470
What's Mastodon precious? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 3 points 16 minutes ago

If Mastodon wanted to be preferred, it should have been better. I moved to Mastodon over a year ago when the Twitter sale first happened. It was not great then and it’s gotten slightly worse since. I created a Bluesky account two fats ago and it already offers exactly the experience I missed from Twitter before Elon.

Would it be better if Mastodon was good and the federated FOSS option was superior? Sure, absolutely. But, that scenario isn’t even close to the case we are presented with.

[-] andrewthe95th@lemmy.world 94 points 2 hours ago

I feel like you guys are addicted to letting perfect be the enemy of good. Yes, Bluesky being corporate run will probably be an issue down the line, but if it becomes mainstream then people will be used to seeing .APP.INSTANCE and feel more comfortable with the fediverse interface, which I know at least for me was a big hurdle. Like seriously, the fact that the next big thing is federated, even if in name only, is a big step forward.

[-] xavier_berthiaume@jlai.lu 16 points 57 minutes ago

Yeah I'm a huge believer in federated systems but I believe that a lot of 'normies' going to bluesky is a huge step in the right direction. Even though most don't know anything about the tech behind it and migrate because twitter has become a bot infested right wing hell scape, they still are one step closer to being fully integrated to the fediverse.

[-] airportline@lemmy.ml 11 points 41 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

Bluesky's ActivityPub support is also leagues better than Threads because of Bridgy Fed. At least a Bluesky user and a Mastodon user can follow each other and have a back-and-forth conversation.

[-] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

I just looove how ppl believe that switching from one VC-funded centralised corpo platform to another VC-funded (slitghly less) centralised corpo platform is a good thing /s

Just because it's (partially) OSS doesn't make it good. The corp still hold all the power and might sell out, but at least they got free volunteers to program for them so the C-level could get more money!

(Now don't tell me that Bluesky is "federated". They still hold all the power over site rules and moderation. The only little concession you get is that you are allowed to host your own data)

Apparently virtue signaling about pseudofederation is enough for libs to "get hope for the future of the internet" while they happily lick the boot of yet another centralized "trust me bro this isn't going to eshittify itself, not this time" corp

[-] Donkeytown@lemmy.today 24 points 3 hours ago

After initially hesitating, I decided to join Bluesky after having previously tried Mastodon and permanently leaving Twitter. While I was initially reluctant because Jack Dorsey had sold Twitter to Elon Musk, I still created a Bluesky account. I later came across Jason Koebler's article on 404 Media, which validated my choice. His arguments aligned with my own reasons for preferring Bluesky over Mastodon. Link to the article: The Great Migration to Bluesky Gives Me Hope for the Future of the Internet.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 46 points 4 hours ago

Jumping from one frying pan into the next.

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago

lucky for us, we aren't running out of jumps.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 34 points 4 hours ago
[-] atro_city@fedia.io 63 points 4 hours ago

Pseudo-federated from what people are saying. Something about the user accounts being centralised but the data being decentralised. I don't understand but it's something funded by the previous owner of Twitter and full of other corporate money, so I wouldn't trust it.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 39 points 4 hours ago

there is a critical 'relay' component that only they control. so you can setup your own 'node', but only connected to their instance.

only a single instance of the relay exists and they are not releasing that code and a few other pieces. it federates only with itself.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 32 points 4 hours ago

That pretty much sounds centralised. But I guess people don't care if they don't have to worry about "picking a server" which is "too complicated" 🤷

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 4 hours ago

i think the new paradigm of the distributed fediverse is going to take a long time to propagate to the masses. its going to be lots of platforms advertising their corner of the 'verse and the features they permit.. but we really need to get the idea of the 'fediverse' into their heads that its content accessible by any of those platforms.

the thing ive noticed is no one cares about 'sites' anymore.. the kids all want 'apps' which is drivin me bonkers. spent decades building mobile-friendly, dynamic viewports only for them to get ignored cuz kids dont want to type in a URL/domain.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 10 points 2 hours ago

My impression is that it hasn't been users that have pushed everything into apps, it's been publishers. This is all a part of a general trend where software has become much less about what it can do for the user, and much more about what data it can extract from a user for the publisher. Websites generally have a lot more protections against such data scraping, meanwhile you can put who knows what code into an app.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 hours ago

If you look at how RSS fell from use, there were two major issues. On the user side, users had to go out to find content as there wasn't an inherent way to search for content within the system. On the creator side, creators had to deal with advertising themselves to users and they had to handle the monetization by themselves.

Social media created the algorithm to find content and developed some revenue sharing with creators.

If federated media takes off, it will probably look like Threads or Truth Social, where control of a front end monetizes development of the platform.

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

you pick a server with bluesky

[-] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 hours ago

That’s exactly what people want: no brainer alternative without the fediverse’s fragmentation

[-] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 hours ago

In theory, yes. In practice, it's a bit different. At the very least for now.

https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/113487613965056474

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 4 hours ago

well, until they release all the code, and allow full federation its not a federating platform. end of story.

[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 hours ago

I believe it's sort of tacked on and not exactly federated at the moment. Also it's corporate run

[-] missingno@fedia.io 10 points 4 hours ago

It calls itself federated, but it's false advertising.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

In theory, yes / kind of.

In practice, no, not really.

It uses a different protocol (AT protocol) than the Fediverse ActivityPub protocol, which is what lemmy and mastadon and pixelfed are all built on, so it is not natively interoperable with ActivityPub based Fediverse.

To do that you have to use bridging software of some kind.

Also, as others have pointed out... even if you do make the approximate equivalent of your own instance, a PDS... all of these still go through 'Relays', which BlueSky controls.

So... it is technically federated in the sense that it allows for anyone to make their own instance/PDS... but ultimately it is actually totally centralized.

Instead of a web or weave of many to many connections of independent admins/maintainers, the structure much more resembles a top down hierarchy that is ultimately all controlled by a profit driven corporation.

If the Relays go down, everything goes down.

If BlueSky decides they don't appreciate your instance, they have unitary power to delist or block it, from everyone.

As compared with the Fediverse, where many different instances and communities can all pick and choose for themselves which other instances and communities they do and do not federate with, and where an outage particular to one community/instance only bricks that particular community/instance.

[-] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 4 hours ago

seriously.

please show me a single, fully independant instance of their platform that federates.

you cant, because it doesnt exist.

[-] natecox@programming.dev 8 points 2 hours ago

I mean, ATP has only been around for two years, mastodon has been around for 8 years with 6 years of development on AP.

Development takes time, I feel like “show it to me now or it’s a lie” is a poor take.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

The code for their instance isn't open source, so it's legitimately impossible to host another relay. So until that changes, yes, it's a lie

[-] solarvector@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 hours ago

Bluesky Social has pledged to transfer the protocol's development to a standards body such as the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) in the near future.[11]

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 20 points 4 hours ago

Let’s see it then. I’m concerned when the opportunity to profit arises that perverse motives will occur.

[-] solarvector@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago

Absolutely agree. An aspirational goal to an open standard is not an open standard.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
470 points (95.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26821 readers
2831 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS