this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
338 points (94.9% liked)

Games

40198 readers
2449 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Karl Jobst and SomeOrdinaryGamers (separate video linked here) have accused Jirard Khalil of lying to viewers about his charity.

Jirard is a YouTuber who runs a channel known as the Completionist, where he plays games to 100% completion and reviews them based on how enjoyable the experience was.

The Open Hand Foundation, which was co-founded by Jirard in 2014, was set up to raise money for dementia charities after his dementia-stricken mother passed away. However, their yearly filings with the IRS suggest that none of this money has been donated to charity.

Jacque (Jirard's brother) responded to Karl's emails to the Open Hand Foundation claiming that they are still searching for the correct charity to partner with and disburse these funds, whereas Jirard claimed that he was only aware that none of the funds had gone out last year, yet is still openly promoting Open Hand on stream and claiming they support the UCSF, Alzheimer's Association, the AFTD and many other charities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GenBlob@lemm.ee 71 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Jirard never seemed like the type of guy to pull something like this and I really want to see his response but having the money just sit there (and hopefully still there) for years is a really bad look for him. At the very least he was just clueless but that's still damaging taking into account all the lies on the charity streams

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

I really want to see his response

Muta talks to him during his video, I think. Response is basically "I had no clue" mixed with some vague excuses, including some that clearly contradict what was said before.

And then does the "But I don't know how to fix this, so if you have any idea...", as if, you know, donating the fucking money is such a difficult thing to do. And like Muta says, they don't even detail their operating expenses, so any accountant could have a field day with that.

[–] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I was giving him the benefit of the doubt, but after listening to the call, basically he pass the blame on both because they found the issue, to the point of saying that they did it for the views...

After that I knew that something is off, then he replied with something like "what do you want me to do, give all the money away, that will only make me look bad if I do it right now", but that was the goal of the donation.

I mean, I wouldn't see an issue if he was giving money but he didn't and he was claiming to donated to several associations, which didn't get a single dime

Edit: big fingers small cellphone.

[–] SendMeBakedBeans@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

bamlame

Woooah, Black Betty

[–] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry, big fingers and small cellphone is a bad combination

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Laughing hard at this and singing it in my head lololol

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I have only EVER heard nice and good things about Jirard, so I'm going to wait for some actual evidence before making any judgements.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Jirard’s Open Hands charity is a nonprofit so you can see their books through their tax filings.

The most likely explanation is that Jirard is incredibly busy running a successful YouTube channel and so he had no idea how the charity is being run.

When being made aware in 2022 he said he stepped in to make sure the money is being donated the way he believed it was. That wasn’t reflected in their 2022 tax filing but it still can be true for 2023, the public will find that out when those filings are made public.

Karl Jobst is a really good content creator but he has a bit of a dramatic flair and tends to call things “illegal” when they actually aren’t and he did in this video again. Still I think that it’s important to make call outs like this. And I think that Jirard will make it right, now that he has been made aware. It’s clear from the filings that they aren’t committing fraud or skimming off the top. They just were sitting on the money probably because the task of running a charity was beyond their capabilities

[–] olmec@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I feel like your comment is the most reasonable explanation. The charity sounds like it isn't actively being run. It is probably a misunderstanding. I can see the charity paying for a group to run the charity, but because their income is very small, they want the charity ran frugally, and are paying the minimum required for management. The management is running the account, making sure taxes are filed, etc, but Jirard thought they were dispersing the funds too. They don't talk much, other than a quick review at tax season, and the issue is never addressed, because both sides don't interact enough to see the difference.

This video really frustrated me, because Jobst is claiming things "Fraud" when the evidence he provided looks nothing like that. It isn't great PR, but nothing so far looks remotely illegal, or even unethical. The internet just loves ragging on a "bad guy," and are eager to get mad at the bad guy of the day.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The one thing that does lean more towards malice is the quote from the UCSF guy who was fired long before the charity existed.

That said, I otherwise agree. If the IRS forms are right, the money is just sitting there. That's not illegal in itself. It just looks bad.

Jobst also doesn't always know US law, since he has a legal background in Australia (and I'm not sure what his specialty was, either).

He particularly mentioned in the video that the IRS isn't an all-knowing monster ready to pounce on unsuspecting taxpayers, which is true. I've seen the bullshit US tax protesters sometimes get away with. Irwin Schiff, for example, once signed a blank 1040 form and sent it into the IRS. He almost made it to the statue of limitations until he went on The Tomorrow Show (a nationwide NBC talk show) and bragged about it. That said, people in the US do tend to think of the IRS as an all-knowing monster ready to pounce on unsuspecting taxpayers, and that's why the response with the guy came back that way. Jobst doesn't seem to be fully cognizant of how people in the US view the IRS.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] naticus@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago (11 children)

And on the other hand, Karl Jobst has always been very well researched in his videos, so I'm a big torn here. Definitely going to keep an eye on this and see where it goes before making my own conclusions.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] andyMFK@reddthat.com 52 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

...did you watch the video? You can see their contributions have been $0 year after year with their tax filings, and Jirard admitted they haven't donated anything.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know who this guy is or anything about the situation other than what's written here, but if he's naming specific charities supposedly receiving these donations, it makes zero sense that they'd be "looking for a good charity to donate to." If that were the case there'd be zero reason to name the ones they did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] code@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 years ago

Easy to check the filings yourself. The research presented in the video is legit. There is no reason to have zero donations to charities since 2014. Zero

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 34 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What “actual evidence” are you waiting for? The filings are public (you can confirm literally right now) and Jirard admitted to the accusations himself? What else do you need?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At the same time, Mutahar and Karl are very well respected content creators who do their research. They wouldn't drop a bombshell like this if they didn't have good sources.

I too will wait to see how Jirard responds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

He's already caught in a lie. Even if his unbelievable story that he, the director of the charity, was unaware the charity never did anything charitable for as long as it has existed (this already makes him guilty of failing the donators by incompetence), he still lied about knowing where the money went for all those years to the donators and CONTINUED TO DO SO AFTER HE ADMITTED HE KNEW ABOUT IT.

Now he claims that he has been looking for worthy charities for over a year while he could easily just donate the money to the charities he has been talking about for years already.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pseudonaut@lemmy.today 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The literal IRS tax filing isn’t enough evidence for you?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 53 points 2 years ago (1 children)

claiming that they are still searching for the correct charity to partner

Isn't that something you should do before you start a donation drive? Wtf?

[–] Inmate@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, you don't understand, this is decades long process for most NPOs and charities. Some will wait for a century or more to find the right organization. Doctors without Borders, for instance, has a notoriously difficult time performing their duties as the borders keep changing over time as they wait for the right fit--many of their doctors are, in fact, within borders.

My charity has a pile of gold that a dragon sits on until the dragon has found a CEO and board of trustees who can withstand 20k° of dragonfire. Until then, I'd be a fool not to collect interest, for charity of course.

[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And if you happen to use this interest and money to fund your company while you search for the right charities to support it's OK. It's all for charity sake after all!

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is standard practise to use part of the donations for expenses and administration after all

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 36 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Funny enough, I think the most blatant and consequential example of this not being able to be taken in good faith is the use of the quote from the UCSF person on the charity website. A person who was fired for money problems 7 years before the charity existed.

No matter what explanation they can give for why they have a quote from him thanking them for donating to UCSF, I see no way for the explanation to be good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I see he’s going for the career downfall completion

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In all honesty I'm shocked. Jirard is one of the few YouTubers I have (well, had) a tonne of respect for.

Part of me wants to hope there's a rational explanation for why he and his foundation sat on viewer donations for a whole decade whilst knowingly misleading donors that their funds were going to a charitable cause, but I really think this is going to end his career. Just wait until every other YouTuber picks this story up, or when it goes viral on Reddit...

[–] code@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hint: there is no excuse thats legitimate. Ive busted local charities the same way.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think some explanations are worse than others.

Either the OHF have been incompetent with filing their annual returns, have been incompetent with actually ensuring the money goes to the right people, or there's some embezzlement going on.

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Well, Jirard admitted on the call in the video that he knew almost two years ago that the charity had never donated to anything. So strike those options off your list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HonorIsDead@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Big "I pledged it" energy here.

[–] freebdsm@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I watched the video. It's definitely not looking good for Jirard but I'll reserve judgement until he responds. These allegations are really bad.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

I haven’t watched this video, but watched the one by No Ordinary Gamer, and he included responses he got from Jirard. It didn’t look great.

[–] gamingdexter@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'd say watch both videos, Muta's video is a little more in depth, but it is just odd to hold onto the money for so long. At least they aren't spending it on nonsensical things, but if they get audited, that will be a big problem with how they filled out their taxes. I'm hoping for the best though, I do like Jirard and I can't imagine how it is with your parent/family going through that

[–] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

It's more than odd, it's deception. He has been talking to his donators as if the money has been going to charities for years. He has named specific charities that haven't received a single dime from them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Watched it too, fan of both channels so this is strange.

There is a possibility that Jirard just wasn't in the loop and didn't know, but someone was (brother?) But regardless this is very suspect.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As a board member of his own charity, he has to be aware of it at some point. Heck, he even acknowledged to know this since 2021 and still nothing happened.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

At best, he didn’t know, which means he really didn’t care enough to even check to make sure the money was going to where it was supposed to be going? Like, the ONE thing a charity does? Even so, in 10 years, he wasn’t suspicious at all about not hearing back from these organizations (like a “Thank You for your donation letter”)? He didn’t give a shit about the charity, and used it to flaunt his own brand and ego. And that’s the BEST case scenario.

Worst case scenario he is knowingly committing charity fraud…by using his own Mother as bait. Fucking deplorable if you ask me.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] chairman@feddit.nl 12 points 2 years ago

Since 2014 huh?

[–] Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

Well, this is incredibly disappointing. I wasn't aware the Completionist had a charity dedicated to dementia, but I've respected his commitment to preserving gaming media and history. Still none of this looks good and I'm struggling to find a good reason as to why you would just sit on donations for nearly a decade without dispersing them.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

If it's true. Fuck him

My grandfather is in the earliest stages of dementia and his side of the family dies of alzheimers a lot...

[–] 108@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Even after he found out it didn’t go anywhere he was still shilling it as it was ALL going to charity. Using his dead mother too. As someone who’s Father died with Alzheimer’s, fuck this guy.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Normal Boots seems to have attracted scummy people. Please don't be one of them, PBG!

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago

Muta is frothing at the mouth that he might seem like the sane party for once.

load more comments
view more: next ›