this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
171 points (100.0% liked)

London

1236 readers
18 users here now

"who’d a thunk it"

For discussion about London including the surrounding Greater London area. Discuss all things from news, travel, culture, and general life around the capital and largest city of England!

Rules and other welcoming info can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

a high-rise east London tower built by a Bond villain namesake.

Octopussy Tower?

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Balfron Tower. But the designer was Ernő Goldfinger.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ian Fleming hated modernist architecture, to the point of naming his villains after its perpetrators.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It is said that Fleming despised Erno Goldfinger’s architecture and personality so much, he decided to borrow the distinctive surname and apply it to one of his most notorious villains- ‘Auric Goldfinger’!

Auric Goldfinger… Fleming’s fictional creation and Erno’s unfortunate namesake When the novel was released in 1959, Erno Goldfinger was furious.

As well as the name, the fictitious baddie shared an uncannily similar family background to the architect; both being East European Jews who’d emigrated from their homelands in the 1930s.

So, note that “It is said” and not some direct quote of Fleming himself, FWIW.

https://blackcablondon.net/2012/06/30/the-trellick-tower-from-doom-to-desire/

That said, lawyers got involved, so there was definitely something going on.

Erno Goldfinger decided to get his lawyers involved and the matter was quickly tided up- all the publishers had to do was pay the relevant costs and declare that all characters in the novel were fictitious.

Ian Fleming meanwhile was enraged at the fuss… and almost persuaded his publishers to change the fateful name to the rather more offensive ‘Goldpri*k!’

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A small balcony has provided his only access to the outside, he has only had frozen leftovers to eat, and his dog has not gone outside for a week.

That's terrible, where is the dog doing its business?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's terrible, what if there's a fire?

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh come on, what are the odds that an entire high rise in London would catastrophically burn down?

/s

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn't it advised to avoid using elevators when there's a fire?

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

What is this person's alternative? Jumping off the balcony? Throwung themselves down the stairs?

[–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

They mention that one of the broken lifts was the designated fire lift so I guess not?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 3 weeks ago

Get Streisand-ed!

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

First of all, let's arrest the architect who designed that monster.