211
submitted 10 hours ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@lemmy.world

Oz, who has a history of making degrading remarks about women, has no government experience. As a candidate for Senate in 2022, he expressed opposition to abortion at any point in pregnancy.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Juigi@lemm.ee 1 points 12 minutes ago

Nothing surprises me anymore. Reap what you sow americans.

[-] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 minutes ago

The result of the "Golden Age of Television"

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

It almost seems like he is assembling a heist team. Oh wait...

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Next up on FarceNews: Trump's newest picks to include Cap'n Crunch (Secretary of Defense), Scrooge McDuck (Treasury), and Smokey the Bear (Education).

[-] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago
  • Smokey Bear
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Fuggin clown shoes.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

The dude that killed all those dogs?

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 110 points 10 hours ago

I see a pattern, it's the people he watches for years on TV and likes who he puts into leading positions.

To be honest this seems in character for the USA, this is what the american people are often doing too, putting celebrities from movies and TV in charge of their country, case in point Reagan, Schwarzeneger and Trump.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

You can kick and scream but Trump really is the embodiment of America.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

To be honest I was very worried that he would assign competent and evil people to his cabinet positions. Somewhat relieved that he has only appointed clowns so far.

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

Judge Judy is his next SC pick isn't she?

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

She would actually be a good one.

Judy is tough, but fair. I love her.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 0 points 4 hours ago

Cool but does she have a scholarly understanding of constitutional law?

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

She was a real judge before she was a TV judge, so yeah.

[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Better than most of Trump's lawyers.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Gil Scott Heron called it years ago. B Movie. From Shogun to Raygun....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlVgtckqSaY

But, oh yeah, I remember
In this year that we have now declared
The year from Shogun to Ray-Gun
I remember what I said about Ray-Gun...meant it
Acted like an actor...Hollyweird
Acted like a liberal
Acted like General Franco when he acted like Governor of California
Then he acted like a Republican
Then he acted like somebody was going to vote for him for President
And now we act like 26% of the registered voters is actually a mandate
We're all actors in this, I suppose
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 27 points 10 hours ago
[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 13 points 9 hours ago

I had a look at the list you linked and was surprised to see the list pointing out Germans and Polish people so I looked a bit dealer.

The German guy was in the left party which is so small that they always have trouble to get over the 5℅ necessary to be in the Bundestag, so he has never been in any leading position. And even the nomination to become president failed. And even if he became a president, in Germany that is not a leading position, a president just represents a country like a King.

In Poland, for Lech Kaczyński (who was the president of Poland) the wikipedia article down not even mention his work as an actor. On IMDB 4 entries are there. He was voice acting for a animated movie as a 13 years old and this is the biggest of the movies he was involved. The next next is a documentary, so he is not acting. The next one is a special episode of a game show to which politicians have been invited as participants. So no acting here either.

The next from Poland Jarosław Kaczyński, the twin brother also only had the voice acting as a 13 years old and documentaries where he didn't act listed on his IMDB page.

The third and last polish guy in the lis fits the description of a celebrity and politician in power, he was elected into parlament.

For Sweden nobody is listed. Same for South Korea. So from the countries I lived in my feeling that this doesn't happen is supported by the list you linked.

But other Asian countries, god damn! The lists for India, the Philippines and so on are soooo long! I didn't expect it. So it's really different in different countries.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 9 hours ago

"it's ok because other people do it" is not a good argument.

Also, the scale of any activity subject to that excuse is relevant. Many electorates occasionally act weird, some electorates are notorious for the same acts.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 12 points 9 hours ago

The tone of the post I was replying to was 'Look at these silly Americans, doing silly American things'; I was just pointing out that it's not exclusively an American thing. Not saying it's good.

Zelenskyy was the first one that came to my mind and I was actually just looking for how to properly spell his name (is it 1 y or 2? Various sources use one or the other and there's no consistency), and found that page linked from his Wikipedia page (which lists it as 2 ys, for the record), so I linked to it instead of just naming Zelenskyy as my example.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 hours ago

I was thinking of Zelenskyy too. No other country's election news makes it to my eyes, so there's an inherent bias in what I have 'in mind'.

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 5 points 10 hours ago

Yeah that is true, but I also did not claim that. Anyway I have a hard time finding any celebrity in office in the countries I lived in (Poland, Germany, Sweden, South Korea), doesn't mean it doesn't happen though, just that it looks to happen much less often.

[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

I mean, the governator wasn't actually that bad in fact I remember a lot of positive stories, but I could be wrong

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 hours ago

Didn't Arnie do a decent job, though? I didn't live in California during his time in office, but it sounded mostly positive.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

Yeah. He got a bunch of parks built, and a bunch of other things to improve basic qol.

[-] qantravon@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

As I understand it, Arnie is actually fairly intelligent, and also surrounded himself with competent people who knew how to do the jobs he asked of them.

[-] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Arnie is actually fairly intelligent, and also surrounded himself with competent people

This is really the key factor. His acting chops probably just helped him convince people to vote for him; it wasn't all there was to him.

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 5 points 10 hours ago

I did not want to put in any judgment on how well celecreties do in office, it was just an observation that this doesn't really seem to happen in other countries to this extend. But there instead mostly professional politicians or scientists like Angela Merkel run the show.

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

We've always nominated celebrities into higher office. In the early years of the country, celebrities were just generals. Still well known, voted because they were likely well known, just not what we would consider "celebrities" today. The effectiveness of these candidates could easily be disputed. But people vote because the name is familiar and not because of their policies. I have a feeling with all the muckraking and "alternative facts" today, the louder name will continue to have more chances than they should otherwise.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 56 points 10 hours ago

The US is officially a joke.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 29 points 10 hours ago

🌏👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀🌌

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago

We've been a joke for a long time. We the people are finally learning the rest of the world isn't laughing with us...

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago

I used to live in England back in 1999-2004 on and off during the summer with my mom. Even then we were a fucking joke. I learned very quickly to lose my Texas accent and just tell people I was Canadian. I literally almost got my ass kicked several times after 9/11 when my fellow Brits found out I was from America. I wasn't even old enough to vote at the time. I haven't been back since 2009 but I suspect nowadays they'd just feel sorry for me. I live in California now which is rife with it's own problems but at least my family and I feel somewhat safer here than in Oklahoma or Texas where we lived most our lives. I couldn't raise my daughter in Oklahoma and feel that in doing what's best for her. Plus California is fucking beautiful and there's so much to do and see! Cost of living is the only downside here for me.

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Why almost get beat up post 9/11?

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

A lot of it is nervous laughter now but I'm sure it's the same down there now too.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 32 points 9 hours ago

Thank you Oprah, very cool!

[-] hOrni@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Bet she didn't see this coming when she was promoting this hack.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

It was him, it would be another stupid TV doctor.

[-] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 8 hours ago

Dr Nick would be preferred

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

Ugh. Somebody totally fucking called this the other day.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It was me. Sort of, I figured he’d be Surgeon General. I fucking hate this.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Well CUT IT OUT, then!

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 hours ago

Oh look, the hilarious consequences of our own actions. Hey pensioners, I hope this was what you had in mind if you voted R!

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
211 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3483 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS