this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
1489 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

69600 readers
3654 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Courtesy to Twitter user XdanielArt (date of publication: 8 June 2024)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thespicyguy@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

The wave of GenP refugees today appreciate this post.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

GIMP is unfortunately not a good competitor, the UX/UI is atrocious, and that's after spending 25 years using it now.. I switched to Krita for most things at this point. GIMP needs some sort of revamp.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I see two new features that look fantastic, but the rest of the UI seems likely unchanged. I'll definitely give it a shot though.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

Seriously, gimp is barely usable for anything, they need to put the damn thing our of our misery.

And it spawned gtk, which is yet another monument to software masochism.

Will give krita a shot, this shouldn't be that hard.

[–] PeterisBacon@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

Affinity Designer 2 might be the only one close to what Adobr Illustrator can handle.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

Adobe... Fucks people hard.

[–] couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago

Shout out to pdfgear.

Does almost all the pdf file manipulation anyone needs and it's free.

[–] clot27@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

is the image not loading only for me?

[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It loads for me on voyager, but is unreadable.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Another great alternative to Acrobat (Reader) is Okular; it's free, open source and runs on Linux, Windows and macOS.

It's been my go-to PDF reader since switching to Linux, since it already came pre-installed with Manjaro KDE.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dirtySourdough@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Libre Office Draw is another Ai alternative

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 126 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Honestly, GIMP is not a good alternative to Photoshop. I know, "it's free" is enough for many people, but it ... just isn't.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 80 points 2 days ago (5 children)

With GIMP 3.0 it's a bit better at least, they've finally added non-destructive editing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfaq-Cm1ZkA

Full changelog here:
https://www.gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-3.0.html

I'd dare say that unless you've already learnt Photoshop (and have to unlearn it) then Darktable+GIMP works fine for home photo editing.
If you're used to Photoshop and your skills with it is what puts bread on the table... then I completely understand not switching tools.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah but it should tell you something that they just figured out non-destructive editing by 2025. Love the team, want to see it succeed, but it’s not PS at all.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My understanding is that a lot of tech debt has been removed with the release of 3.0 and I'm hopeful it will make future updates simpler and faster. :)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

GIMP didn't "just figure out non-destructive editing by 2025". You're talking as if it was something that the GIMP development team just decided to randomly add recently, after previously ignoring user demands.

The foundation for that functionality (GEGL) has been in development for ages and was also used for some functionality in 2.6 for a long time. The reason why it took this long is that it's a pretty fundamental change to how the app works. Also, that meshed with other upcoming changes at the time. Also, small development team.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have said several times I have gimp and support them. I didn’t think they just discovered it - I’m saying the fact that in 2025 they just implemented it is indicative of why I say they’re behind.

They do good work. Yes they’re a small team. It doesn’t change the fact that the software has limitations.

The question isn’t “are they working hard?” or “are they doing a lot for what they are/their size?” It’s “how does it stack against PS?” And of course they can’t hang with the billion dollar international company with an army of programmers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Yeah I really like what they’re doing and I applaud their efforts, but they are a solid decade behind PS when it comes to feature parity.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Rhusta@midwest.social 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Does anybody have a similar list of alternatives but for the Autodesk Suite/Ecosystem? Some open source CAD and BIM programs, some FOSS modeling and rendering programs?

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

If you are looking for FOSS CAD, then FreeCAD 1.0 is about the only game in town. SolveSpace is fine for fairly simple uses but lacks all the advanced toys one might like. Nor has it been updated in 3 years now. Siemans SolidEdge has a free community edition, but it's Widows only. OnShape is is a popular alternative to Fusion, and is fully cloud based, but it is restricted like Fusion.

As an acolyte that wears the sackcloth and ashes of FreeCAD, there is a growing community of tutorials, (I highly recommend MangoJelly on youtube) for beginners to learn with. But the learning curve can be steep as you get past the basics. There is a FreeCAD community here, but it's small and not very active. Sadly the best place for answers remains on reddit.

[–] Jezza@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I've spent the better half of six months trying to answer this question. (not continuously, just passively)

For some background, I used fusion 360 for a number of years, so I witnessed it turn to absolute shit, but that means parametric CADs are my cup of tea.

Here's my thoughts.

FreeCAD: I tried this, but I'll admit I gave up quickly.
It doesn't feel like a complete solution. It feels like more and more tools have been tacked on without the realisation that people who haven't been using it for years are going to have even less of an idea of where to start.
I do want to come back and give it another shot, as it hit 1.0 recently.

Plasticity:
I was originally interested in it because if how easy it could be to model something. After having used it for a number of days, I agree that it's relatively intuitive to get something going, but it lacks the precise feeling of a parametric CAD. Don't get me wrong, you can be precise with it, but it feels something akin to a 3D paint and less like a CAD program.
I can imagine if you just want to do something small, it would be sufficient.

OpenSCAD: I've been a programmer for 15+ years, and I expected to like this.
Sadly, if you lack a strong maths background, you'll find this difficult to master.
I'll be the first to admit my maths isn't as great as it used to be.
The beauty of a parametric CAD is that I don't need to know how to position everything exactly, I can just give it the constraints and it manages it for me.
With this, it felt like I kept on testing a value, measuring the resulting dimension that I was trying to go for, tweaking it again, rinse and repeat.
Didn't feel like I was programming, it felt like I was writing the 3D model itself with a DSL.
The lack of fillets and chamfers was also frustrating.

And this brings me to my current recommendation:

SolveSpace:

I've been using it for about a month now, and I've been happy with it.
It didn't take much to understand what it's trying to do.
It's completely parametric and I felt at home pretty quickly.
You can do fillets and chamfers easily, it just requires a bit of creative work.

Let me know if you have any other questions.
I'd be happy to answer them.

[–] jbd@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Try blender. I use it for CAD.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

It really isn't made for that anymore but I too find myself using it for CAD occasionally too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 33 points 2 days ago

Or if you have to use Adobe products, at least have the decency not to pay for them.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wish there was a good FOSS Acrobat/Blue beam alternative.

I use those tools for the majority of my work as an engineer.

[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

bluebeam is great

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Ive been using Sumatra for pdfs. It’s open source too.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 70 points 2 days ago (5 children)

For PDF "your browser" should be the default recommendation. Firefox allows to add text and images now. Gimp can also be used to edit PDF.

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Browser is nice. On Linux though, Okular is superb (except for its occasional problems with forms).

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm really disappointed not to see Okular there. It's FOSS, and it's very cozy and useful.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Countering Animator with Blender, that's brutal. For at least some stuff Blender is also the better Illustrator.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

What the actual fuck is adobe acrobat? A pdf editor with subscription model payment? Firefox, the browser, can edit pdf files. It's 2025.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Firefox can do basic annotating, adding text and adding pictures but it can't make a new PDF from scratch.

You may be confusing Adobe Acrobat Reader with Adobe Acrobat? Full Acrobat is the proprietary tool to make a PDF file from scratch including some of the more complex functions.

PDF is an open standard and has been for a while, so there are now plenty of alternatives for most of the functions. LibreOffice Draw and Inkscape can do a lot of PDF creation functions but not all. There are also "print to PDF" options to create basic PDF documents too.

However some of the more niche functions are not widely supported or well supported; and there isn't really any opensource dedicated PDF maker that I'm aware of. Layout tools are abundant but I think it's things like building forms and document signing that is less easily replicated. There is Master PDF - a fully functional PDF maker which is proprietary and available for Linux; it $80 for a perpetual license. I'm not aware of any other alternatives myself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Adobe acrobat is THE PDF editor. PDF is a proprietary format created and developed by Adobe. Any software that can edit PDFs is doing so in a format they do not have any control over. And there just aren't any proper PDF editors that are feature complete. now if you're an individual who needs to make a PDF in the privacy of your own home, by all means, use a cheap or free or FOSS application to do so. But if you need that PDF to be readable and useable and seamlessly compatible on other computers for other users for ever? Better pay the Adobe tax because there is a good chance, it won't look the way you expect it to when someone opens it up in Adobe which their company definitely has.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Davinci Resolve has to be one of the most jam packed free software packages available… seriously, it absolutely trounces Premiere at evvvverything

the model of free for everything except if features you’d want for producing a professional movie, and financed by hardware sales - that you don’t need unless you’re a professional - is absolutely incredible for home users

[–] r_deckard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't trounce PPro, they're about equal IME. I've used both and it's the price that makes it beat PPro. And you get the full version for free when you buy a Blackmagic camera.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

personally, my reasoning for saying it trounces it is the integration of all the tools: no switching to after effects etc

but beyond that, ppro colour correction is just soooooo far behind

granted i haven’t really used it much, so i might not have “got” its workflow - it took a while for resolves to click - but it just seems so disjointed and clunky to do anything beyond cutting together a basic video

[–] r_deckard@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I've edited a couple of independent shorts with PPro - I didn't find it lacking at all. I like Resolve, but I can work with either one.

PPro has multi-camera features, that's much more than a basic video.

The feature set of the Adobe suite is more comprehensive, but Resolve is a bit easier to use.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Affinity + BMD’s Davinci Resolve FTW. Best combo IMOO. I did the switch back in 2017 and never looked back. Worth the single low price and long term free upgrades. For acrobat replacement (basics only) Apple’s preview is flawless and Ubuntu 25.10 Pages looks promising. Looking for recommendations for Lightroom replacement. Apple’s pixelmator purchase looks promising but I don’t want subscription.

[–] Baguette@lemm.ee 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Neat list, but imo photoshop is closer to being called a photomanipulation/image editor than photography. lightroom is the more dedicated photography software.

Also I wouldn't call paint.net an alternative to photoshop. I love paint.net but its a relatively simple image editor and its functionally limited even with plugins.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OmgItBurns@discuss.online 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Dreamweaver is still used? I used it a bit back in the day when Macromedia was around and shortly after Adobe got a hold of it. How does it work with the modern web? Does it work well with modern programming languages or is it still just a WYSIWYG HTML editor?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago

I used it briefly in a class around 2015ish. It worked about as well as any Adobe software does, but honestly it was really difficult to use and quite frankly it probably would take just as long to learn the HTML and CSS skills necessary to make a decent website as it would to learn how to make one in Dreamweaver

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›