this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
205 points (99.0% liked)

Asklemmy

48008 readers
908 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Not a film, but a novel:

Starflight 3000 by R.W. Mackelworth

If I remember, it was about this asteroid called "The Biosphere" that got hollowed out and sent on relativistic speeds through deep space to seed other solar systems with human colonies. The inside of it was set up like a giant rural town with massive skies, and a foot print the size of New York. And that's a cool ass premise.

But the book was so fucking milquetoast and bland. I could not tell you anything about the protagonist, their challenges, or anything.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago

Equilibrium

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't watched it yet, but this basically confirms my suspicions.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

It's worth a watch if only just for the effects and the world-building. I'm not against the premise, either, but like the title of the sub points out there was poor execution.

[–] simontherockjohnson@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

Mortal Engines is literally a refutation of liberalism in a capitalist system. It's about how municipal darwinism doesn't work.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Downsizing

First 20 minutes (give or take) seemed like a solid start. But then they did absolutely nothing with the concept.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago

It kind of did just wander.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

Oof. Horrible movie. Bad Matt Damon!

[–] ninth_plane@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Mortal Kombat (2021) opened with a great "feudal China with elemental magic" clan story that could have been an amazing movie, but then they jumped forward in time and everything after that was a let down.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The ideas behind They Live are fascinating and deserved better treatment than a 20-minute alley fight about sunglasses.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I love that movie, and that fight scene, but damn you're right.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Thank you! I was being as tactful as possible, since negative statements about any aspect of that movie whatsoever, or the acting skills of Roddy Piper, usually receive nothing but douchevotes and insults lol. It's a very entertaining movie.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Lucy

It’s entertaining as all hell. It doesn’t pretend to be anything more, so I don’t understand the hate it gets. Just turn off your brain, and have some fun. It’s not supposed to be hard sci-fi.

[–] BatmamAoD@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

"turn off your brain" is a pretty ironic requirement.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

LoL. Totally. Gotta use 0% of your brain in order to enjoy a movie about using 100% of your brain.

But anyway, it’s just code for β€˜get stoned as fuck before watching this.’

[–] a_camera_is_a_gun@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

and it's only 89 minutes, it doesn't get stale or repetitive!

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_(2014_film)

The audience for Lucy was split evenly between men and women, with 65 percent being over age 25.[54] Nikki Rocco, president for domestic distribution at Universal Studios, said, "To have a female lead in an original property absolutely made a difference. Scarlett is a star, and her presence [in the film] made it a lot more appealing for women."[55] Michael Bodey of The Australian commented that women having comprised half the audience is "a seemingly new precedent for an action film" and that, because of its box office performance, Lucy is the film out of all of Besson's film work "likely to have the greatest cultural impact."[18]

It seems like it definitely resonated with a lot of people, will check it out. Luc Besson can be hit and miss, but his films are always memorable

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I think in Scarlett’s Hot Ones episode, she mentioned that Meryl Streep told her she loved Lucy. Which makes me think Meryl might be a big stoner. Hilarious.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Jurassic World. Just give me 90 minutes of dino mutants fighting, I don't give a shit about Chris Pratt nor some random kids.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

+1 for I do not give a shit about Chris Pratt

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago

He'll never be my Mario.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

The original Purge. I thought all the background stuff and setting were super interesting, but the film itself was a generic home invasion movie. The sequel expanded on all the stuff I was interested in, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

CATS

Cats is not a complicated musical. All they had to do was animate it and get actual voice actors/singers. I've seen sketches for what I think was a Tim Burton sketch, and that would have been a million times better. I don't know who looked at Cat's and was like, "Yup, we need CGI." It looks horrendous and sounds bad more often than not. The musical is already pretty out there, how much more fun would that movie had been if we had animators working on it. The creative visuals, colors, motifs. Not to mention a cat is a wonderfully complex animal to animate just because of how they move. That movie could have been a visual delight in part with the Spiderman movies if they let it, but noooooo. Let's make a nightmare.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I still feel obliged to post it, so that the memories don't fade.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 14 hours ago (9 children)
[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 8 points 5 hours ago

I'm asking you politely but firmly to leave

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago

Cabin in the Woods is fine art.

10/10 Premise 10/10 Execution

I'm helping my teenager get through all the horror tropes so we can watch Cabin in the Woods together.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Hot take.

I loved cabin in the woods!

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, I don't think anybody actually thought it was a bad movie. The real hot take is saying it was.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί