I'd argue that Kyle_Bartley's is actually one of the best Wikipedia images I've seen
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
147 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
38322 readers
484 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Lol EXCELLENT example of the kind of photo Wikiportraits is trying to replace. It's hilarious, but not great for the internet's most reliable resource.
This must never be changed
You don't have to add an underscore for the hyper link to work by the way
This is really cool. I love how things like Wikipedia just show how weirdly f'd up our whole society is by doing something without extracting maximum compensation and breaking systems.
Wikipedia does such a solid, unmitigated GOOD service for the world, especially the English speaking world.
Darwin almighty if a celeb wants their photo changed on Wikipedia all they have to do is submit a decent photo they’ve taken themselves.
The bad photos are just because of the wiki license requirements, it's why there are a lot of military photos on Wikipedia because they're all public domain by default.
They'd run afoul of the whole "editing your own article" restrictions.
While they probably shouldn't actually put it on the article themselves, they can submit it to Wikimedia Commons or even just post it somewhere public under a creative commons licence
They don’t need to edit the article, just submit a decent photo to wikimedia. The editing can be done by others as soon as the portrait has been uploaded.
As did Brian David Gilbert:
and none of those are the ones currently used on his article lol
honestly you aren't wrong. I'd guess it's just a case of the Wikipedia photo being a bottom priority for them, but then you would think "update Wikipedia photo" would be somewhere on every publicist's to-do list. Maybe this project will encourage more publicists to explore how to do this.
Finally, we're starting to tackle the real problems
No no, leave them that way.
Yeah I kinda like the tradition of terrible photographs on Wikipedia tbh
Wikipedia editor NeedsGlasses made a good point in the discussion on Jeremy Strongs page about why we should keep the "bad" photos
[...] As a wikipedia editor i think it's important to remember that in some way wikipedia represents the viewpoint of the common man. It is not a direct participant at events but a mere spectator. [...]
I think that is a little backwards thinking. Common folk are at these events taking the pictures. Common folk are producing high quality content. I'm pretty sure the celebrities themselves wouldn't have as much information on their peers as the collective of researchers do. Far from mere spectators.
Sometimes they are really really bad, but then other times, it's the only picture I see of the person that hasn't been doctored and airbrushed to hell and back.
Given how outdated and poorly sourced most of wikipedia is it’s kind of ironic we’re focusing on celebrity portraits
Wikipedia focuses on those other issues as well, they just happen to be a group of volunteers trying to manage the most comprehensive repository of information that the world has ever seen. If you see issues with articles, you are always welcome to sign up and edit the articles yourself!
I know we do. I’ve got thousands of wikipedia edits.
And it often isn’t as easy as just editing unfortunately. A lot of pages have overprotective people watching the changelog trying to shelter their pet theories/biases.
seems strange for you to criticize the quality of Wikipedia, then? you have personal experience that demonstrates why these volunteers are putting their time towards this instead of towards editing articles - editing articles is a difficult and sometimes contentious process.
I had no idea that this problem existed, but I guess it makes sense