133

But there's still no guarantee the GOP's next pick for speaker will be able to secure the needed 217 votes on the House floor, as some lawmakers aren't signing a "unity" pledge.

Three weeks after Kevin McCarthy’s ouster, House Republicans will gather behind closed doors Tuesday morning to nominate a new candidate for speaker — their third attempt to fill the job.

A GOP civil war has prevented Republicans from agreeing on a successor to McCarthy, R-Calif. The GOP’s two previous picks bowed out after they failed to secure the votes needed to win on the floor, leaving the House in a state of unprecedented chaos with a possible government shutdown less than a month away and wars raging in Ukraine and the Middle East.

“The world is burning around us, and American leadership is necessary. And you can’t have the full complement of American leadership if the House of Representatives is not functioning,” Rep. Steve Womack, R-Ark., said on NBC’s “Meet the Press NOW," emphasizing the need for his colleagues to move on and coalesce around a new leader.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Juujian@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

"In each round Tuesday, the lowest vote-getter will be eliminated until a single candidate secures a simple majority of those in the room."

Ranked choice, how progressive ?!

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

The highest vote getter will be Jeffries. Oh wait, they’re ignoring half the chamber.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

If there's anything I know about American Fascists, it's that if they promise not to vote for someone who's not been nominated, and promise not to vote for someone who's been eliminated, they are lying.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

I love that they keep doing this behind closed doors so we don't see them trying to kick each other's asses.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

This is the way it's always worked. The difference is that usually, the closed-door vote is a mundane formality before bringing the vote to the floor, and there's no soap-opera drama happening in the room that anyone would care about, so we usually hear little to nothing about it.

This time it's just slightly different. Can't exactly put my finger on how though................... ;)

[-] spark947@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Just admit defeat and vote for Jeffries. Losers.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Republicans that reach across the isle and vote for a democrat JUST to keep the country going will be looked back on as heroes.

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago

They will be villainized and dog walked out of congress like Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A person can dream I guess

[-] SPOOSER@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

Only problem is they'll be replaced by someone far worse.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Republicans that reach across the isle and vote for a democrat JUST to keep the country going will be looked back on as heroes.

Sadly, this is not the case. Every Republican who has even attempted to glance across the aisle either quit, "retired", or was primaried. As much as we'd like to believe that there are only a few GOPers who are truly at the extremes, the overwhelming majority of their voting base wants it this way. Why do you think so many people have denounced Trump, only to come back begging for forgiveness in record time?

[-] spark947@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

There has got to be 5 Republicans ready to throw in the towel. Screw the maga crowd, they can go to hell.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because they see who is pulling the orange sandwich’s strings and want to suckle at the same teat. They value money over human life. I just like to hope there just half a dozen left that have some shred of humanity left in them. A pipe dream I know…

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If there were, we wouldn't be in this situation.

[-] Granite@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

But they will be eaten alive now, so they won’t

[-] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

That's either a small island, or Republicans have long-ass arms.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

They'd need an independent or third party, or they'd be villainized.

[-] SaintWacko@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

"The world is burning around us, and we need to make sure that continues"

[-] Treczoks@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

US politics is delivering so many opportunities for eating popcorn. "The Speaker Show: Who Will Fail Today", "Trump vs. the Law - Showdown in Court".

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

US politics is the best reality television you can watch.

[-] Treczoks@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

With one downside: The prime time is (for us here) in the middle of the night.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"Hey, you there! Boy, what speaker vote are we on now?"

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

3rd time this month. I think we're over 20 speaker votes for the year.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Lol unity pledge?! These people are the looney toons of politics

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Apparently, signing a pledge is required to help guarantee they won't fuck each other.

Narrator: They will fuck each other.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Narrator: They will fuck each other.

This is a blatantly false statement.

  • Matt Gaetz will not fuck any of them because they're all above the age of 18.
  • Lauren Boebert only lets them get to second base, but insists that it happens in public.
  • Jim Jordan only watches people fuck college wrestlers.
  • Marjorie Taylor Greene does not fuck outside her species.
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

This is a blatantly false statement.

I was lifting my pitchfork before I read the rest of your comment. Well played.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Aaaannnd he's gone.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, no one is going to follow these silly rules.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I bet they could get one elected if it was a combined vote for speaker and lower taxes on corporations, capital gains, and the wealthiest levels of income

[-] autotldr 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — Three weeks after Kevin McCarthy’s ouster, House Republicans will gather behind closed doors Tuesday morning to nominate a new candidate for speaker — their third attempt to fill the job.

The GOP’s two previous picks bowed out after they failed to secure the votes needed to win on the floor, leaving the House in a state of unprecedented chaos with a possible government shutdown less than a month away and wars raging in Ukraine and the Middle East.

And you can’t have the full complement of American leadership if the House of Representatives is not functioning,” Rep. Steve Womack, R-Ark., said on NBC’s “Meet the Press NOW," emphasizing the need for his colleagues to move on and coalesce around a new leader.

The party's two previous nominees — Majority Leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan of Ohio — came nowhere close to that magic number and were forced to drop out.

Some lawmakers, including Reps. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., and Chip Roy, R-Texas, told reporters Monday as colleagues were meeting that they would not sign a "unity" pledge to support the speaker-designate before they knew who it was.

; Republican Study Committee Chairman Kevin Hern of Oklahoma, who previously owned McDonald's franchises and sent burgers to colleagues Monday; former Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions of Texas; Jack Bergman of Michigan, a retired Marine Corps lieutenant general; Byron Donalds of Florida, a member of the far-right Freedom Caucus; and Austin Scott of Georgia, who challenged Jordan for speaker last week.


The original article contains 862 words, the summary contains 255 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
133 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3462 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS