this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
140 points (97.9% liked)

Science

3937 readers
162 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

„It is scientifically proven that you’re so salty because I’m getting some” is a line that you’re now allowed to use.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

As someone who isn't getting any, but isn't actually salty about it (because effort), thinks pro-life is a universally stupid movement, and still doesn't understand why the fuck it matters who does and doesnt have casual sex

It's 100% because they ain't getting any and they jelly

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 58 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I agree that we should discourage casual sex.

We should only encouraged ranked competitive sex, otherwise you end up matched with people outside your MMR.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 week ago

Without casual sex how do you think people arw going to find they can compete in competitive sex? Casual sexers go to amateur leagues and get recruited for competitive and professional leagues.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Although at what rank do you actively have to meet it up? B, A, S?

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I meant the ranking, not certain body parts hahaha.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

OK but sometimes I want to have a lazy fuck and don't want to have to smurf

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's more like men can have all the sex they want, women can only have sex to create more babies.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But no gay sex though, that's strictly not allowed.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unless it's with two women, because that's totally hot.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Bur only if they're conventionally attractive and open to men fetishizing them

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

Have we considered that maybe they just want a ranked competitive sex league?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A study was needed for this?

yes, to make clarity

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So tuxedos and ball gowns are required now?

ETA: The more I think about this, I’m down with having a sex tiara.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 17 hours ago

no funny business until i put on the sex hat

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah that's obvious by talking to them