169
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Octavio@lemmy.world 108 points 10 months ago

I wish them both complete success in this endeavor.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Same. First time I've ever wished them anything but ridicule, misery and irrelevance.

[-] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 57 points 10 months ago
[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

Yo dawg. Did you hear what he called her?

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

She said his what was what?

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

D-word was s-word.

[-] llamapocalypse@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago

And nothing of value was lost.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.de 38 points 10 months ago

message to Twitter, formerly X

Nobody tells me anything around here.

[-] thesprongler@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Oh I didn't tell you, I changed it back.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 38 points 10 months ago

She added in another post to Shapiro: "You have been acting unprofessional and emotionally unhinged for weeks now

Oh Candace... You have some googling to do if you think it's only been weeks.

[-] SapphironZA 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How can we help them do it?

[-] Digital_Prophet@kbin.social 34 points 10 months ago

This is the first time in a long time where you can say "no matter who loses, we win," instead of the other way around.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

They could both fail to destroy the other.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago

Owens tweeted:

No government anywhere has a right to commit a genocide, ever. There is no justification for a genocide. I can't believe this even needs to be said or is even considered the least bit controversial to state.

That is what drew the ire of Shapiro.

"The question is about Candace Owens," Shapiro said in the video posted to X by user @LoomerLs. "I think her behavior during this has been disgraceful, without a doubt."

Shapiro's answer was met with applause from the audience, followed by his acknowledgment that Owens "still works at my company."

"I think that her faux sophistication on these particular issues has been ridiculous," Shapiro added. "Everybody can see the moves that she's making and the things that she's saying, and I find them disreputable."

[-] Algaroth@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

"faux sophistication". Pot calling kettle black.

[-] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 16 points 10 months ago

Just using the term "faux sophistication" is faux sophistication if I've ever seen it.

[-] Algaroth@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I don't think I've ever seen a more pretentious douchebag other than Jordan Peterson.

[-] gatelike@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

yeah we all give our selves away, why would he even be thinking about the topic of trying to act smart? I used to ride a train to work and one morning a man was wearing those old timey boards with suspenders and messages about repenting and god. He kept yelling about the bible, it was really uncomfortable and I bet he was the biggest sinner of us all, what would motivate someone to do that?

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Who, Ben? Fucking Aquaman?!

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 27 points 10 months ago

🍿 🍿 🍿

[-] NoiseColor@startrek.website 21 points 10 months ago

These people can't stand eachother, they are all grifters and it's so easy to pit them against eachother.

[-] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 11 points 10 months ago

Is this a strategy that could be stimulated, somehow?

[-] NoiseColor@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

For sure it could. There is always at least one thing that they disagree on. When one of them is a woman, it happens by itself.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago
[-] June@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago

In the immortal words of Dr Ishiro Serizawa:

“Let them fight”

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Two monumental pieces of human garbage. Can't wait.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

I mean, why would boy-hitler hate a black person who is also a woman? Does he not see that she agrees with him that only conservative straight white men are jesus' chosen leaders for planet earth and that non-conservatives should be slaughtered wholesale?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Why would girl-Hitler hate a jew? Does she not see that he agrees with her that only Christian Conservative males are Jesus’ chosen leaders for planet earth and that non-Christians should be slaughtered wholesale?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago

Back in the day, Reagan wanted a 'Big Tent.' Nowadays, the Gipper is just another RINO neoliberal

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

"better to have them inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in"
Well, now they're inside the tent and pissing all over the floor

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

"A Flash Of Green" by John D. MacDonald. Great little novel about a Florida land grab and local corruption. Written in the Kennedy years.

A one point, the main political boss sends one of his stooges to get rid of the married banker's girl friend. The stooge asks what's wrong with the banker getting a little action on the side. The boss tells the stooge that the banker is being too brazen and people are startign to talk. They plot needs the banker to look clean.

If they did the story today, the plotters wouldn't send her out of town, they'd make her head of the 'Sluts For Trump.'

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago
[-] 21racecar12@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I’ll grab the popcorn! Who wants butter?!

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

TIL Candace Owens. For th lazy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candace_Owens

She's a token black American conservative, and conspiracy theorist. She has a political talk show on the Daily Wire which is a conservative propaganda outlet.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

A lot of these conservative talking heads, including Candace Owens, are just actors recruited from a talent agency

[-] Pissnpink@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago

Paid actor implies she's scripted and saying other people's words. She might parrot right wing talking points, but shes doing it because she's a grifter.

[-] 1847953620@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Shapiro is a failed showbiz writer, too. Hmmmmmm...

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Add to that the Daily Wire is Shapiros shitrag, so he’s her boss in this situation.

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago
[-] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago
[-] Snapperhead@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Let them continue.

[-] Wodge@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

GRIFT ROYALE!

[-] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Simpsons monkey fight.gif

[-] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Best wishes to both.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Oh nice, a feel-good story.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
169 points (90.0% liked)

politics

18904 readers
3010 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS