1042
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

A previous job of mine wanted people in my team to volunteer for being on call overnight for a week at a time.

No-one did, so they forced us. I emailed all managers involved including HR I said that I would like to opt-out for various reasons like family, mental and physical health, and also that the pay was in no way adequate for what they wanted. Again they pushed, so I replied with I'll do it but would be unavailable most afternoons and evenings with my kids and things they have on. That I also won't be able to answer after going to sleep because I take my mental health very seriously and need quality sleep to function.

So the first night I slept peacefully as I normally do as I have my phone set to go to DND automatically. I got called in because I didn't answer a call that came in last night, I asked when it was, about midnight, and said well that's because I was asleep.

Go to the next 2 mangers up, say the same thing and they say that I need to answer. I explain the email stating that I would be unable to answer calls at many times including when asleep and how no-one replied with that being a problem. One of the managers was like, wait up, you flagged this; yup; can you send me the email chain; yup. Got removed and told I wouldn't need to worry about doing it anymore.

It found a new job shortly after that.

[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

If you sort by new, the last time it was posted in !maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world was only 2 posts ago.

[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I wouldn't say that most things are bots. People often just repost things without looking at the place they post, or what the rules of that place are.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 hours ago

Doing home health was kinda instructive for me in this regard.

The only time you go to the office is to turn stuff in, do inservices/continuing education, or similar. But originally I would answer calls at weird hours because a patient would need coverage, otherwise they wouldn't be calling.

And then the management spent way too much money buying into some Disney corporate policy thing (literally, they paid money to Disney for the program) that changed a ton of rules in bullshit ways that made no sense for home health.

So, the next time they called, I didn't answer. Or the time after that, or the time after that. And, when you're one of three men working for a company that's partially reliant physical strength to be able to do the work needed for some patients, this alarmed my supervisor. She requested a meeting, and I went in. Mandatory meetings were paid though!

At the meeting, it was expressed that answering calls was part of my job. So I asked id I was being paid to sit at home and wait for calls. No, I wasn't "on call". So, you want me on call? No, just to answer when we call you. That's being on call, and we're supposed to get paid for that. No, this is different, we just want you to be available when someone calls out for a difficult patient. Soooo, you want me on call.

This went in circles for a while before I switched gears and directly said that answering calls when not on duty was not in place when I was hired, and that the employee handbook specified that being on call was considered a shift, and would be paid as such, and that maybe I should have been on call any of the dozens of times I did wake my ass up from sleep after workout two or three jobs in the first place, and that I never got paid a dime for doing so, so that was the end of it for me.

The response was that they couldn't stay operating if they paid everyone for being on call instead of us "supporting the company". My response was that maybe they could have if they hadn't shelled out for the Disney crap, or if the previous administrator hadn't been screwing around and embezzling, and that maybe it was time the company supported us.

Not surprisingly, I was one of several employees "let go to streamline services" a few weeks later, right before the company folded entirely.

So, you don't even have to have an office job to get treated like shit! Isn't that a relief? Isn't it?

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 108 points 5 hours ago

As a middle manager in a corporate hellscape, one of my few joys in life is setting logic traps for HR and making them choose between admitting company policy is bullshit or directly instructing me to violate labor laws.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 28 points 4 hours ago

Doing the Lord’s work there, Sonny!

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago

if it's the latter, just get it in writing.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

That's the goal.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

This is basically how I get new privileges at work...

Now if only I could convince them that I don't have enough hours to do my job, while still being able to do enough of my job without getting fired...

No really they cut my hours and I'm still pissed about it.

[-] Mojave@lemmy.world 61 points 5 hours ago

Man we had someone in the army do this. Army doctrine is either outdated or very accessible to the poor, I don't fuckin know, but you aren't required to have a phone.

So this one weird junior Joe just decided he didn't need a phone. Got rid of it, and as a result never got the information he needed on army shit. I loved him for it, and by the law he was in the right. Can't tell him to get a phone.

Unfortunately I was his team lead, and every time my chain of command decided to put out bullshit last minute information over text I had to tell them to suck it and pvt NoPhone wouldn't be at their surprise formation.

Sometimes for important stuff I would have to drive to the barracks and knock on homies door to let him know there's surprise inspections or piss tests and shit.

The workplace should operate entirely without external communication. It worked since the dawn of man, and it should continue to work until the end of man if we want any semblance of work-life balance.

[-] Vorticity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

If I had to guess, the reason for the lack of a phone requirement is that, if the army required everyone to have phones, the army would need to pay for them, too. I'm sure the army loves spending money on things like that.

[-] Southern_Yankee@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

As retired Army, this is freakin' phenomenal. I hope that dude is doing well today.

[-] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 175 points 8 hours ago

I always refused to put work apps on my personal phone because they would make you agree to some bullshit where they could remote access your phone or potentially wipe it. So I would refuse and say they needed to provide a company phone for me if it was that important. Most companies are either ok with this or provide a phone, except for one company. This was a software company, and literally everything else about this company was a unicorn of a job. But for some reason they wanted me to have slack on my phone and also wouldn't give me a company phone. So I dug up an old phone, reset it to factory settings, and added slack to that so I could say I did it. Then I put the phone away and they never asked about it again. So I really don't know what the point of that was 🤷

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

My current pet peeve is Email servers (MS Office) configured to only allow connections from outlook. I'd be happy to add an account to Aquamail but they won't let me. So no work emails on my phone or personal laptop.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

I really don't mind these days as long as they have a MDM so I can have it on a separate profile, but without that I'm totally with you.

[-] 200ok@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago
[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 hours ago

Mobile device management. Basically software to manage mobile devices owned by a company.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Or work profiles on BYODs

[-] classic@fedia.io 81 points 8 hours ago

It's less cognitively taxing for me if you just comply with whatever I've decided

[-] bulwark@lemmy.world 269 points 9 hours ago

The policy is you can only work from home when it benefits the company, not you.

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 85 points 9 hours ago

I'm learning that the hard way. Started working for this company 2 hours from home,because I could WFH 3 days a week. Now they want me to come in 4 days a week. So I'm looking for a new job now. Which is a shame, because I do like the job.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 90 points 9 hours ago

What does your contract say? With this back to work bullshit I made sure my contract explicitly said I was remote.

Doesn't mean they won't change their mind but maybe I'll get severance instead of fired for cause of they have a back to the office push.

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 51 points 9 hours ago

Good tip, I'll double check that

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 41 points 7 hours ago

Keep telling the DBAs that my company outsourced a big chunk of their tech stack to that its against company policy to work all the way on the other side of the planet, but they refuse to show up to the office.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 135 points 9 hours ago

Our boss was freaking out over people sometimes doing some private calls during work hours and at a certain point absolutely forbade it. So yeah, people would just end the call at 17:00 sharp and switch off the work phone. It took one week before that rule was rescinded.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 62 points 6 hours ago

This reminds me of a work-to-rule or a "White Strike." It turns out that every company, even those that supposedly operate off of "unskilled" labor, utterly rely on employees making a ton of judgment calls and often working outside their job description. When employees start working to the letter of their job description, the whole operation quickly grinds to a halt.

[-] mrecondo@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 hours ago

Here we call it "standard operation" and it's also a kind of "white strike"

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 24 points 6 hours ago

"Other duties as assigned" is a bitch.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 21 points 6 hours ago

This is when "could you please send that request on writing via e-mail" becomes really useful.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] phx@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

And that's ridiculous on general because you know who also does regular work hours? Everyone else!

That means if you need a call with your doctor, bank, whatever, it's likely gonna be during the workday

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 90 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

In all of my IT jobs I would have been fired if I had signed into work accounts on my personal phone. It's a pretty big security risk.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1042 points (98.6% liked)

Malicious Compliance

13 readers
1357 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS