It's beyond me that after all this people are still using Twitter
this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
572 points (98.8% liked)
News
29029 readers
3951 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Same with Facebook, instagram, WhatsApp, etc. but the response usually boils down to “I like to communicate with people on [platform] and since they won’t leave I can’t leave”
But Twitter now has a legit alternative that many have gone to. Unfortunate that's not mastodon, but still.
Worst part is people seem to believe they have to uninstall to use the alternative, by all means have both installed and slowly make the switch, your phone won't explode if you do that. I know I have to keep WhatsApp installed because some business only use that to take orders, but I can keep contacts somewhere else too.
I've tried to get away from WhatsApp. I've got the majority of my friends off it (at least when they communicated with me). But some people just will not leave due to familiarity/fear of change. I'm still working on them, but I'm pretty sure it's a lost cause.
You can only go so far. And cutting people off because they won't move away from something like WhatsApp isn't always feasible.
But I agree with you: I don't understand why people still use those platforms. I think it's because they don't keep up on things, or just don't care.
It's honestly terrifying how much of a grip whatsapp has. People like to make fun of the US for being stuck on sms and imessage, but at least we're not beholden to Zucc for our main communication
What's wrong with SMS?
It's insecure, can only handle small files, no features like read receipts or reactions. I can go on.
Good alternatives?
Okay what about RCS
It's better, but in practice seems to have ended up entirely controlled by Google
I hate whatsapp with a passion and only ever used it because everyone does. After a while i realised how dumb it is to do something because of other people and uninstalled it. I works pretty good, it's just for work i sometimes have to install it for one person who need to send something.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Serves you right for supporting a Nazi owned platform.
Get off that site.
"free speech absolutist"
He only means his own.
free speech ~~absolutist~~ abolitionist
Again. Why the fuck do people who claim to hate Elon still use Twitter/X?
I suggest everybody to read up on the Twitter files.
https://www.ungaway.com/p/twitter-files-1-11-downloads-pdf
Part 2 (Release 2) is where they talk about the labels, such as "Do Not Amplify".
Musk was talking all big about how this bullshit sucks and he wants to get rid of it. But he's just doing the same thing, on an even worse scale.
Oh, shadowbanning, or something like "Do Not Amplify", is against the DSA in the EU and thus illegal.
X is a propaganda machine for people that need to believe their bigotry and racism come from a place of "virtue."
I used Twitter for all of a day, but you have to be real with it
It's an ocean with a whole lot of toxic spills. The whole thing is polluted, but some of it is nearly clean while others are basically tar.
There's too many people doing too many things on that platform to condemn them all... We need to get most of them somewhere safer, but that's where they are right now
I mean, anybody using Twitter is ok with Elon Musk. You can give the excuse that people on social security have to use twitter, but otherwise there's really nothing necessary and there's no telling what is a bot or a bastard. Facebook and reddit were heading the same way before I dumped them for lemmy.
If that was true, why is there constant news about him getting butthurt from critical tweets and using his authority to suppress them?
There's a lot of people still on Twitter for a simple reason that has nothing to do with Musk... Getting a population to relocate is hard. That's where they were before the takeover, that's where all types of public figures have to be to reach followers, and so that's where people go to interact with them
It's going to be a slow decline as alternatives slowly grow to critical mass, and eventually the dead platform will no longer be the place with the biggest reach to most intended audiences
Sounds like a lot of cope from somebody who has accepted nazis as part of their life. Sounds shitty to me, but you do you, boo boo
Lol. I accept that the Nazis exist, and that they've taken over mainstream social media
I also don't use mainstream social media and I strongly encourage others not to. And I also face reality. People value their dooms scrolling too much to listen, only one person in my life has made a change, everyone else shrugs and says that's where their friends are
Any platform that allows Nazi speech is a Nazi platform, but not everyone on a Nazi platform is a Nazi. Social media grows and shrinks according to the network effect... Twitter will only completely die once another micro blogging platform becomes the default. We've seen it play out over and over
You have to accept reality as it is and meet people where they are. Applying your own morals to others does nothing but make you feel superior in your own little bubble
load more comments
(9 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
It is still a pretty dumb strategy to criticize an oligarch on their own platform. They could even edit the words he said and there’s nothing you can do.
It's a good way to demonstrate that those 'free speech absolutists' are always full of shit. They just want to be able to say the N-word again, and they'll absolutely continue to do everything to suppress your speech, especially if it's something that threatens their money.
This doesn’t need demonstrating as most people have known that these fascist assholes are massive hypocrites for a long time.
They don’t care that you notice. They’re just gonna keep doing it anyway.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
That is the kind of "free speech" fElon wanted.
It is not clear what precisely happened to the three accounts that feuded with Mr. Musk in late December.
The number of views and user accounts are fraudulent. Botnets push right wing nonsense, until you piss of the Nazi Fuckwit. Then the bots stop promoting you and you fall into obscurity. They were never really popular, just the illusion of it like a concert in a stadium with cardboard cutouts of fans. "Sold out"
It's not even the bots; it's that the feed ranking on 𝕏itter is tuned based on Musk's whim, and he's most likely modifying it so that people dot get seen if they're not going along with his Nazism or cult.
Probably both.
He's on the record as saying freedom of speech, not freedom of reach in regards to X.
It just means he won't ban you (but he'll do that too!) but he has absolutely no problem making it so it's almost impossible to see your content.
Not surprising, this is the point of decentralization, one idiot can't dictate everything.
Well, duh. Yeah let's criticize someone who has full control of their platform. What do people honestly expect to do with Twitter? It's pointless.
Musk demands control.
woke mind parasite control, hes been speaking of.
Those peaches are mighty frosty