this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
853 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

25040 readers
2013 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 57 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Do you have to print it out and scan it first?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

Only if you don’t have a fax.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maxwells_daemon@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago

It will definitely not report back to Musk on your proprietary code...

Because Musk wouldn't understand shit, it'll report back to some Indian guy instead.

[–] lowered_lifted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I find that without being able to see the rest of my IDE it makes no sense to just paste a single class worth of code at a time in there, it has no context for the rest of the application

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 15 points 4 days ago

You've heard of monorepos, but have you tried monofile development?

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He probably thinks that the entire application is only one source file

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

He also thinks that the number of lines of code produced is a relevant measure of productivity, so him not understanding this isn't super surprising.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I do work for an AI centric company and we've used almost every major model in some way, shape, or form.

Grok was so bad on all fronts that we ceased using it completely.

So I don't believe this for one second. I don't even find ChatGPT to be useful for code. I'd probably put Claude first and versions of Gemini second, with no current third.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 33 points 4 days ago

Wait, so if everyone at xAI does that, does that mean that Grok's own source code was the result of Grok's output?

And then they once again feed that source into Grok?

Dude is destroying his own product. Again.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 30 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Hey Grok, take this one file out of the context of my 250,000 line project and give me that delicious AI slop!

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago

Just really fuck up this shit. I want it unrecognizable!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 28 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Wait so are they using grok to code grok? No wonder it keeps getting shittier

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

10 PRINT CHR$ (205.5 + RND (1));
20 GOTO 10

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (8 children)

how does the AI know what the rest of the project is like? Or what the purpouse of the file is?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Using Grok to develop Grok... This sounds like Model Collapse with extra steps.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›