this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
139 points (97.9% liked)

Android

19728 readers
456 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sameer Samat, president of Android ecosystem at Google, asked a TechRadar journalist why they were using an Apple Watch, iPhone, and MacBook:

I asked because we’re going to be combining Chrome OS and Android into a single platform, and I am very interested in how people are using their laptops these days and what they’re getting done.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

This is such a good business move

Android would really help to increase competition in the desktop space.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Considering Google's failure to support the tablet form factor on Android (many 1st party Google apps have much better versions for the iPad), I am skeptical this will lead to anything good.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 2 points 11 hours ago

I miss the era around the release of Android 4 where there were all sorts of interesting 10" Android tablets coming out.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Their ChromeOS tablets suck as well. The only reason for me to buy Google hardware is to put GrapheneOS on it.

pls someone take android away from google before they ruin it even more.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Closed ecosystems are one of the reasons I don't use an Apple Watch, iPhone, or MacBook. I know I'm not the typical target consumer, but I'm not that special. There are a lot of people who specifically avoid convergence.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 7 points 1 day ago

This one might be different. Many Chromebook owners mostly use Android Apps when not browsing in Chrome. Chromebook tablets are great, for instance, because they are basically Android tablets with full desktop Chrome (I still use FF, though).

Adding a full desktop browser to Android would realistically remove the need for ChromeOS, and be more efficient since it would remove the emulation requirement.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A decade ago this would have been exciting news for mobile computing.

Enough has changed that all I can think is, uuugh.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Two decades ago people would remember when M$ decided to do something very similar on the desktop. Nothing has changed.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'll thank you not to refer to 2012 as "two decades ago." Felt like I drank from the wrong grail, before double-checking when Windows 8 came out.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Who's talking about Windows 8 or 2012? I said 2 decades and meant it. I wasn't talking about the same time frame, just pointing out the history we are repeating. I was talking about "United States vs Microsoft Corp." (2001). That would have been regarding Windows 98 and Windows XP. ~~Internet Explorer~~Edge is still an integral and unremovable component of Microsoft's operating systems to this day and I guess everyone really has forgotten about Netscape Navigator.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it's almost like we were talking about something else entirely.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why bother commenting at all if you're going to be proudly ignorant AND a jerk?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why did you obliquely reference a different company doing a completely different thing? Microsoft did do something very similar on desktop - making Windows 8 tablet-centric. Nothing in XP or especially 98 has anything to do with mobile computing.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 0 points 2 hours ago

It's not a completely different thing. They were both trying to fully integrate the operating system and the web browser into one monolithic and inescapable thing: Windows XP + Internet Explorer to squash competition on the desktop; Linux + Chrome to squash competition on laptops; Android + Chrome OS to squash competition in the mobile space. The money to be made on operating systems is trivial in the consumer space compared to the power of control over platforms (like web browsers) that deliver advertisements and harvest data from comsumers. M$ saw the writing on the wall way back then in their fight with Netscape Navigator. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

I feel like I'm talking to an AI chatbot completely unable to reason abstractly or consider the full context of the conversation.

[–] ChuckTheMonkey@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Enough has changed that all I can think is, uuugh. This is exactly my feeling. While I still consider Google to be the lesser evil out of all the big tech companies. They have been in freefall in the last decade. Just the amount of telemetries give me shivers.

Also, it will be a license nightmare. As far as I know, Chrome OS is proprietary and actual Android has proper open source license.

[–] 73QjabParc34Vebq@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Parts of Chrome OS are available, parts aren't. Parts of Android are available, parts aren't. Neither are really Open Source, but both have Open Source parts.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same with MacOS and iOS. They're doing the same shift Apple has done over the last 25 years. Build on open-source, and slowly pivot to closed-source binaries. The perception of openness lags for a very long time until people finally realize it has just become more proprietary limited crap.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Not really as there is no Apple equivalent to AOSP

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

As far as I know, Chrome OS is proprietary

It's only proprietary in much the same way as Android. That's why there are forks like FydeOS.

[–] Kyle@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Exactly my feelings.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh god they are getting rid of adblock on Android too :D

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Hopefully everyone can start dumping support into Linux for mobile

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Android is way better than any Linux device I've used. It is very solid security wise and has apps made for mobile. Mobile Linux feels clunky since the apps are typically ported from the desktop.

It would be better if there was a Android fork with lots of momentum and money.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

I'm hoping for this too. All it takes is someone figuring out verified boot and encryption and I'm jumping ship. Could not care less about battery life or optimization, I am rarely far from a charger or portable battery.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

???

Unless they ban installations from 3rd party stores, I don't see how that can happen.

You could always install firefox from F-Droid

With the EU's Digital Markets Act, I think its gonna be quite difficult to ban 3rd party installations, I mean unless they pull an apple and make 2 versions of the OS for EU vs rest of the world?

[–] msage@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which does not affect Firefox

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Apple doesn't exactly try to converge OS platform, even forking off iPad OS from iOS.

Microsoft's converged desktop and tablet OS hasn't been well regarded.

Google's efforts to make Android well suited on tablets has been poorly maintained.

I did find ChromeOS Flex on an old Surface Pro 3 to be a pretty good tablet experience. I'm cautiously optimistic about this, though I haven't tried the desktop mode on my Pixel 7.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apple doesn’t exactly try to converge OS platform, even forking off iPad OS from iOS

It is more that they couldn't figure out how - but they keep on slowly removing bits of all three and making all of them act the same way, so eventually they will be one bloated monolith if they continue down this path.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Well iPad and iPhone did have the same OS at first, so they knew how to do that. I would have preferred when they forked iPad OS out for them to have converged desktop and iPad instead of making a 3rd distinct OS variant. I can't reasonably say that a docked iPad is the same as a Mac, as commercial apps I use have different versions, with different capabilities, for iPad and Mac. Things like Adobe Lightroom andIK Multimedia Amplitube. But my Surface Pro has one set of apps whether I'm docked at home, using a clamshell keyboard case, or as a tablet and pen. That's more useful to me than having a really well polished and dedicated tablet OS.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Lineage works great on the Galaxy Tabs that support it

[–] cron@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's sort of an open secret for years now. But I'm not totally convinced that it will work well.

I have a Chromebook with a Ryzen APU (Ryzen 3250 or smth). And while it handles all web tasks really well, it completely struggles with Android Apps. Even apps like "YouTube Kids" or "Prime Video" run far worse than their web couterparts.

And I'm not even talking about gaming - even old games like "cut the rope" run at unplayable framerates.

(my guess is that the whole virtualization framework is holding these apps back.)

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I have a Chromebook with a Ryzen APU (Ryzen 3250 or smth). And while it handles all web tasks really well, it completely struggles with Android Apps. Even apps like β€œYouTube Kids” or β€œPrime Video” run far worse than their web couterparts.

That's why future ChromeOS won't be a dedicated OS with an Android running in a VM. They'll be actual Android.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

this is pretty good news, seeing ChromeOS supports Linux apps and is wayland-based now

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

It would be nice if it way all unified so that Linux apps would run on any Android device.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Supports Linux apps poorly.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I think this is precisely why they added Linux support to Android.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"No shit."

Everyone who remembers that announcement that chromebooks would run android apps.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I'm thinking this is the opposite direction, with the enhanced desktop mode in Android 16. You hook your phone up to a KVM and get Chrome desktop, complete with containerized Linux apps and your mobile apps staying on your mobile device.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Which I will never use, thank you very much.