this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
506 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23101 readers
4193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has been mired in controversy since Donald Trump first nominated him, is now "unlikely to remain in his role," according to his own former department spokesperson on Sunday.

The report includes "remarkable accusations" from a former Hegseth aide and comes the same day as it was reported that the Secretary was involved in a second unsecured Signal chat in which sensitive attack plans were shared. Hegseth was mocked for the reported security misstep.

In a piece entitled, "Former Pentagon official warns department’s dysfunction could topple Hegseth," Politico quotes John Ullyot, the former top Defense Department spokesperson, as saying, "The last month has been a full-blown meltdown at the Pentagon."

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 6 points 1 day ago

Only hire based on merit. Lol

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder which bootlicker will replace them. At some point in time, the pool of incompetent asskissers will be exhausted - what will Trump do then?

Hell always be able to find a boot licker, they'll just be increasingly incompetent.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 117 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The Politico article is better.

The remarkable accusations by a former official — who left only two days ago and insists he still supports the Trump administration’s national security policies — underscores the infighting and upheaval that has turned increasingly public in recent weeks. ... Ullyot was sidelined after he defended the removal in March of a story discussing the service of baseball legend Jackie Robinson, part of a larger purge of diversity-related military webpages.

So this guy who quit and is now saying that Hegseth is not long for this world is himself a fucking Nazi.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 days ago (2 children)

he still supports the Trump administration’s national security policies

One of these guys needs to walk me through what they hope Trump will achieve. Because I don't see it.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seize, retain, and exploit power.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then they'll have to share their definition of power. It can't include soft power, as they keep squandering the soft power the US had.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 days ago

They don’t understand or at best, believe in soft power.

MAGAts want a war.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

If they are religious properly they want the second coming end of life stuff. If they are from the confederacy they will most likely will want go bring slavery back, or a form of it.

Both will want women and black rights to he diminish. Because loser boys want to get laid and the only option is force marriage or something along these lines.

Also they are following project 2025, but they are so bad that you cant tell for sure..

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good thing the nazis are making unforced errors and attacking each other because god knows the dems cant organize themselves to do the job of fighting them.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

An administration full of cluster B personality traits and backbiting, name a more classic combination.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 130 points 2 days ago

First they came for the DEI hires, but I said nothing because I was not a DEI hire.

Then they came for the DUI hires and I said nothing because I was too busy looking for the bottle of Johnny Walker in my desk.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

WHY? Just because he told MULTIPLE PEOPLE WITHOUT SECURITY CLEARANCES about an Act Of War over an Unvetted App? That's WOKE!

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I mean haven't we all given nuclear launch codes to complete strangers who also happen to be Russian agents? Come on! Lighten up!

[–] iamnotme@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago

Fucking snowflakes

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every morning after a holiday is a meltdown for him, due to the hangover.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Don't you mean every morning ever?

[–] MarkAB@mastodon.world 35 points 2 days ago

@MicroWave “Elect a clown, expect a circus”. Hegseth is just another clown in the car.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is this the least qualified cabinet in the history of the US? Maybe they should have gone with more DEI hires.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago

And not the DUI hires.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 2 days ago

All Hegseth has to do slither up to Trump; cuddle, a quick handjob, and BOOM! All is forgiven.

Again, this is a clear example of why you don't put a completely unqualified alcoholic in charge of TS information.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is he past the 1 Scaramuchi mark yet?

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's coming up on 8 mooches.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

I think The Mooch is quite proud of how quickly he got kicked out in retrospect.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good! Let's get someone serious in there. I get middle-school vibes from this guy.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol you’re going to get another circus clown

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Sadly, you may be right. I don't see the humour though.

[–] nebhelo@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

This is the kind of inner sabotage that can work in their favor. As in Israel, where incompetent defense leaders allowed Palestinians to overrun Israel is and start their war. ..which allowed him to hold on to power. People he should protect died, and he benefitted.

So when the Republicans fail to defend our country bc they are inept parodies of what leaders should be, they might gain the kind of power they'll never let go

What an irony when the commanders in chief might benefit from their own failure...

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You gotta be REAL stupid (or moral) to get booted from a Trump administration.

And I'd bet my bottom dollar this chode isn't getting booted for having a moral compass.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Trump's cabinet had insane turnover last time, he loves using people then throwing them away

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

Fascist trap themselves on this all the time. If they're competent, they will either run far away or work to undermine you. If they're loyal, then they won't be very competent.

Fascism is a lot more fragile than it looks on the surface because of issues like this.

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago
[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

We’re kicking people out of the administration of the military in the most over-militarized country in the world due to incompetence now? Sounds like a nice change.