this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
108 points (95.8% liked)

politics

23316 readers
2748 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

This leave out the most egregious thing they are doing: installing Starlink backdoors all over government.

At best, Elon and his team are making sure that he has unfettered access to all the data for his AI shenanigans. But where is the data being held? How do we know Elon's backdoor has not, itself, been backdoored?

At worst, he is actively selling it all to foreign powers.

There is zero accountability, so we really dont know....

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 hours ago

But where is the data being held?

Highest bidder?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 42 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Boy howdy, what a head scratcher!

I swear to fucking god the intentional obliviousness of the vast majority of our media apparatus is going to fucking kill us all

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago

But at the same time I feel like it reflects the obliviousness of the vast majority of the population. The election in the US kinda proved that. So if anything, mentioning it as often as possible is probably the best call.

[–] blakenong 5 points 5 hours ago

They give people what they want. :(

[–] socsa@piefed.social 17 points 5 hours ago

It's partially an ego thing for Musk. I work with tons of these dunning Kruger techbro types who think they know better than everyone else and will eat a lot of shit to "prove" it. They have a chip on their shoulder because they think their engineering degree should give them some mythical status and get increasingly agitated when nobody fucking cares.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago

My first instinct when I saw this was "anyone with a brain already knows this." But after a little bit of extra thought I remembered what the average person thinks and how the average person voted last election and I was like "yeah, we should probably talk about this as much as possible."

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

https://archive.ph/1sC0H

There are many, many theories on this. In March, Alex Nowrasteh and Ryan Bourne of the libertarian Cato Institute tried to organize them into “six theoretical models for understanding DOGE’s action to date”:

  1. DOGE is seeking to purge progressive influence within the federal government.
  2. DOGE is a scaled-up public version of Musk’s style of corporate restructuring applied to the federal government.
  3. DOGE is the first step of a public relations campaign to build popular support for spending cuts.
  4. DOGE is an essential component of a Trump administration legal challenge to expand the president’s power of impoundment.
  5. DOGE provides political cover for Congress to be even more fiscally irresponsible.
  6. DOGE is about self-interest and cronyism.
  7. DOGE is building a surveillance state or, if you prefer, a less-siloed government.
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Sadly, it could be a combination of all if these things.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Without exaggeration, this may be the stupidest chart I've ever seen in my life.

Trend line of Musk spending cut promises

A declining trend line of Musk's spending cut promises means by end of year he'll apparently start promising $2T in new spending by DOGE according to these geniuses.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If you'd actually bothered to read any of the words, you'd have realized that this was done tongue-in-cheek.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 hours ago

Word hard, picture easy, me angry!!!


Yeah idk why people get mad about shit they clearly didn't read.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Reminds me of the old xkcd where a guy tells a bride on her wedding day that, extrapolating from that day's events, within two months she'll have four dozen husbands.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The stupidity of anyone asking this all innocent like Of course it’s not for efficiency it’s a fucking coup and massive corruption wake the fuck up media

[–] blakenong 0 points 6 hours ago

Money is worthless. Data is the new money. In a time when your dollar is worth a penny, you can still sell data like gold.