this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
247 points (99.2% liked)

Politics

668 readers
771 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28106135

Archive Link

An emergency order removes protections covering more than half the land managed by the U.S. Forest Service as the president aims to boost timber production.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Game recognize game

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 91 points 2 days ago (5 children)

No one will save the US, this administration is going to let everyone and everything be gutted.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

"let"? They are the ones gutting!

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A lot of JRPGs were pretty clear on the alightment and heroism of ecoterrorists.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I sometimes wonder about people who played final fantasy 7 but are conservative. Like, did you just blank out everything except tifa's tits and cool swords? They're ecoterrorists fighting against a corporation. Be like Barret.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Never underestimate how media illiterate right wingers are.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

1 very specific one that I can think of.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No one can save the US. This is what people voted for (including the protest non voters!), and that's how government is supposed to work: do what it was voted in for.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The dude cheated. Come on, there is no way around it. He legally cheated by gerrymandering and having his minions doing the cheating for him, but he cheated.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

By any sane reading of the constitution he should have been barred from running again due to having been part of an insurrection. But SCOTUS said nah let the voters decide.

[–] Fenrir 1 points 1 day ago

Gerrymandering has nothing to do with the President.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

I'm just awaiting the government investing all these "savings" and the money raised through tariffs into an obvious crypto scam, which then fails spectacularly and predictably and all the US taxpayer money conveniently disappears into the pockets of those running the scam (which totally won't involve Elon Musk).

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Just in case, a hole saw to put the exterior of the tree back over the place being staked, so its less obvious.

[–] wetsoggybread@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The wildest part is what necessitated making this an emergency order, what's the emergency? Corporations aren't making enough money?

Tarif imposed on Canada lumber because of fentanyl.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

'because of fentanyl' is a stretch. It's the given excuse not the actual reason.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Are they shipping the Fentanyl in the lumber?

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What a stupid fucking move. Here in Oregon there are so many logging scars and shitty areas that were once beautiful old growth forests. The destruction logging leaves in its wake is sobering, terrifying and disgusting. We already have areas that are fucked up, monoculture wastelands. Keep raping that until we get our shit together.

I can’t wait to read the big headline. Until then, they better fucking gridlock this in the courts.

Cunts. All of them. Maybe we could get them to go stand out in the woods holding some branches.

[–] bradd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm curious if it's going to be old growth though or land that was previously logged, replanted, and closed off. I assume it's the latter, since really I'm not sure old growth would even be as cost effective.

bend over america, hes goin in dry

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am the Lorax, I speak for the trees

Hands off my forests or I'll shoot your fucking knees.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Someone needs to fucking do it 9 months ago.

Wait...they missed. Fuck!

[–] blakenong 10 points 1 day ago

We stuffed and mounted the Lorax decades ago. Now our house is burning down and we dunno whyyy

[–] Bonus@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't know if threatening all our homelands is a great idea. I was raised by rangers, grew up scouting, lived in National Forests for a very formative chunk of my life. Sure, we all grew up in a bubble. We're not French. But, we're not going to just not resist. I keep picturing a mama bear defending her cubs, like in The Revenant. This is a vindictive order from the same guy that dodged serving in Vietnam, where he could have learned lessons about attacking people on their home turf in an unpopular war. The one saving grace is these lands are truly so magnificent and vast, most people will never be able to detect the intended atrocities. But I will. I'm supposed to be mountain biking in National Forests right now and am only delaying due to mechanical problems. All of us who actually restore these trails and spend time in these wildernesses will.

The damage to commercial interests is the thing he's really not calculating. Tourism, skiing, etc. will not be happy with this sabotage.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fucking conservatives online are touting this as a win, since "they [ephemeral] are already mismanaging the forests, and what sections are they logging, and it's not clear cutting, etc."

It's sick that they can't even state that this is bad.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ooh, RAPE the forest. I thought he said RAKE the forest.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

If only there was a sustainable source nearby…maybe even a longtime free trade partner…

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are sawmills and crews suddenly going to spring up to process all the new timber? Also, those trees aren't necessarily construction quality species.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Don't worry, China will buy it. Oh wait...

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Based on my googling, theres a severe labor shortage in logging. Hopefully we get the chance to overturn this before much damage is done. This EO and tariffs are unlikely to spur much investment if the possibility remains that they'll just get overturned in 3 years. IF we get another election.

[–] socialmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

They aren't his trees.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Which half? Bottom half?

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly all I can think is can America please die quietly. Your refusing to fight for yourself so why should we give a fuck

[–] don@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

I was under the assumption no cared about them.

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, what's the difference between logging in one make-believe-border geographic area vs another? Isn't it doing the same damage to this planet in the long run?

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

There are woodland species and grassland species. The grassland extends into the woodlands quite a bit. Even a small clearing in the middle of heavy woods makes a big dent in available woodland for species. Having large, unbroken areas of forest are essential for survival of the plants and animals that live there.

That's how a songbird researcher explained it to me.