this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
188 points (99.0% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

11239 readers
146 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For several years I've been using DuckDuckGo instead of Google Search, and I've been overall quite happy with the results. Only rarely had I to resort to Google search (!g).

During the last month or two, however, I've found myself using the !g switch and Google search more than half of the time. DuckDuckGo shows no or few results where Google shows more (and useful) ones.

Still I don't want to give in. So:

  • Have you also experienced this worsening of DuckDuckGo?
  • Which other more privacy-respecting alternatives do you recommend?
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wimster@europe.pub 11 points 1 day ago

I use Qwant instead and I'm pretty happy wiith that.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago

At some point, DuckDuckGo stop handling boolean logic properly in search terms. I've been using it for more than a decade, and the quality has definitely gotten worse over the last few years

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's only a handful of companies out there actually spidering. A lot of third party offerings are just re-scraping the existing spiders. I wouldn't be surprised if deficiencies in quality were cat and mouse games between google/bing/et all and DuckDuckGo.

I've been self-hosting SearXNG. It's fantastic for everything except local hits, business hours, stuff where Google maps data is being referenced.

I think the problem with free search is that somebody needs to pay for it. There's more people block both ads and anonymize themselves, the more free options will eventually wither.

And while I'm perfectly willing to pay for ad-free anonymity, capitalism dictates that all services need to have exponential growth or fail, and eventually all that data can just be sold or otherwise make it into the wrong hands.

I'm kind of hoping that at some point you can purchase distilled search content in a locally hostable AI model. It could post ad free and complete anonymous access, and you just need to pay for updates to the search model.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Right on. I'm running searxng and whoogle. Whoogle is a low resource option, and it only sources Google. I like searxng for the deep results, all kinds of weird stuff pops.

I was recently recommended to check out YaCy. Haven't done it yet.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been using SearXNG during the last day and I'm quite impressed too so far!

True what you say about the problems behind net search. It's actually a very complex problem. In my opinion part of the problem is that there's a lot (most?) of rubbish out there. It's like a library with useful books of different genres all mixed together, and mixed with an even larger amount of nonsense books. Maybe a solution would be something completely different from indexing – but I have no idea what.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago

It's an old problem. From the very start of the net, you had to sort the wheat from the chaff. Back then, the BS was human-generated. Now we have the addition of AI crap. But anyway, they solved it already. Its called wikipedia. (Or any other community curated data source as well.) I'm not some wiki fan, but that's the world's answer to encroaching bad data. An army of real, very corruptible, infighting, weird-as-hell wiki editors is our last stand against the BS.

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I switched to Kagi and am beyond satisfied. If your goal is to strictly degoogle, it fits the bill, but it still does if you are looking for better privacy, as it now comes with an implementation of Privacy Pass. The algorithm is leagues above Google's and DDGs, IMO, and the "lens" feature allows you to seamlessly filter the results to specialized sources, including the Fediverse. "Small web" is a fun feature for when you're bored running unit tests at work, too

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tried Kagi for a while, but it was giving me less useful results than DDG, so I simply left it. I think it depends a lot on what kinds of searches one does, and Kagi is more useful for other users.

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

AFAIK the algorithm for Kagi is really alien compared to Google and Bing/DDG, so the results do look a little weird at first, the main difference being just the sheer reduction in quantity of results.
But I guess if you didn't like it, you didn't. Maybe it is worse and I'm biased because I already paid

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Forgot to mention that it unfortunately is a US-owned company, so it would be off the table for the full-on US boycott crowd, especially because it's a paid service.
Though they seem to be a genuinely good company that consistenly provides good customer support and improves the product in tangible ways. Privacy Pass was implemented because of customer feedback, for example, and so were crypto payments, and both were publicly discussed on the forums with good transparency. They also actively promote the decentralization of the internet: with that Small Web feature I mentioned, with Fediverse and Usenet Archives search being implemented by default, by providing an interface to use any LLM model through their assistant... So I wouldn't want to boycott them, and I don't

[–] ZeroCool@lemmy.ca 59 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

I haven't noticed any issues with the quality of DDG results, but if you feel the results are lackluster, you could try a metasearch engine like SearXNG. You can self-host it or use one of the many public instances maintained by the community. The main advantage, apart from the privacy focused aspect of the project, is that you can pull results from multiple search engines with a single query. It's highly customizable too. You can configure it exactly how you want.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Trying it these past days and I'm impressed!

[–] scheep@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I like SearXNG, you get all of all worlds

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago
[–] fabio@lemmy.manganiello.tech 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can find a good Searxng instance or run your own (it can also run on a RPi)

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This.

I'm using perennialte.ch, they redirect reddit urls to redlib which is a nice touch.

I went ddg > kagi > searxng and this is the set up I'm happiest with.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Nice initiative besides the search service! Thanks for sharing.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For you, I would recommend the following:

I use SearXNG, which I self-host.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] guest@feddit.org 39 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I like qwant.com from France. They are using the Bing index but started to collaborate with Ecosia to build their own.

[–] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

+1, Qwant is awesome

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't used DDG in years. I've been using Start Page and its fit all my needs (its basically old google before enshitification).

I've played with searxng which seems promising but I haven't given it enough time. But it seems like I might eventually move there.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tried Startpage a while ago, but was put off but some alleged iffy dealings of the company behind it. Trying SearXNG now and I'm impressed!

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

What iffy dealings are you referring to? Because they were acquired? They've been established, and restablished after being acquired, as being completely privacy focused.

My only criticism is that they don't always play nice with VPNs.

But yes, SearXNG is a great way to go too.

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Maybe I search for weird things, but my major gripe with DDG is that its autocorrect is way too aggressive. But SearXNG public instances work for me 99% of the time.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I have been very happy with Kagi. I think that it is worth the money. I did quit it though, in line with the US boycott, so now i am on Quant.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BeyondRuby@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have thought the same thing after about three years or so of using DDG, I've been using Qwant as of late and seem to get much better results

Same, I was a DDG user for years and switched to Qwant a month ago. Qwant results are a step up from DDG, and Qwant takes the same approach to privacy as DDG but it's based in France so it wins in that regard as well. I'm in the US and Qwant still does a great job of providing localized results.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll give Qwant too a try, cheers! Testing SearXNG for a couple of days first.

[–] BeyondRuby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I wish you luck with SearXNG, I don't know if I used the wrong instances or what but I didn't find the results i got that great. However that is the reason people say you should host you own instance. Hopefully it works out I really enjoy the idea of hosting my own instance

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  • Have you also experienced this worsening of DuckDuckGo?

Yes.

  • Which other more privacy-respecting alternatives do you recommend?

I'm in the same boat. I'll be trying out these answers.

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 2 days ago
[–] corgi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Been happy with Kagi for the past few months. So far no thoughts of switching back to either Google or DDG.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I use StartPage because it’s the closest to Google 10+ years ago.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

True about the good old-Google feeling! I want to find how much about of the shadiness claims about Startpage have been substantiated or denied.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 14 points 2 days ago

I've definitely felt the enshittification of DDG. A couple of years ago they would start dropping hits related to my location into my search results, even when I had region off and private search by default. That gave me the impression that my IP address was being used and possibly passed on to Bing, but I don't have the chops to confirm it 🤷

[–] RoachFire@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I run my own instance of SearX. Very reliable.

[–] dogma11@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Just setup my own instance! Happy so far!

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Duckduckgo gives you Bing results. If you like Microsoft they are up the alley. If not tough luck.

DDG is often but not always a lot worse than Google in my experience.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I didn't know about this – that may explain the problem.

[–] Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago

The main problem for me is how much DuckDuckGo priorities recency in the results over relevancy

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Searx is good enough if you set up plenty of engines - I do look up quite a lot of stuff and not once in the past 3 months did I go "yeah I need to use google for this".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 7 points 2 days ago

I mostly use startpage, but occasionally ecosia and mojeek.

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kagi is pretty amazing. You have to pay but the peace of mind is worth it for the respect of your privacy. FastGPT is a phenomenally helpful tool that I use multiple times per day. Kagi.com

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've noticed this is the case but not that it's declining. I haven't used it that long.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Admittedly it could be a temporary fluctuation of some kind.

load more comments
view more: next ›