Unfortunate but unsurprising.
Edwards is the only Democratic governor in the south.
Like Manchin being replaced by a Republican in WV, this was only a matter of time for Louisiana
He’s atrocious even by LA standards, a cross of David Duke and Ken Paxton.
Edwards is the only Democratic governor in the south.
Did Andy Bershear stop being a Democrat or did Kentucky stop being in the South?
Had the same thought. We got Roy Cooper here in NC as well
Deep South would be more accurate
Rephrase in an edit.
The north south divide used to run from Texas across to north Caroline's coast. But the mason-dixon line shifted things.
It is complicated history and the more I read the less I can keep track of enough to make a summary of it.
People believe the reason TN/KY border is flat is because it lines up with the Mason-Dixon line, but people don't really critically analyse history, so KY often gets called the North even though that state is where the line began shifting northward to the Virginias
Let them suffer under their vote.
Turnout was terrible, the leading dem had a very very lackluster campaign, it's a jungle primary system so there was hope if there was a runoff but people didn't show up to the polls and this is our reckoning. Hopefully it's not as bad as it appears it can be.
If Democrats are good at anything, it's snatching defeat from the jaws if victory.
But I didn't vote for this man.
Did you vote in this election?
I never miss a chance to get my sticker.
From someone originally from Louisiana, this is so bad. He’s young enough to have learned all the tips & tricks from his older cohorts. He actively opposed & stalled/stopped a lot of the previous governor’s ideas. There is nothing good to say about him…he will suck up to the people on the Hill like Steve Scalise & Ted Cruz & try to ride their coattails higher. He is a true piece of shit.
Sucks to be Louisiana.
Yup. Sorry, New Orleans. I guess they will soon find out (again) why they need to make the effort to vote. Was being Mississippi not enough of a threat?
Always has.
If you need a window into Landry's (lack of) character;
"Landry's brother, Nick, who is openly gay, opposes the attorney general on LGBT issues: "I can't remain silent any longer, because although I am not political, I am a human being, and I just want my rights, my unalienable rights. Those of you who are worried, who are in the same position as me and who may not have an attorney general for a brother, I want you to know I stand with you guys and those who want to be married, and I'll do anything I can do to support anyone and any organization."
Any reason to believe this pile of dump actually pushed him over the line? versus just latching on when it was obvious candidate would already win (in however broken I imagine the system in Louisiana is)?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Attorney General Jeff Landry, a rightwing Republican backed by Donald Trump, has won the Louisiana governor’s race, holding off a crowded field of candidates.
Landry will replace current governor John Bel Edwards, who was unable to seek re-election due to consecutive term limits.
More recently, Landry has been in the spotlight over his involvement and staunch support of Louisiana laws that have drawn much debate, including banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youths, the state’s near-total abortion ban that doesn’t have exceptions for cases of rape and incest, and a law restricting youths’ access to “sexually explicit material” in libraries, which opponents fear will target LGBTQ+ books.
However the Republican has also repeatedly put Louisiana in national fights, including over Joe Biden’s policies that limit oil and gas production and Covid vaccine mandates.
Prior to his political career, Landry served 11 years in the Louisiana Army National Guard, was a local police officer, sheriff’s deputy and attorney.
Along the campaign trail, Landry faced political attacks from opponents on social media and in interviews, calling him a bully and making accusations of backroom deals to gain support.
The original article contains 456 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News