Reading and comprehension are two different things. They have likely read the bible. If they believe in hell and quote Leviticus as though it represents Christian law then they have failed to comprend it.

God doesn't shit, but sometimes he does a poo poo.

I want so badly what they mean by woopsie. Like....if God is capable of an woopsie, then he is not infallible.

So....is he God or not?

It doesn't but Jesus does he's pretty clear he says

'be fuckin nice to people you shit heads"

i may be paraphrasing but that is what he's trying to get across

I don't remember it being prominent but there are a shitload of bizarre rules.

People seem to think religious people do things because their religion demands them. That is not how this works.

Their id demands it. Their ego demands it. Then in the cold light of morning. They had to do it. For God.

It also helps paint homosexuality as some perverted kink

"Wide Stance" is a reference to the long-time R senator from Idaho who was busted by a detective at the Minneapolis airport while apparently looking to have anonymous gay sex in a restroom. It seems the way guys would signal their interest to each other was by playing footsie between the stalls, and Craig's excuse was he is a 'wide guy' which somehow turned into 'wide stance'.

Also, check out the recipe he submitted to the Congress Cooks! cook book (which was really hilariously horrible, btw, it's gone now but used to be on a site called virtualcities):
https://dinnerisserved1972.com/2012/10/03/wiener-wednesday-super-tuber/

The Super Tuber. Most homoerotic entree I have ever imagined... you are supposed to take a potato, cut a hole through it, grease it up, then shove a hot dog through the middle.

No like "just asking for some tp" under a stall divider.

They’re testing the fences. This is how fascism creeps in mostly under the radar.

They say something egregious and gauge the response. If it gets too much backlash, they dial it back a bit, but each outrageous move normalises fascism a bit more until people are unknowingly accepting things that would have been unthinkable a few years before.

By the time people notice, discourse is so broken it’s nearly impossible to go back without seismic (and often deadly) social change.

They made the point to the people they wanted to (could it be one of their favorite accusations ....virtue signaling?) and then claim they removed it because they're being persecuted by WOKEys and the Bad Liberal Media.

Idiots with either opinion will flock to you to be contrarians.

Right next to the bushes that burn but are not consumed; aisle 35B, third shelf.