this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
250 points (98.8% liked)

politics

22011 readers
4508 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare rebuke after Trump called for impeaching judges who ruled against him.

Roberts defended judicial independence, but critics argue his court’s rulings have shielded Trump from accountability, enabling his authoritarian tendencies.

Trump ignored a federal court order blocking migrant deportations, prompting legal scrutiny. Judges facing threats highlight growing concerns over the judiciary’s role in checking executive power.

With a conservative Supreme Court majority, questions remain over whether Roberts will continue enabling Trump’s power or push back against further erosion of judicial authority.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck did he think was going to happen when he enabled a dictator?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 7 points 15 hours ago

He thought FedSoc judges would be running the show. He never imagined Elon would Leeroy Jenkins his way into control of the federal government

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 110 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Roberts is a fucking traitor that opened the floodgates for this shit, and now he has buyers remorse?!? That's what happens when you buy a Tesla. This? This isn't buyers remorse.

I hope he dies of measles.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 26 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't call it buyer's remorse.

Let me share a hot take based on my experience of living in the US, Ukraine and Russia (and closely following politics).

There are two factors that are likely driving Roberts' behaviour:

  1. They need an alibi. They need something that can differentiate them from the current oligarch regime in the US. While the US is a pretty conformist country (not saying the most conformist there is, but far more conformist than the popularity of recital of freedom polemics would suggest), you always have the possibility of black swan type events. One example would be Trump and his close associates being taken down in a forceful and public manner. The judicial wing of the oligarchic regime wants a failsafe, something that would allow them to say "we are not oligarch shills, we were just following a conservative judicial philosophy, it is not our fault that it was exploited by bad actors!" They are smart enough to know that if black swan type events do happen, they often take a life of their own and all bets are off. They want an exit strategy.
  2. Judicial independence. I don't mean this in the American sense of the term. I am talking about different power centres within an oligarchic regime. Let's take russia for example. Even though it's a highly centralized regime, it still has different power centres. The russian central bank has a modicum of independence. Different cliques in the power structures (and there are many cliques) have their own agenda and capabilities. Regional warlords (Kadyrov being the most well know, but he is not the only one) do have some manner of leverage in the system. The oligarchs, while being banned from politics, do have freedom in how they run their businesses. The one notable example without any leverage is the russian judicial system. They are little more than rubber stamp goons with no independent power. Roberts does not want to turn into Judge Ivan of Govnogorsk. He needs to show the other power centres in America's oligarch regime that cooperation has a price and that other thugs need to show him respect.
[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The more I observe American politics the more I realize all three countries you mention have more in common than many want to acknowledge.

Especially the taboos about speaking of certain political truths. Americans are more Russian than most other countries

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Or it may be that we in the West are not exceptional, Russians are also just people, and it can happen to any country that is not willing to resist it.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

Yes and no? Both are large areas of land of scattered and mixed populations held together by political strangeness that is surprisingly robust.

Both seem easy to understand , however in closer inspection are misunderstood by most, even by their own citizens.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I hope he dies of ~~measles~~ untreated rabies.

Go big or go home.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

Let's add syphilis to that cocktail.

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yes but not until someone sane is in the white house. He will need to be replaced.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Will there will be a sane replacement, or a White House, later?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago

There will be a whites-only house… does that count?

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 12 points 17 hours ago

What's the line, It didn't matter till they came for me?

[–] thefrozenorth@sh.itjust.works 15 points 18 hours ago

No he doesn't. That was the plan all along. Once Trump is king, he will remove the separation of church and state and Avada Kedavra you have an Evangelical theocracy. And with control of the military, he can do anything he wants.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 20 hours ago

Is that a leopard on your face, your honor? Hur dur har har!!!

(as fascists put a bag over my head and drive me away in a van...)

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 20 hours ago

Who could have guessed??! If only there were some way to know that being a spineless collaborator would come back to bite you and everyone else in the ass!

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 21 hours ago

So the court can reverse itself. Do it.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans are all about theatrics and gotcha moments. I feel this is another of those. Remember the McConnell/Trump rivalry? Political Theater. Remember Bush (W. Bush)/Trump rivalry? Political Theater. This is going to be one of them.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

And the most disgusting and blatant display of it is Trump/Vance vs Zelinsky. Not just political theater but political 2nd graders doing Death of a Salesman.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Fuck him and the rest of the Republican SC.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 21 hours ago

What is it with these idiots that they think "yeah but you weren't supposed to attack me and my friends with that unlimited power I gave you!" right after giving unlimited power to a narcissistic psychopathic liar who will sell his own mother if it would benefit him...?

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Fuck that rancid traitor

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Nah, this is just a show so he can later claim in his memoirs that he resisted as best he could. He'll do as he's told.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

“Wait… he’s a leopard? I thought he was a cheetah!”