191
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.::The British Museum is digitizing its entire collection of more than eight million pieces, at a total cost of over $12 million. This move was announced after the museum experienced a theft back in August.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 62 points 1 year ago

Only 12 million? Sounds like a steal. The British museum has everything. That's really good

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Only 12 million? Sounds like a steal

I mean that's like 12 million more than they paid for it...

It is the British museum after all

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Now THAT was a steal

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Very witty and original joke

[-] nezbyte@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

If anyone wants more detail. The 2021/2022 capital expenditures for the British Museum totaled just over £25M. The digitization will take at least 5 years. So at worst a 10% increase per year in capital expenditures for them.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1093002/E02763183_HC_438_British_Museum_ARA_2022_WEB.pdf

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

No kidding. It seems reckless that they haven't done it yet.

[-] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

The thefts weren't recent, they started stealing that collection decades ago.

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Higgs is suspected to have taken uncategorized items and selling them on the e-commerce website eBay. One item worth $64,000 was offered for online auction for as little as $51 and listings for artifacts from the museum’s collection appeared online as early as 2016, according to a report in the Telegraph.

[-] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The stealing I meant was the British Museum's acquisition of the collection, but this too.

[-] ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

With all my respects if you repatriate them here in Mexico they will end up in some gangsters villa. The ministry of culture is weaker than their coked up limp dicks.

[-] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh well that's a drag :(

[-] DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Lol that was my first thought when I read this too. Nonetheless, there's zero chance of any of the historical artifacts being repatriated to their countries of origin now. It's a big loss.

[-] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

So the museum famous for stealing its artifacts is complaining about said stuff being stolen from them?

[-] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Why is the cost a problem. 12 mill might be a lot of money for like, some guy, but the government is responsible for the artifacts and deal with national budgets in the trillions.

If they dont want to pay for security storage and backups, send the peices back to their countries of origin. Maybe they can find some way of protecting history, cause England sure doesn't want the responsibility

[-] db2@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 year ago

After they've scanned it all will they be returning it to the countries they stole them from?

[-] cave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Of course not. People can't be trusted to take care of their own historical artifacts. Britain will take better care of them. If they want to see it, they can just pay to fly across the world to see them. It's surely better this way.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's not currently up to the British Museum; it's up to Parliament. Repatriating artifacts is currently illegal under UK law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Museum_Act_1963

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We can’t do it because it’s against the law that we made that says it’s illegal.

[-] db2@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] PeachMan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Sure, but I don't see any of the leadership at the museum advocating against that law.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] PeachMan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could write them a letter and ask, I suppose?

It's dishonest to say "I don't see X" when you haven't made any effort to look for X.

[-] Orionza@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

$12 million - a bargain for digitizing the collection for eternity.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Why the fuck is anyone writing an article about $12M dollars?

Do people not understand what rich people make from passive investments? Literally just repurpose a single rich person's passive investment and you can pay to digitize a library's worth of artifacts every year for eternity.

Society is absolutely fucked in the head if anyone is allowed to build a yacht without getting crowbarred in the back of the calf while we're considering whether or not "we can afford to pay" to preserve priceless historical artifacts.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Thieves all the way down.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cost of securing your intangibly and financially valuable physical assets for all time and ease of "sharing" losslessly with other museums?

Priceless.

[-] moipe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

A virtual version of the museum in 2029? What would be the point in going? I can look at a picture of a picture on the internet for free.

[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I get what you mean, like there's definitely some stuff you can just look at a picture of it on the internet, but I guess for others it's about the sense of space, connection, grouping, narrative, context etc that's present with a well put together Museum or Gallery display.

Without all that, you've just got a car boot sale of random things - wheras the text, maps, illustrations, audio, video or 3d recreations etc that sits alongside - or simply the placement of things next to one another, or following through the room in a particular order is what really makes that stuff interesting.

[-] caboose2006@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

It only took a couple hundred years for them to respond to all the theft they did? Better late than never I guess.

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

What does it cost? How much of their collection?

I just read it 3 times in the feed, first post title, then preview of link, then op comment :D

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
191 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2938 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS