639
Continuing in personally attacking Engoron, he raged, "He’s an out of control 'Nut Job,' who fined me $10,000 over a ridiculous Gag Order
Maybe instead of a fine, it'll any amount of jail time instead.
Violations of gag orders and contempt always feel infuriatingly "gradual" because usually people just STFU after the first one. Trump (as we all know) doesn't have the self control normal asshole defendants have. Give it another gag violation and this moron is gonna spend the night in jail, then we all get to see him without his daily hair routine. That shit scares him more than anything.
Once Chutkan's gag goes back into effect, he'll be in jail quickly unless Kise or Lauro actually manage to get through his thick skull with an air hammer.
E: Also getting the idea that Engoron is patient enough not to expand the gag order (yet, anyway) because he knows he's already effectively ended the Trump organization. Trump's business "empire" is basically a dead man walking already.
What about the direct grifting he's doing? Someone needs to find a way to seize those assets and end that supply of money.
I feel bad for the victims but as PT Barnum said there's a sucker born every minute. Trump is tapped into a large number of suckers.
load more comments
(1 replies)
A short stay in jail won't break Donnie. It will energize his followers, and we'll have to hear them comparing him to Mandela and MLK for the next century.
I think the mugshots without his hair and makeup will go a long way in deflating not only his ego, but also the cult of personality built on his ego.
All his followers look in the mirror every morning. He is their ego projected. They will feel rage vicariously as if they were the ones being robbed of their dignity and dig in further.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Lol, they would, too! And then, like King's and Mandela's followers, they'd ~~peacefully march with signs saying 'Free my president, Li'l Donny!~~ probably start shooting people in vengeance because it's clearly the end of times and Joe Biden is the anti-Christ apparent.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(15 replies)
He also called James a racist again so I see a $25k fine coming Monday
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(20 replies)
I hate even reading the deranged stupid shit that he has to say. So glad we don't have to hear it every day anymore.
I left it to better people than I to do the work of reading and listening to him.
A grateful nation thanks them for their service and sacrifice 🫡🙏🇺🇸
load more comments
(2 replies)
I want him to blow his top like a cartoon where his face gets red, steam comes out of his ears, and the toupee flies a foot straight up into the air
lul
That seems weirdly concise for him (to have typed). I wonder if he's got some publicist taking dictation.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Alright Ivanka. This... THIS is your time to fucking shine.
Step up, be brutally honest. Sell that fucker out. Make a few clever remarks about him being a person who's too stupid to zip tie themselves and apologize for ever being near him.
Save yourself. Go full scorched earth on his ass.
She won't. She's almost as corrupt as her father. Don't forget, it's her husband Jared Kushner who accepted a 2 billion dollar investment from MBS.
Also, if she testifies truthfully, she'll be admitting to her own crimes, and to other things that will cost her real money. For example, one of the things she's going to testify about in this trial is how her father gave her several properties, but the properties were appraised using Donald's ridiculous appraisal logic, so that she would pay less in taxes. If she is honest, the IRS will be after her immediately.
By the way, there's a chance that she could have gotten out of this without testifying in open court, but her lawyers amateurishly missed doing anything by the deadline. And if you remember, Trump wanted a jury trial for this case, but his lawyer forgot to ask for one, so they got a bench trial, instead.
This kind of shit would be absolutely hilarious if there wasn't some chance that he'd become President again. This guy thinks he surrounds himself with "the best people", but all he can find are people who make elementary mistakes.
And the US President's biggest influence on the country is through his appointees. He actually has a few decent lawyers working for him now, but when the chips are down, he relies on these types of people, probably because they kissed his ass more, or swore allegiance to him or something.
I mean, they didn't forget to ask, they straight up filled out the form saying, "bench trial, please".
I have seen the form (but I think not the actual filled out forms for this case), and my memory is that it has a check box to request "jury trial", and a check box to request "bench trial".
As I recall, on the DA's form, they checked the box for "bench trial", while on defendant Trump's form, they didn't check any box at all, which is also technically a valid way to fill out the form, but if a defendant does that, they will usually get a bench trial.
So, through incompetence, Trump's attorney's form was essentially asking for a bench trial, but it wasn't specifically filled out asking for a bench trial.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Ivanka doing all that? Have you seen her tweets and statements? She's all in for her father.
The most honest thing I think I've seen her say was in Born Rich:
I remember once my father and I were walking down Fifth Avenue and there was a homeless person sitting right outside of Trump Tower and I remember my father pointing to him and saying, ‘You know, that guy has $8 billion more than me,’ because he was in such extreme debt at that point, you know?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Lock him the fuck up.
Wow, it's almost like being a massive asshole makes people hate you. What are the odds?
also, being a flagrant criminal makes a judge impose restrictions and punishments while acting not too happy about your behavior. In fact, it's their job.
Do you think, in his entire long, miserable life.... He has EVER, and just a single time would count here, has he EVER accepted fault for anything? Has he ever said something like,
"This person has a point, I was wrong here"
Ever, even just once, for any reason, like "this person was ahead of me in line actually"...
No? He hasn't?
Well then how do you take ANYTHING he says seriously? Every other person you admire makes little mistakes Mr. tump voter, so genuinely, how can you take him seriously?
load more comments
(5 replies)
Does he have a current gag order that this is violating? Because that would just be super.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Aw, poor little d the failed game show host. Everyone is out to get him.
The GOP would never have Hunter testify in a trial against Joe right? Hello?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Is this guy legit going to have a heart attack live on stage whilst ranting spurious nonense?
This would be a great Xmas present to all of America.
The best present would be him dying of old age in prison. But yours is actually likely to happen.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Don't. Don't give us hope.
load more comments
(3 replies)
<sniff> <sniff> oohhh yeah, that's some fear i smell right there
I forget who the quote is about for "he's what a stupid man thinks a smart man looks like" was originally about, but for little d, I think "he's the incel's idea of a well-adjusted male" applies, as well as "he's what a person utterly ignorant of business thinks a successful businessman looks like".
Remember: this is the guy the unhinged right selected in order to "own the libs", because they think he's so masculine and so on. He's the biggest fucking snowflake there is.
How do you differentiate it from his regular anal leakage?
Does this violate the gag order? Oh please oh please oh please!
Why would it matter? No judge has a spine to throw the book at this guy. He gets a totally different court system than the rest of us.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Cadet Bonespur will be locked up soon.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
639 points (96.5% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3801 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS