372
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by brucethemoose@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Reality check: Trump pledged to end the program in 2016.

Called it. When push comes to shove, Trump is always going to side with the ultra-rich.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 52 points 6 days ago

The president made a statement, and trump agreed.

[-] 0000011110110111i@lemm.ee 59 points 6 days ago

Looks like Musk has the dirt on how the election was actually won. He has all the leverage he needs.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 60 points 6 days ago

Or trump just sides with the money. It's not always a conspiracy and it's a disservice to believe there is.

[-] GenXLiberal@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

I think it is exactly this simple: money.

The entire congress can be bought either outright or with the threat of a primary challenger that is extremely well funded. That will get whoever the ultra-rich wants in line.

We are entirely screwed. I hope I’m wrong though.

[-] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

I had a conversation with a coworker about this a while ago. He said that something he liked about trump was that he already had money so he wouldn't be able to be bought. I said that he has it exactly backwards. The kind of people who amass that amount of wealth in our society have felt the power of large wealth firsthand and know that more money is always better for them. Increasing the number in their bank account becomes exponentially more important, the higher it goes. The wealthy have proven their utmost allegiance to wealth, so they'll be the first to sell out.

There's an exchange in The Simpsons that has never stopped being relevant:

  • You know, Mr. Burns, you're the richest guy I know. Way richer than Lenny.
  • Oh, yes. But I'd trade it all for a little more.

Imagine betting that your prepper neighbor with 30 guns won't buy a 31st gun "because he already has so many".

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

Not necessarily. Trump can't pass legislation without Republican support in Congress, and those peope have their own values (and bribery goals). All of this before he takes power, and his power is only good for the next two years anyway.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Why two years? You think at the midterm Congress is gonna flip? Why not four assuming there’s still a presidential election…

[-] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

The man sent a literal mob to attack the capital, has been convicted of multiple crimes, and openly admitted to more. Teflon Don doesn't care about dirt.

[-] jason@discuss.online 6 points 6 days ago
[-] mercphilby@discuss.online 11 points 6 days ago

Correct. He has the dirt on how trump rapes children.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago

We all already do, and the electorate didn't care.

[-] mercphilby@discuss.online 2 points 6 days ago

That’s why they voted for him.

💲💲💲

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Musk does apparently have a spy network, too. There was a podcast series on it....Elon's Spies.

[-] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

350 million people in the US and none of them are talented enough for this guy. The government had 350 million chances to educate and professionalize, and here we are outsourcing to India because Musk isn't happy with the current crop.

Lmao

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

H1B workers kept Twitter from imploding. They couldn’t quit unless they had a new job lined up. They couldn’t complain about having to sleep in the office or they might get deported.

Native US workers could just walk out.

This is why Muskrat loves visa workers

[-] wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 6 days ago

That's because this crop doesn't want to work for tree fiddy and on 4h of sleep every day. How is he gonna wipe his tears with money if he has to pay people?

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

We don't want to work for him or for what he's offering.

[-] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

And of course is has nothing to do with talent and training at all, the US (and many others) created the system where you put yourself into huge debts to get the education the companies need from you, and then they also don't want to pay you a wage that will allow you to live comfortably and crawl out of that debt.

So then they buy the government and arrange for people with similar education, who are more desperate, less informed of labour laws and unable to switch jobs when they get here.

[-] heavy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Right?

Let there be no mistake, it's not about talent so much as it is about keeping wages low. Many tech companies do this explicitly, especially since interest rates rose and investing money stopped being free.

Anecdotally, I was at a company and was instructed not to hire in the US. I could choose Montréal, a few countries in Europe, or Isreal.

US was off limits, not enough budget.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Many of them have been doing this shit since the 90s. When I read about how "we no find coderz in the U.S!" I know it's complete horse manure. I suppose there are some niche fields where it might actually be hard to source certain types of engineers or what have you.

But seriously, programming? You cannot find that locally? GTFO with that...

For a brief blip there I hoped that agent orange might actually blow up H-1B, even if for the wrong reasons, but this outcome (moneyed interests calling the tune) is entirely expected, I guess. Even if his racist base haaaaaates it.

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 days ago

Of course because hes a subby wubby bottom cuck boy so he does what master says

[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Wow, he didn't even wait until inauguration to stab his dipshit cultists in the back...

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 days ago

Now his minions will struggle to change their rhetoric to figure out how they agree with him.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Like I told my buddy earlier. Give Murdoch 2 weeks and they'll fall in line.

[-] shield_gengar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

Oh no damn that sucks; sad I thought he cared about you :(

[-] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago

there it is

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
372 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19274 readers
1973 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS