I admire his optimism, even if I don't share it.
Trump is not to be trusted. Trump is a liar and a thief. I have never seen him to be anything else.
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
124 points (97.7% liked)
News
27517 readers
4265 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Keep in mind he's also making sure to publicly put the ball in Trump's court regarding maintaining the relationship - especially obvious with his remark about "well of course they wouldn't want to side with Russia". Expressing optimism and openness publicly while maybe have reservations privately strikes me as a shrewd political stance.
It's very, very unlikely that he is actually optimistic. Global leaders say things because of diplomatic reasons. That doesn't always reflect their actual opinions.
Well for what it's worth, he said salvage it with the USA, regardless of who he has to do it with. Call me crazy but for what it's worth of Russia ever gets a non insane leader, I'd love for at least some of the trading relations to reestablish instead of us hating the country for the next 200 years
Ugh, I can't stand the thought of them signing this deal! I get so frustrated every time he entertains it. I don't want to see them get screwed over while the US still benefits.
The only thing potentially positive is if signing actually gets real help sent there, and the US somehow gets sane people back in power that will repeal the deal or at least amend it more favorably because it was made through coercion.
The lack of a promise to actually send military aid though, plus the profiteering that usually happens when the US "helps" someone makes me really want Europe and friends to come through before he makes a deal with the US.
Zelensky should just promise Trump all profits from any mineral extraction done in Crimea or other occupied territories once reclaimed.
Ukraine loses nothing if the territory is not reclaimed, and the US gains nothing if the territory is not reclaimed.
I don't know. It feels Trump is looking to profit off of that territory either way. I imagine the bigger prize is if Zelensky gives in, but even if Russia breaks him off just a slice of Crimean profits or some of his favorite beach front real estate to develop, I'm sure that'd be enough for him to screw over Ukraine.
I feel he'd definitely rather stay on Putin's good side than Zelensky's also. There's a reason Putin is getting so much more of his time, and it shows which party he values more.
Almost the full 4 years of Trump are left, even though it feels like we're so much further into it and that's a lot of time for him to cause trouble or steal from Ukraine.
Trump supports Putin and sees him as something resembling an equal. He doesn't have that same respect for Zelenskyy. He sees Ukraine as the little guy, and being a bully, he tries to push them around to get what he wants from them. And anything Zelenskyy does to resist that bullying becomes an attack on Trump's ego, which is a bigger deal to him than any war or geopolitical issue.
I mean, for fuck sake, Trump was yelling at Zelenskyy for supposedly risking millions of lives and world war 3 by not shutting up about security guarantees and just taking whatever deal they give him. But even with those stakes, he's ready to end the entire process and cancel the deal over being "disrespected" and not getting thanked enough. Even if we take Trump's statements at face value and assume he is being honest and operating in good faith, he's still giant piece of shit that cares less about the lives of millions and the fate of the world than his own ego.
There may be a way to steer Trump into pushing back against Putin and supporting Ukraine a little bit. Maybe if someone could get actually get through to him and make him understand how everyone is laughing at him for being Putin’s bitch. Unfortunately, that would have to get past a nearly impenetrable wall of idiocy and self-delusion that keeps him safe from reality.
I agree with the last part. Putin must have something he really wants though, as I haven't really heard anyone say he looks tough or even on equal footing to Putin in any of their dealings. That's what I don't get about the whole thing. I feel the Russian state has been exposed as a paper tiger and why he doesn't look like the guy to beat the big bad after 80 years or whatever it's been is beyond me. He could be an actual champion, but it doesn't seem to be what he's after.
I'll be looking forward to the next AI generated video of Trump "taking over" Crimea, this time featuring a sunbathing Putin.
Lol I look forward to the burly and bearded Cossack women squat dancing with 2 left feet and shirtless Trump riding horses with Putin.
It's not unreasonable for countries to ask for some small guarantees on trade if they prop ukraine up, especially when it's do or die and it's their help that allows a chance.
Nothing is free etc etc
Yes, but do you trust this administration to give a fair deal to Ukraine without exploitation? Turning Ukraine into another Haiti isn't a great deal.
Also at the same time he's promising Ukraine the deal of a lifetime, he's making threats and economically bullying all America's other allies while still trying to be buddies with Putin, Orban, and a bunch of other racists, authoritarians, and plutocrats. None of that screams trustworthy to me.
No, of course I don't. Trump is dogshit.
I'm more and more convinced the Trump administration is not negotiating in good faith. I don't believe the minerals thing was anything other than something Trump thought Zelenskyy would never be able to say 'yes' to. Trump doesn't want to support Ukraine, but he also needs to find enough of an excuse to save some semblance of face. So when Zelenskyy indicated the minerals deal could be done, with modifications, Trump/Vance cooked up that cowardly shitshow to try and paint Zelenskyy as unreasonable in order to give them enough of an excuse to walk away.
I understand why Zelenskyy is desperate for US support but I'm pretty much certain at this point it won;t be forthcoming. Even if Starmer/Macron et al persuade the two of them to re-meet it'll just be something else next time.
The US, as a political force supporting stability and peace is no more. Its time the rest of the world accepted that and moved on because its not outside the realm of possibility that a US/Russian political/military alliance might exist relatively soon and we might need to be ready for that.
We supplied less than 100 billion in aid and he asked for 500 billion in return. Their countries GDP is less than half of that. There was no way it was ever in good faith. So during more than 2 years of war, the U.S. spent the equivalent of 4% of it's defense budget helping defend Europe against an invasion. What is the point of spending so much on our military if it isn't to have the soft power created by it. If we aren't going to defend other countries, we should be demanding an 80% reduction in military spending. That would make it so we could fill social securities pockets easily. He's going to give all foreign influence/respect up anyways, why not do it immediately and actually start clearing debt.
