191
That's the deal.
Literally.
And yet I'll still be called a conspiracy theorist for mentioning it.
We're in a timeline now in which truth is entirely irrelevant.
Trump supporters are necessarily one of two things - deluded or dishonest. Either they've been manipulated into not seeing the plain fact that he's a corrupt and self-serving autocrat and an existential threat to the US, or they know exactly what he is and just don't admit it publicly.
In either case, truth and reality count for nothing.
And you're just being alarmist for suggesting that he'll do the things he's literally promised that he will do. He's obviously joking when he's talking about tariffs and deportations and using the military against "the enemy from within" and "finishing the job" in Palestine. Because, you see, Kamala laughed too much or something.
Well, prior to the election, mentioning Project 2025, even when it was published, and in writing, was having people get called conspiracy theorists, too, so....
I believe it’s The Art of the Deal.
Newsweek has contacted Trump's team for comment.
They should cut out the middle men and just ask the Kremlin directly.
So even the Kremlin is admitting the election was rigged in some way by their people. Fucking great.
Huh, you don't say.
The qons, the tankies, the Enlightened Centrists (TM) have all been telling me that Russian collusion was a "hoax".
Yup, he owes all the little nazis dinner at the white house, and you're paying for it. That's the bad news. The good news is it's McDonald's and there's a good chance of ecoli.
Or listeria...
Well yes but what are they going to do about it now? It's not like he needs to be put in power again, and literally any scandal will fall off him like water on a duck
I was thinking about this. How funny would it be if Trump just... Did nothing? Refused to sign legislation, made zero executive orders, just golfed for four years straight? It's not like he needs to keep people happy so they'll re elect him, he's no longer eligible to run.
The problem is that winning only postponed his problems for four years, and he certainly is already worried about when that time comes. He'll be looking for a solution, and for that he'll need the favor of people in power. So it's amusing to think he might just chill, but I really doubt he will :(
My conspiracy theory is that Trump will be a useful idiot until he's not, in which case he will be replaced one way or another by JD Vance.
I keep saying this also... Vance doesn't talk like he's just some VP dude trying to fix some random cause... He is planning on saying trump is unfit the first chance he gets... I believe a lot of them are actually tired of trump but he's so good for them this is their chance...
I’d call it more a deep seated fear for me than theory. Vance is the riches actual play
If he lives that long ... He's out of shape, he has had major health issues recently... He doesn't eat very healthy... And he's going to be the oldest president by the end of his term beating out Biden who if I'm not mistaken was too old...
I thought of that too, but I don't think Trump's ego allows him to consider that he might die some day.
I'm not sure that he's even mentally capable of the abstraction necessary to consider such a thing. If he did a freaky Friday body swap with a somehow horny 7 year old boy, I'm not sure we'd ever know the difference. Dude likes trucks and cops and hamberders, and has absolutely zero media literacy and introspection skills.
That's kind of accurate and it's weird that I've never thought about that before
If there’s anything American society has taught me over the years, it’s that good things happen to rich people - whether they’re good or bad is irrelevant.
If he refused to do the job I'm sure the 25th would be invoked immediately.
The PACs alone spent like a billon or whatever, that def wasn't free for neither candidate.
The keys to power...
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
191 points (99.5% liked)
politics
19096 readers
3287 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS