206
submitted 2 weeks ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org

Furniture giant IKEA has agreed to pay 6 million euros ($6.5 million) towards a government fund compensating victims of forced labor under Germany’s communist dictatorship, in a move campaigners hope will pressure other companies to follow.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 2 weeks ago

"After it became known that the company was involved in forced prison labor, IKEA accepted our invitation to talk."

So from the sound of it IKEA didn't give two shits as long as no one knew, just like any other big company. You cannot tell me that people at IKEA simply didn't know, someone knew.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty much everyone knew but OTOH it's not like they were making contracts with prisons, they had contracts with ordinary GDR companies which used prison labour to supplement their own workforce, often on an irregular basis. E.g. if you had a contract with a GDR company to supply a certain number of t-shirts per month for three years, they'd do it with their own workforce, they'd get another short-term contract and fulfil part of that and part of your contract with prison labour. The whole economy was infested with it, basically impossible to do business with the GDR and not have prison labour involved somewhere in the supply chain. What are you expecting, you're doing business with tankies.

I'd see stronger culpability if they had been contracting out dangerous work. GDR wasn't stellar at work safety in general, not atrocious either, but prison labour in e.g. the chemical industry? It's not that they didn't gave a fuck, it was extra unsafe by design.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago

Of course they knew. For Ingvar Kamprad, it was all about saving money. No matter what.

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

I am sure Ikea will acknowledge having contributed to illegal deforestation of original forests in Romania, Belarus, and Russia in the 2020s at some point, too.

[-] Imhotep@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

This was slavery, in the eighties, and Ikea figured they could benefit from it (they 100% knew) and save what I suppose was an absurd amount of money

40 years later they pay 6 millions

I know many corporations are awful but we should't become desensitized. How can you still shop there knowing this

[-] ridago@programming.dev 12 points 2 weeks ago

Because they are currently the only company acknowledging their fault? Boycotting them while ignoring all the other companies benefiting from the exact same practice seems counterproductive…

[-] Imhotep@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They didn't reveal the information, the former prisoners first shone light on it when they asked for compensation.
They only felt like they had to make amends once the story came out, not during the 30 years prior. strange how that goes

Take control of the narrative.

Pay a research group to confirm what has already been revealed. On the wikipedia page it almost seems like the whole thing was their idea

(from a quick search this was revealed in 2011 by a german media, opening Stasi files)

And it works too

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is in no way a defense, but rather an accusation: many other companies pull or have pulled similar things. Hasbro famously used near slave labor when they partnered with Good Shepherd Sisters, one of many similar "Magdalene Laundries"; religious convents that some women were put in for sins as horrifying as "having a baby out of wedlock."

Behind the Bastards discusses them in their episodes titled "How the catholic church murdered Ireland's babies"

[-] dontgooglefinderscult 20 points 2 weeks ago

So prison labor for profit is bad now? When is the EU going to completely sanction the US then?

[-] 0x815@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

So prison labor for profit is bad now?

It should be a matter of course, but the EU already banned forced labour explicitly this years. The question is rather that we must ensure that the law is enforced.

[-] polluteyourjorts@lemmy.one 17 points 2 weeks ago

At first glance I thought this was satirical, implying ikea was fined for making people build their own furniture.

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
206 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

1555 readers
383 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS