1301
9, 8, 7, 6, 5... (lemmy.world)
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago
[-] Ardyssian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

LMAO where is this picture from

[-] infinite_ass@leminal.space 6 points 19 hours ago

Disney World.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago
  1. Get a job working for Google making anti-adblockers.

  2. Use your 20% time contributing to FOSS stealth adblocker and anti-anti-adblockers.

  3. ???

  4. Profit for life

[-] yogi_pogi@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

This was actually my life a few years ago.

I was hardening our applications to stop scraping and automation bots.

Then contributing to open-source to have better scraping and automation.

I wasn't purposely creating loop holes or anything because that's highly illegal. It's about making sure both sides "play nice", because the automation bots are frequently used by spammers/evildoers.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago

More like

Skip beating in 30 seconds

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 106 points 1 day ago

I would accept "I work for the team that tries to detect ad blockers on YouTube, and slow down the process with bureaucracy."

[-] eyeon@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

just say I help improve ad blockers on YouTube and refuse to elaborate.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

colleague of the marketing guy that just makes up metrics to pretend to his boss and stakeholders that their work on ads makes any difference

laudable professionals

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Boys, we did it. We made a right with two wrongs!

[-] Thoven@lemdro.id 39 points 1 day ago

Cards on the table: for Google money I'd do it too. If they want to enshittify their product until the competition has a fighting chance, who am I to stop them? Sure, it's an annoying and anticonsumer thing to do. But making a "free" product's bad qualities harder to circumvent isn't the ethical hill I'm going to die on.

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

I would take the job just to make sure we can sabotage it. And I'm not even affected by their adblocker detection; I just yt-dlp and NewPipe the videos.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 25 points 1 day ago

But, who's their competitor? They have none. All the other alternative have very specific community (artsy short film, science, etc)

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago
[-] gregor@gregtech.eu 8 points 1 day ago

And it sucks, not a lot of them federate because video storage is expensive

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

For Google money I'd do it too...but I wouldn't do a very good job of it

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I don't really get the argument here. As much as it sucks, it's not nearly as morally reprehensible as something like weapons. If you don't do it someone else will. It's not something a handful of devs are gonna make a difference in by boycotting and it isn't worth being fired over or not accepting a job over.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Last time i watched youtube unprotected it had a higher fcking ad frequency than television. And they were put in the stupidest places imaginable, making the video unwatchable. And i'm fucking genx, so i grew up way before the concept of avoiding ads.

There's funding your product then there's just being a piece of shit

[-] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago

Advertising is absolutely morally reprehensible. It is propaganda that exists only to manipulate people into buying shit they didn't want or need. And it turns out that mindless consumerism is destroying society and our planet.

[-] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 19 hours ago

You can't make better people and better cattle at the same time.

Imagine you were a billionaire. Which do you want?

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I never said it wasn't morally reprehensible. Only that it's less morally reprehensible than something like making weapons.

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 day ago

10 seconds? That's generous.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago

This is programmer humor.

10...

1...

  1. Why are you still here?
[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

"You literally said 'ten' and then 'one', why do you think I'm still here?"

[-] kolorafa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

“There are only 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don’t.”

https://www.exploringbinary.com/there-are-10-types-of-people/

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

He either said "two" (10) "one" (1) "zero" (0) "why are you still here" (because the guy is unfazed)
or he said "ten" (10) "one" (1) "zero" (0) "why are you still here" (because the guy is confused)

I'm guessing the second one occured

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Why would you convert to decimal naming conventions when using a binary numbering system? Or do you think numeric values like 42(dec) have inherent names? That's as silly as thinking that the freezing point of water is 0 degrees or, even worse, 32 degrees.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I'm trying to show that the joke only works as a written premise, and falls apart immediately as a spoken premise as was presented initially.

[-] And009@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

Looks like we have an outsider here *cocks gun

[-] Gumus@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Ya filthy animal!

[-] bestelbus22@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Video hosting costs a lot of money. I wouldn't expect that to be delivered for free

[-] HStone32@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

They had a good thing going. YouTube was far from unprofitable. But the skyrocketing density and plummeting quality of ads drove people to adblockers.

I suspect though, the day will soon come when ad-space is no longer quite so valuable.

[-] Johanno@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

Well then make Premium a reasonable price.

And just don't provide stuff for free. Nobody forces alphabet to provide youtube without account and for free.

It was a money sink since Google created it

[-] eyeon@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

They don't provide stuff for free, they provide stuff in exchange for your data and to sell ads.

[-] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 4 points 23 hours ago

Bough it

Twish it!

Pull it!

(Yeah I know this joke is a stretch lmao)

[-] NightmareQueenJune@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Stretch it!

[-] bigFab@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Youtube servers are terrible. Why not focus on offering a smoother experience? Then charge what you want.

[-] bestelbus22@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

What's terrible about them? I have no issues here in west Europe

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
1301 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

32396 readers
672 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS