103
I mean, it's true that we have a two tiered justice system. Really it's like a four tiered justice system. But it's not split how they describe
It would be nice if the media could do their job and fight back against the fascists' consistent, purposeful repurposing of phrases used to describe real issues with unrelated horseshit.
The media is owned by the right who support this.
Remember the week or so that fake news meant the lies Trump was telling? He ran with it and turned it backwards so fast that now it's basically meaningless.
Are you now or have you been a member of the democratic party?
That's hilarious!
...and fucking REAL!?
Sadly, yes. The first "Russiagate for children" book. Also the first of 3.
https://www.goodreads.com/series/406877-the-plot-against-the-king
I am going to force the person who made this to drink their own bone marrow right out of the bone nerve endings and muscle still attached.
I have two thoughts on this:
It's a start.
And:
It's not much, but it's honest work.
good luck my friend.
Well I am glad someone likes my bloodthirsty madness.
I appreciate the creativity.
"like arresting Attorney General Merrick Garland"
...Yeah... Not a bad idea honestly. I'm no lawyerologist but criminal negligence could be applicable to that feckless jerk.
As insane as some of these Trump picks sound, in the case of Patel and a few others I wonder if they aren't just shrewd - they simply play up to MAGA and Trump because they've realized he's the most powerful man within the GOP and that his base provide a well of fanatical political loyalty they can tap into for their careers without necessarily meaning the crazy things they say.
What a fuckin' thing to have to hope for 😮💨
Unfortunately, that's not true for Patel. He's got a huge bone to pick with the government.
I'm not certain it's the same guy but one story I heard over the radio about a month ago that stuck with me was when he was early in his career (I think as a public defender), he was kicked out of a courtroom over a dress code violation by a judge who was a bit over the line. (Let me know if it's another person, this was before Kash was picked and the description fit, there aren't that many Indian guys in Trump's circle).
Situations of being disrespected in such a way radicalized people, and as far as I can tell, he's quite genuine in his beliefs about a deep state. That said, I'm with you on quite a few of the nominations and politicians in general. Marco Rubio, for instance, is probably just sucking MAGA cock.
So people who are going to be the people in power think there is a deep state? Are they not going to be exactly that.
I think people like Patel believe they'll challenge the establishment by being there, but they're also so unaware of the inner workings that it's not clear they know just who they want to stop. Just an aimless sense of spite.
Yep, that's more or less it. To add insult to injury, he wanted someone higher in his chain to fight for him or at least tell him he was a good boy. No one did, and his superiors basically shrugged and said, "Guess you should have had a tie or whatever." And he took that personally.
The sad thing is that it's a super relatable story. Everyone has been in his place at one point or another where they've essentially been set up for failure. Normal people, though, would just get over it and turn it into a funny story down the line about the stupid indignities of their position. It really shouldn't be a villain origin story.
Glad I remembered correctly. There's probably something else than that singular incident (like, to use a term he probably hates, microaggresions) but it really does sound like his villain origin story.
One must wonder: What turns someone into a Kash Patel vs. a Bernie Sanders type?
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
103 points (99.0% liked)
politics
19241 readers
1687 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS