88
submitted 2 weeks ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

The rising practice of shaking down customers to pay for security shortfalls could have a silver lining for CISOs, as diluted price competitiveness could convince top brass of the ROI of cybersecurity investments.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago

Are the other 37% lying or did they fold because of the breaches?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

It is click bait junk

[-] kryptonidas 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Companies pass costs to customers. How is this a news message? It’s literally what they always do.

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 weeks ago

You are not wrong. It's just extra special "fuck you" since they leak your personal data and then charge you more for it.

[-] cybermass@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalism without heavy democratic socialist regulations is doomed to destroy all that is good in society.

[-] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalism without social regulation is just fascism. The powerfull learned the hard way that doing fascism over night isn't nearly as effective as doing it over the span of decades. Now here we are the whole world under the thumb of super power fascist dictatorships. Yes America i mean you.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who else would pay for it?

Passing it on to consumers means that they will raise prices which will hurt says thus harming income. If they don't raise prices they lose money as well. At the end of the day they are paying for it directly and you are paying for it indirectly.

Best option is to completely abandon companies with terrible track records. These days pretty much every major company has had a breach. They key is how they handle it and how often it happens.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yea, but usually you pay to not have it leaked, rather than the other way around.

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 2 weeks ago

The other 37% don't "plan to", because they're already doing it.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

This is news? That number should be 100%.

Companies make money off if consumers. If they weren't passing there costs to consumers it would be tax funded.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1557 readers
325 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS