this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
140 points (97.9% liked)

Science

4132 readers
110 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 63 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

„It is scientifically proven that you’re so salty because I’m getting some” is a line that you’re now allowed to use.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 10 points 3 weeks ago

As someone who isn't getting any, but isn't actually salty about it (because effort), thinks pro-life is a universally stupid movement, and still doesn't understand why the fuck it matters who does and doesnt have casual sex

It's 100% because they ain't getting any and they jelly

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 58 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I agree that we should discourage casual sex.

We should only encouraged ranked competitive sex, otherwise you end up matched with people outside your MMR.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 3 weeks ago

Without casual sex how do you think people arw going to find they can compete in competitive sex? Casual sexers go to amateur leagues and get recruited for competitive and professional leagues.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Although at what rank do you actively have to meet it up? B, A, S?

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I meant the ranking, not certain body parts hahaha.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

OK but sometimes I want to have a lazy fuck and don't want to have to smurf

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's more like men can have all the sex they want, women can only have sex to create more babies.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But no gay sex though, that's strictly not allowed.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Unless it's with two women, because that's totally hot.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Bur only if they're conventionally attractive and open to men fetishizing them

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago

Have we considered that maybe they just want a ranked competitive sex league?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A study was needed for this?

yes, to make clarity

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So tuxedos and ball gowns are required now?

ETA: The more I think about this, I’m down with having a sex tiara.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

no funny business until i put on the sex hat

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah that's obvious by talking to them