this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
792 points (96.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32885 readers
4550 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

It feels to me that at some point, we will just need to do away with all categories. At what point does it stop being useful to keep putting labels on points on a possibly infinite spectrum?

Would it be better to just push for acceptance in all forms? Forget the labels and just be yourself and accept others for who they are? (Barring, of course, people who are evil or criminal, etc)

My personal experience has been one of:i am unsure of my sexuality and unsure of my gender. Eventually, i decided that I wouldn't focus on what gender or sexuality i am since i dont fit into the main categories. i will just be my own category and enjoy my life the way i want to live it.

I know who i am, and i know what i am. I dont need a label to feel secure about that.

Man was enough, and straight was enough to make things easier for me and others. even though i am not quite man and not quite straight. I fit nicely into neither category, but both are close enough that i am content to just say that rather than have to explain myself to everyone i meet.

Anyone who knows me or gets to know me will know who and what i am eventually.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 5 points 5 days ago

People use labels to get information quickly as a form of vetting.

"You're not... a republican, are you?"

"Oh, hell no!"

"Oh good!"

Now they can let their guard down and be friends. Without labels, determining they are talking to a decent person takes much longer.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

You make some good points, and even though the labels man and straight work for me, I have likewise been focusing more and more on the whole "know thyself and live life the way that really works for you" thing and loving it.

But back to my quip: You make some good points. I can foresee how much my dumb angry conservative relatives would hate it! No labels? No categories? Next you're going to tell me that humans don't naturally need strict hierarchy in their society to survive!

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Really digging deep into the tickle trunk to find something to hate straight people for...

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

One can point out hypocrisy in another without hating them

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Just not this one.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't take much digging.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

To find an excuse to hate people? Must be pretty deep already to have abandoned reason.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Straight people. You conveniently dropped that descriptor 🤡

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

You feel its okay to hate straight people?

[–] banzhaff@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I can't even read this name…

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

the most violently british name ever invented "hi, i'm berwick-upon-tweed, nice to meet you!"

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

Holy shit… Thanks!

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

To be honest, I think we should just switch to using "queer" at this point. The Q covers everything. In fact we could just use the letter Q and be like on star trek.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It still makes me uncomfortable as an old fart Gen Xer from back when it was almost exclusively used as a slur, but I recognize it's been reclaimed. It's just a hard association to break.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just use LGBT+ since it was LGBT for a long time (it was GLBT but the Ls earned their place at the front during the AIDS crisis) then it became LGBTQ, then a bunch of other letters were added while the community was recognizing is profound variety before it turned into LGBTQ+

Q+ has a nice ring to it, but since I'm an unusual form of NB, I fit squarely into the catch-all variety of Q.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I met someone in a dream last night named Fobertleigh. There is no point to this, The post just reminded me of it.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I dont think names ever come up in my dreams now that I think of it

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I think in my dreams I already know who they are whether it's someone I know IRL or it's someone completely imaginary.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I rarely have sound in my dreams. I hear fine (when awake), just... don't bother rendering that part when I'm asleep!

I talk with people in dreams, sure; but there's no dialogue - I just kind of know what's been said.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This sounds like the NPC I make up on the spot when the players ask the guard their name

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pick a name and use it for every guard, except switch the first consonant every time.

They will get a kick out of it a few times, and then slowly learn that there's no point in asking the guard's name.

Lambert, Hambert, Tambert, Kambert, and Dambert all come from a long lineage of esteemed city guards :)

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Samwell, Blanewell, Roywell, Hatwell, Wealwell, Johnwell"

https://youtu.be/Odo3F1WqO4A

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Exactly! So hot, so solid... and a little bit sick of course :)

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 days ago

Maxwell immediately adopting an unexplained and unflappable admiration for Wealwell is such a Murph thing to do and I love it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

!tragedeigh@lemmy.blahaj.zone

not very active yet unfortunately but it was more of a hit than one would think on reddit

[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think Sigurd Felix Wolfgang Atreides has some very rich parents.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (10 children)

"The terms pansexual, omnisexual, fluid and queer-identified are regarded as falling under the umbrella term bisexual (and therefore are considered a part of the bisexual community). Some use LGBT+ to mean "LGBT and related communities".[29] Other variants may have a "U" for "unsure"; a "C" for "curious"; another "T" for "transvestite"; a "TS", "2S", or "2" for "two-spirit" persons; or an "SA" for "straight allies".[48][49][50][51][52] The inclusion of straight allies in the LGBT initialism has proven controversial, as many straight allies have been accused of using LGBT advocacy to gain popularity and status in recent years,[53] and various LGBT activists have criticised the heteronormative worldview of certain straight allies.[54] Some may also add a "P" for "polyamorous" or "pangender", an "H" for "HIV-affected", or an "O" for "other".[14][55] The initialism LGBTIH has seen use in India to encompass the hijra third gender identity and the related subculture.[56][57]"

Only Anglo-Saxons can make not being straight an overly structured and semantically confusing endeavour, lol. 🤷

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 6 days ago

Only Anglo-Saxons? Are you sure?

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

as a member of the letter gang, can we just call ourselves the letter gang and be done with it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago (7 children)

There are straight trans people in the LGBT community. It's not as simple as "not straight".

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I usually only hear LGBTQIA+ which has the I for intersex and the A Aro/Ace spectrum. The Q is just queer which is a an umbrella term for everything. I don't really see the issue with others though, I also wouldn't know how to make it less complicated in any language. Describing oneself as straight is just comparatively easy as it one thing rather than every other sexuality + also gender stuff. Being homosexual is also just one word and no more difficult.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think the point is that the classification into discrete categories is kind of contrary to the point of queerness.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If "queer" is an umbrella term then why wouldn't the whole community just be referred to as such?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] felsiq@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As a way to simplify, I’ve always like GSM: Gender and Sexual Minorities. Seems to encompass everything without prioritizing any of the letters, and doesn’t require choosing an arbitrary stop point for which letters to list or not list.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›