this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
154 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6180 readers
517 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 211@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Wait, over 60% met them or faced consequences?

Edit: "Almost 61% achieved their targets" holy fuck. Corporations did something good they said they would, over half the time.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do those targets involve carbon credits and other greenwashing measures that allow them to evade climate goals and are essentially state-sanctioned fraud?

I don't need to check, because I know they do.

[–] 211@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

True. I'm still shocked. This should be taken more as low estimate of corporations than admiration of their accomplishments. You know those goals were set as low as they could be, with as many tricks as there could be, and still I expected something like maybe 20% to stick to them at best.

[–] Beastimus@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, that's certainly one way you could phrase it, but given who the droppers were, this result pretty much checks out.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, there's going to be consequences, their kids just aren't facing them yet. You can cheat the stock market, you can even cheat the IRS, but you can't cheat physics.

[–] grandel@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

The consequence is that CEOs will retire with a heap of money and die in luxury.

I dont think they care for anything than themselves, including any potential children.