this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
97 points (94.5% liked)

Privacy

38001 readers
553 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My current phone is 7 years old, does not support recent android versions, and battery life is becoming atrocious. This feels like right time to change my phone.

Currently, I know of & am considering 3 options:

  • Google Pixel
  • iPhone
  • Samsung Galaxy

I heard that Pixel is the best choice for privacy, despite it being Google^TM. Should I go with it, and install Graphene OS or similar options? The very fact that the name "Google" is attached makes me nervous. Also, I don't think I can trust android, so I would have to install Graphene OS or the like. In the case, app support would be lacking, though.

I am considering iPhone as well, since it has "reputation" of being secure. Of course, Apple can access my data, but that might be a good enough compromise? Honestly, I don't know. It's the best supported option as well - lots of apps support iPhone.

Galaxy is just the one that I am the most familiar with (my current one is Galaxy S8). I don't trust it, though. Do they even make good hardware nowadays?

EDIT: Turns out, Pixel phones are poorly supported by local telecomm companies. It is relatively cheap though. Still worth it?

EDIT2: I heard that data & message is fine, but the call quality is impacted by lack of VoLTE compatibility.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gortbrown@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Out of the options you mentioned, Pixel with a custom rom (GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, etc.) is probably the best bet. Seconded by any Samsung that could run a custom rom, though I agree with others here that the hardware is better on the Pixels. Plus they have extra security hardware features that will be better. Of course, if things are weird with your telecom, that might effect things (trust me, been there with an Ubuntu Touch phone before.)

Another option you could look at depending on where you are is Murena's phones. They have a bunch of options pre-flashed with their de-Googled rom /e/ os. Not my favorite rom, but still not bad! And of course those can be flashed with another rom if you want as well!

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Pinephone. It is what I use.

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I owned 4 Samsungs: S8, S10e, S22 and S24 Ultra. Their products got worse. An example is the recent One Ui 7 update, it is just terrible: My notification area that works perfectly fine before, is now changed; my battery life got worse..etc.

Even if I ignore the update, Samsung products are just not great anymore. Remember when a Galaxy can take really great photos? Those days are gone. My S24 Ultra takes the worst pictures in comparison to a Xiaomi or Huawei. Heck, even the controversial Asus Zenfone 10 takes better picture. Sure the Galaxy has better Megapixels, but the AI bullshit makes it so the colors are all wrong.

With that said, you want to go for Pixel + GrapheneOS. Anything that is close to stock Android should be ok. Oh, and stay away from anything with a lot of AI.

[–] domoel@feddit.org 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This! I even installed an AOSP Rom to get rid of this shit.

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 1 points 11 hours ago

On a Samsung Galaxy? I have one and am also similarly frustrated with the changes, but it seems like the support for custom roms is poor.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 25 points 20 hours ago

I am considering iPhone as well, since it has “reputation” of being secure.

Which doesn't mean private.

Pixel+Graphene is a common suggestion.

For real privacy you can't beat these.

[–] fullovellas@lemm.ee 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I've been rocking a Pixel 8 pro with Graphene OS for a year and change and it was a great experience after being an iPhone user for 8 years aproximately.

The install process is great, automatic and foolproof, you just need the phone, usb cable (probably came with your phone) and a computer with a Chromium-based browser.

App support hasn't been a problem for me, you can reach for Aurora Store (anonymous Play Store client) if you really need something from there. Otherwise you have F-droid and the usual suspects and also Accrescent, which Graphene offers through its own app store, but barely has anything as of today.

I setup Shelter to have some apps more isolated and being able to just not see them if I want, namely some Microsoft apps I need for work and some that depend o Google's services. Shelter is recommended by privacyguides.org, so you should be fine using it.

I think Pixel/Graphene is probably your best option for security if you need it. Privacy I guess you can achieve many other ways.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Any inconveniences you've noticed with Graphene? For example I've heard tap to pay functionality doesn't work.

[–] fullovellas@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I guess there are some tradeoffs, for sure. I've encountered a couple things:

  • Bad location functionality. The phone is most likely to blame for this, but I can't say with certainty. GOS uses a custom proxy server for location related operations, so maybe that's the reason, or maybe I fiddled too much with settings and messed something up.
  • Very ocasional crashes due to exploit protection. This almost never happens, but can be annoying. Some app may have a bug that would be overlooked by another OS or try to access some feature that is considered exploitable and the system will kill it, letting you know why with a notification. You can fine-tune these protections at the system or app level to make it work for you though (at your own risk).
  • If "tap to pay" refers to NFC payments through some app like Google Pay, I think they do work. You just have to enable NFC (you can even enable it only if the device is unlocked, which is cool), and configure contactless payments with your payment app. I don't use this feature though, so I'm not speaking from personal experience.

I think that's it, really. I found the actual user experience to be quite breezy.

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago
  • The location functionality has significantly improved recently since it no longer relies solely on GPS, but yeah, it could still be improved.
  • Generally, I've found the apps that tend to have problems with exploit protection are games, VPNs, and banking apps (which is probably the sort of app you'd most want exploit protection on...). I'm not sure if I've ever had an actual problem with other apps honestly.
  • While NFC works, Google Pay does not. Google needs to basically certify the OS for it to work, and they refuse to do so (monopoly gonna monopoly). Basically, this means if you're in the US or some other country where Google Pay is pretty much the only payment option on Android, NFC payments don't work. Some places in Europe at least have NFC payments available through banking apps though, so if you happen to reside in one of those countries and your bank has one of those apps with payment support, you should be fine.
[–] chirospasm@lemmy.ml 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)
  1. Pixel, and immediately install GrapheneOS.
  2. A Linux based phone, like the PinePhone or Purism 5, and run your Android apps (if desired) inside Waydroid.
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Pixel, and immediately install GrapheneOS.

I am surprised Google still allows to open the bootloader, with all the bitching they have been doing towards sideloading apps, play integrity BS and making android more similar to iOS in general terms...

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Googles devices have always been able to have custom ROMs, I even had a Nexus 2 long ago and that was moddable.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, but you need to concede that their efforts to block "unofficial" users have strengthened as of lately... That's why I think they might do a Xiaomi move sooner or later.

[–] dzso@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

I didn't realize that Purism phones don't have internationally compatible modems. As someone who travels a lot, that's unfortunately a dealbreaker.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 12 points 22 hours ago

best choice for privacy [...] “reputation” of being secure

Disentangling privacy and security, and potentially other priorities, e.g. secrecy, anonymity, etc might be important before making suggestion.

Another way to help deciding what is the best choice for you, not necessarily anybody else, is what is your threat model?

An analogy I thought recently is "Are you putting a very tough lock on your door but leaving the windows opened?" or "Are you locking your car but walking outside naked?". The point here is not to imply that people do obvious mistakes but rather that, truly there are people who go to parades naked AND lock their cars. The concerns can be orthogonal and thus must be considered individually. For that I believe thinking about "who the enemy is" as a way to discover your threat model is interesting, namely :

Are you worried by :

  • government getting your private data without your consent?
  • government doing so automatically and cheaply through intermediaries e.g. platforms?
  • government doing so via extremely costly individual security attacks e.g. 0-days, with a "legit" hacker manually doing it?
  • small private companies?
  • platforms?
  • your actual neighbor?

The answer to those questions will then provide you a more limited set of options. Basically I would argue only the 3rd option ties tightly with security but that's up to a certain extent and companies like Pegasus shows that it can also be done at scale, for profit. Still, AFAICT it wasn't done for a random person BUT that was few years ago.

Anyway one you go through options, e.g. iPhone vs Android vs deGoogled Android vs Linux phone vs dumb phone you will see your usage itself will have to change. This is not necessarily a bad thing but it is not something most people will think about initially.

I suggest then to... try. I know it's not the answer you want but what you are asking for, I believe, is genuine change. It is about the technology, yes, but it also is about your habits. Consequently it is a process with some success, failures, cascading changes and thus IMHO must be iterated on.

It is worth it though.

[–] dajoho@sh.itjust.works 11 points 22 hours ago

Using a Pixel 6 with Graphene here with google services in their sandbox. It's pretty neat, especially with apps like Firefox+uBlock and GrayJay, which let me also block 99% of ads, which was very important to me. I have not had trouble with any banking apps either.

[–] kungfushoe@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Please note: You must buy the "Unlocked - Works with any carrier" version of the Pixel via Googles website (or from a reputable source that ensures it is/was not carrier locked). Anything else will have a permanently locked boot loader and no way to install Graphene.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago

Depends on the carrier and the specific deal. I have a Pixel 7 Pro from T-Mobile. And it was able to be unlocked after one year of service in good standing. T-Mobile has traditionally been pretty good about that, though that kind of thing often shifts once companies have major mergers. And the Sprint merger screwed them up in a lot of ways that are still working their way down to customers losing services and features.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SilliusMaximus@mander.xyz 9 points 23 hours ago

I think you're mixing privacy with security, iPhone is secure but it's not private, it's slighty more private than Google Android but not what would you call private.

Samsung can soft brick your phone so basically backdoor.

Google Pixel with custom ROM like GrapheneOS or CalyxOS is considered to be best in terms of privacy.

Another cheaper alternative if you don't want to give money to Google or spend too much is Motorola G32, G42, G52 with CalyxOS but to unlock bootloader you have to make account on their website.

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

In my opinion, the Google Pixel with GrapheneOS is considered the gold standard in terms of security and privacy. While I am not fully knowledgeable about its capabilities, it offers a comprehensive suite of security features.

The iPhone is also a viable option. You can easily swap between iCloud to a more secure encrypted provider for both cloud storage and photo backups. Additionally, any notes application can be replaced with a more secure alternative.

Samsung phones can support a range of operating system images that can be flashed, including LineageOS. However, I am not fully aware of all the available options.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] teehexe@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Not advice, just an anecdote I switched to grapheme (pixel 8a) not long ago and its really great I haven't even been tempted to go back. I think its a great choice

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Just to let you know, GrapheneOS uses AOSP (the base Android system) and sandboxed Google Play Services, making it compatible with 90% of all Android applications. From what I've heard (don't take my word for it), the apps that have the least compatibility / more breakage are banking ones.

[–] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

The banking app thing is unfortunate, but then I kinda realized that I don't really need them anyway. I have all the features I need in browser, and text notifications set up for when I spend money.

The wallet not working REALLY sucks, but if I look on the bright side that's one less thing Google knows about me and my spending.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago

Pixel unlocked and install grapheneOS or lineageOS

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You should consider buying a flip phone and only put in SIM card when you need it, assuming you can acquire SIM card without your name on it where you live

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Flipphones are just less feature, same spying.

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

These flip phones dont have anything other than a SIM card

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

No end to end encryption, it's plaintext for the service provider

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

For the vast majority of flip phones currently available on the market, if they’re not running some version of KiaOS, they’re running stock Android - with all the Google spying that entails - under the hood.

load more comments
view more: next ›