376
Defenestration (sh.itjust.works)
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Here in California, they have decided that the best strategy is to tear down their camps and throw them in jail. Cuz that'll solve everything.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

That way the state can make money off of them via slave labor.

Nah the state doesnt make money. The state pays the prison with taxes and then the privately owned prison loans out its slaves for to get even more profit

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

California actually has no private prisons, for what that's worth. But that doesn't mean state and federal prisons can't be for-profit.

State and federal prisons contract their inmates out to businesses through "work reform" programs to make things like cheap dorm furniture or food products. The business pays the prison for a contract, and the prisoners work for free or for a small credit they can spend at the prison comissary. Or sometimes it reduces the debt they get stuck with when they leave prison, because the government bills people for the cost of their own incarceration.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] Trollivier@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Here in Montreal they just tear down their camps and hope they will go away.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Canada's weather is a natural deterrent.

And by deterrent I mean they dead.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

He's right, we have enough houses. Over 20 per homless person

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It's weird how people here this that's the only issue. They don't realize how many mentally ill people are incapable of living a regular life in a home with a job, etc. Just giving someone a house isn't gonna fix their mental health issues

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Although I support the idea, simplifying the problem to one of only supply and demand doesn't address the core issues of mental health, substance abuse and physical disabilities that might have in great part contributed to the individual being unhoused. Along with affordable housing and free temporary housing we need to also provide free resources to help individuals get back on their feet (as a matter of speaking).

[-] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

But housing does solve someone being homeless...

[-] ahornsirup@feddit.org -1 points 1 day ago

Not if they're immediately kicked out again because of damage to the home or because they're intolerable and/or dangerous to the neighbours. And that's not even accounting for the people who have more invisible mental health issues that still prevent them from holding a job and paying their rent/mortgage without permanent government assistance. If you want to fix homelessness you need to address mental health as well as housing. Neither is optional, it needs to be both.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Can confirm. Talked to a few homeless and I think most are mentally unfit to seek help, apply for government programmes, work or even care for a home they would get for free. Those people belong in some asylum where they get therapy.

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Please tell me how one would stay safe, sane, and sober without a roof over one's head, a door one can lock, and food in one's stomach?

Shelter is the next need up from food in the pyramid of needs. Solve that first for a strong foundation for a life.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

You missed my point. To address the issue of homelessness, you need to attack all of the underlying issues at once, not just lack of shelter.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We need to build up. Nimbys need to stfu.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
376 points (98.5% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

218 readers
223 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' etc.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS