this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
2662 points (99.7% liked)

Fediverse

31826 readers
673 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's brief, around 25:15

https://youtube.com/watch?v=nf7XHR3EVHo


If you've been sitting on making a post about your favorite instance, this could be a good opportunity to do so.

Going by our registration applications, a lot of people are learning about the fediverse for the first time and they're excited about the idea. I've really enjoyed reading through them :)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 296 points 3 weeks ago (19 children)

I wish he had mentioned Lemmy, but it's understandable that he didn't. Also Bluesky isn't an alternative to big tech, it IS big tech. I wish it wasn't stealing so much of our publicity lately.

But beggars can't be choosers, and we have seen some nice growth over the past couple months. John Oliver fans are the perfect candidates to join the fediverse, hopefully some of them find their way to Lemmy.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 80 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm really not happy about bluesky their fragmentation of the fediverse protocols is only going to harm us in the long run.

[–] knova@infosec.pub 35 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

I’m really not happy about bluesky their fragmentation of the fediverse protocols

shrug, I wish they were with us, but they are also a big ole corporate entity, so I'm kind ok with us staying our our side of the fence. As they need to implement payment and corporate protections to their network, we're free to be free over here.

is only going to harm us in the long run.

We don't have to play ball. not with them anyway,

I think, If we have any credible threat, it's going to be from the Governmental gross anti-tampering laws, forced moderation, or backup regulations. They could make it legally difficulty for us to exist.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anachronology@fedia.io 46 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Agreed, but at least Bluesky is a public benefit corporation, so it supposed to take in the needs of society as well as profit in its decision-making. That may not be much, but it's a start.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 42 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

I'm not familiar with the details of that, but it seems like more of a red herring to me. A form of controlled opposition to divert people away from truly revolutionary platforms.

Of course it has to seem like a plausible alternative, but is it actually decentralized or altruistic enough to make a meaningful difference? I think not.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Public benefit corporation" is such an oxymoron, I know it's cliché to say this but it reads like something out of 1984.

If your goal is truly to benefit the public, why wouldn't you start a non-profit? It's because they want profits, which will always be at odds with the interests of the public.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 39 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Also Bluesky isn't an alternative to big tech, it IS big tech. I wish it wasn't stealing so much of our publicity lately.

This; I'm so sick of hearing it pop up when people mention alternatives.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not sure anyone mentions bluesky as an alternative to big tech.

Pretty sure they only mention it as an alternative to musk/X.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

This right here, the everyday person doesn't know what federation is let alone believes that it's an alternative to federated platforms. They see it as a better Twitter that's not run by Musk and honestly that's all they need to know.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 39 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

John Oliver fans are the perfect candidates to join the fediverse, hopefully some of them find their way to Lemmy.

Too late - we are already here!:-P

img

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 weeks ago

Indirectly, looking up "John Oliver Mastodon" brings up this post in the top few. "John Oliver Pixelfed" has this post as the first option

So we're not completely left out :)

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 28 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Exactly, don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Someone using BlueSky over Twitter is a good thing.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] lowleveldata@lemmy.world 152 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 98 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 97 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (12 children)

Yeah I think it's best we don't advertise this place. It's a little strange.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 145 points 3 weeks ago (28 children)

Come to Lemmy, we got: blood thirsty Linux users, furries, femboys, communists, and tankies. Also, porn.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

The porn is sadly lacking, actuallly.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] guiguinofake@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't forget the Trekkies.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 63 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Does that ~~Late Show~~ Last Week Tonight with John Oliver have a presence in the Fediverse?

[–] astro_ray@piefed.social 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Someone on mastodon told me, if you haven't found someone on fedi, you are probably not looking hard enough. But no, I don't think they are on fedi

[–] CMLVI@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

Someone is wrong lol. NFL, for example, cannot do anything outside of Twitter at this time. They are apparently working on it, but it's gotta be implemented league-wide, so it's taking some time. Idk if they're even trying to get onto Mastodon, last I heard it was just Bluesky.

This is a large org with hundreds of millions of fans, with no presence on Fediverse really. I'm sure there are mirror accounts, but none are official.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] legolas@fedit.pl 62 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

It's crazy how the wind changed. Does anyone remeber the almost exact same thing 4 years ago, when people on the right side of political spectrum shared alternatives to big tech from their point ov view? GAB.COM, PARLER, BRAVE, DUCKDUCKGO etc

XD

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Duckduckgo? That's just a search engine, no?

I agree on the rest of the parts tho

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Yeah, odd inclusion. Duckduckgo is indeed a search enginge, but it's essentially just a front end for Bing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

DDG and Brave were pushed as "censorship free" alternatives, back when I was looking into covid disinformation, because the very obviously fake websites would sometimes rank higher on them

There may be more to it though

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 55 points 3 weeks ago

This is fantastic to see.

[–] Uri@infosec.pub 51 points 3 weeks ago (19 children)

Bluesky will be the next Twitter. Just give it some time

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 45 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I say give it three years and blue sky will just be a neolib twitter

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (15 children)

Not friendica, which seems an obvious facebook alternative.

Also, I think they're onto something with their fuck it approach that every social media platform would benefit from. The internet was mostly that before. Content moderation primarily serves advertisers, it was never really for the people. Old internet anarchy was chaotic fun.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 34 points 3 weeks ago

One of the few decent TV hosts. His reporting on Palestine breaks with the anti-Palestinian censorship that dominates US media.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I’m sure he’s going to be facing lawsuits from Краснов and Wormtongue any day now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 24 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›