptible to most of the same attacks, or being left on the bus.

[-] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 51 points 5 hours ago

True, but in small companies it's not uncommon.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
841 points (99.2% liked)

Malicious Compliance

13 readers
1041 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS